Can you spell "pretentious?" Even if I could afford these homes, I
would not purchase them. No one needs that much unless their "need" is
to be sure everyone knows how much money they have. I see no purpose in having
such a home.
OMG.. you posted the ADDRESSES for these places? I'd use my multimillions
to move away from any of these now-targets.
Archie1954,Violence happens everywhere, unfortunately. My
spouse's cousin was murdered in British Columbia; she had her house burnt
down around her by a former boyfriend. His jail sentence for this murder - six
Really? We can't have a nice article about big houses without someone
coming in and stinking it up the place with an Obamacare whine? This is why we
can't have nice things. . . . Get over it already.Although I
wouldn't want something too huge, I would be lying if I were to say I
wouldn't want some of those houses with the gorgeous kitchens, theater,
bowling ally, indoor and outdoor pools, and the view. If someone can afford
those things, why not?Although on the lower end of the prices shown
here, an honorable mention for over the top houses for sale would be the Wardley
Mansion in Davis County.
If these homes can be sanctuaries of peace and love, a home where families can
learn and grow, where there is great happiness, well, let the folks who have
them built build them. As for me and my house, small (much, much, much smaller)
is better. One, I do not possess the financial means to build/buy such a house.
Two, even if I did have the means, I would never buy one. Three, I do not
possess the vanity necessary to build such 'great and spacious'
buildings. Fourth, why would I want to pay the yearly taxes, monthly heating and
cooling bills, and need a staff of people to clean one of these monstrosities? I
am a person of simple means and tastes and see myself as someone who would
rather use 2 or 40 million dollars to help the homeless, or help with literacy
programs. But hey, this is just me and I'm a happy being modest in home and
Am I envious? Of course. Would I buy such a place, assuming I had
the money to do it? Probably not, we really don't need that much room, and
would probably like other "toys" much more, or perhaps even be a bit
more charitable.However, it's THEIR money and THEY can buy
whatever houses they want to with it.Thanks for letting the rest of
us visit your world.Before any haters get too spun up about how
"unfair" it is, or why "they" have so much more, remember, the
property taxes on these homes are astronomical, and most owners probably provide
jobs for lots of folks for cleaning, grounds keeping, decorating, maintenance,
catering, etc. Anyone who works hard is entitled to keep the fruits of their
labor and spend it as they see fit.
Very beautiful homes but they lack one very important aspect of real estate
investment, location! Certainly the region is amazing and spectacular but it is
situated in the US. Unfortunately that nation has a very dysfunctional society,
a political system that is deadlocked, a military point of view, endless wars,
even, if you can believe it, a problem of rape in the barracks. Don't
forget the economy that is only benefitting the already very rich, you know the
ones who actually look at these ads with a goal of buying one. No thanks,
I'll stay in my own part of the world which just happens to be the best, by
far, ski destination in North America, Whistler. I know that when I come here
for weeks on end I am safe with no crazy gun lovers able to threaten me and mine
whenever they wish. You can keep your gorgeous homes when they come with all the
extras I just mentioned.
I wonder how many spoons the kitchens of these homes have?
I think #1 is the Huntsmans pad isn't it?
Nice to visit when friends have places like these. Personally I have no
interest in attempting to pay the fleet of people to maintain a place like alot
of these. The more things you have the more things you have to fix.I have a pretty decent size home and often wish it was smaller. Simply not
what it is cracked up to be. Just a bunch more work to clean and maintain..but
then again at this level these people just pay for that too....or do they? Ever wonder why all these high dollar homea are for sale?Think about it.
500 square feet per person plus 500 square feet for the family. No one needs
more than that. Anything above that, except in unusual circumstances, is
I'm surprised how many of these houses have right around an acre of
property. Maybe it's me, but if I spend 2, 5, 20 million bucks on a house I
want more than an acre of land, but only 2 of these places had the kind of
acreage i'd expect for that kind of money. The other thing I wonder about
is with the 20, 30 thousand square foot homes is how many people you have to
hire just to clean and maintain the property. I guess if you have the money to
buy a house like this you don't care about paying a maintenance man and
housekeeper to work full time just to keep the property from being destroyed.
But as a guy living in an 800 sq ft house it seems so weird to pay people to
clean for you.
Ninety-two click-throughs! They got me, by golly. They got me.
I wonder if you could get your food storage squashed into the cubbies in the
wine storage room?
This writer (Higbee) is hilarious! Worth reviewing just for the commentary.
WOW! Some beautiful homes here. Somehow, though, I'm quite content with my
kids around me in my little 1700 sq ft 3-bedroom rambler. Maybe I just
didn't set my sights high enough, but life is good.Hey Ted -
nice rant. Nicer homes though.
Sah-WEEEEEET! Nothing like laying up treasures on earth, huh?Do the
owners of these places wield the vacuum and toilet brush, to clean 'em up?
(Yeah, right.)But everything is relative. Do the "mansion
walk" in Newport, RI, and those summer cottages make these Utah offerings
look like a shanty-town.
Homes with a higher bathroom count than room count like these are designed for
guests/parties to accommodate. Not necessarily for the house guests themselves.
Definitely some nice homes here.
So what is the point? He pokes at Republicans, yet the zip codes with the
"wealth" are in democrat heavy areas. Yet I don't despise people
that have gained their wealth by honest means. If they have swindled people out
of their wealth, such as claiming they can give everyone free healthcare or drop
the cost of everyone's healthcare by $2500 and add 30 million people, and
you can keep your doctor period. Then I have a big issue with that.The number of fund raisers that obummer, polosi, stingy reid have had. Chargin
$3500 a plate or more, so their rich friends can rub shoulders with them and buy
favors off the backs of taxpayers. Why haven't they freely given that
wealth to the poor?After all you can tax, borrow, spend, legislate
your way to prosperity right? Or you can fudge the numbers and cook the books
like this regime has to make things seem better.
These aren't homes; they are either corporate retreats or "show
off" mansions.The "old money" people don't have to shove
it in your face; new money does.Do I like a nice hotel? Sure!Do I need to live in one? Nope!
From a practical point of view, it's handy to have a bathroom for every
I feel for you man when I am struggling with a $150,000.00 mortgage that is
difficult for me. Why don't you build your home where ever you want to live
and have an apartment/house in the other location for when you must stay because
you are tired or have to work late. That way you or the family can commute as
needed. Problem solved.