So it's OK to release these illegals into communities who don't want
them but it's not OK to release these illegals into communities who profess
that they do want them?Hypocrisy exposed.Immigrants
welcome."Come through the front door and not the back
The radical right and Trump have dehumanized immigrants, and legal asylum
seekers with these dehumanizing statements.These are real people.
God's children too, contrary to the radical rights slanders and
dishonesties about these amazing people.The teachings of Jesus do
not follow, or align with the slander against these people seeking legal asylum
and a better life.There were people dehumanized by a previous
political regime. History is showing us that Trump is following the same pattern
of making good people "bad" in the eyes of his supporters. Sad!It is wrong and truly an evil that can not continue.The radical
uninformed right is saying that Democrats are for open borders. They are not.
But Trump has shown that his disregard for the laws of this land over and over.
This idea is BRILLIANT! Leaders of sanctuary cities have touted vociferously
the virtues of illegal immigrants! Oh, the diversity, the strength, the beauty
of having millions of uneducated people descend upon our country! Seems strange
that all of a sudden, it's not such a happy thought, you know, now that
some possible logistics would be concerned, ie, housing, education, health care.
I'm so confused.
i dont see the dehuman of this. These cities want them, so let them go there.
I mean the last president move people into areas, so whats the problem
now. Oh wait, its because its Trump
It is not dehumanizing to place them where there are high numbers of liberals
who want the doors for them to be wide open. People who mock trying to control
our borders and secure our country. People who mock people following the law and
coming in legally. People who mock the idea that Central America took its lesson
from Mexico in wanting thousands of their citizens to come to the U.S. illegally
and send some of that money back to their countries. They do to the tune of
billions of dollars every year. These countries aren't stupid and either
are the liberal immigration groups who want them all to come here. They have a
strategy and plan.
@dski - Herriman UTLife, liberty, "and the pursuit of happiness
in our Constitution". This is not in our Constitution, but is from "The
Declaration of Independence". it is a beautiful sentiment but does not
carry the weight of law. Still, Trump, I think, has a terrific idea. Let the
sanctuary cities put their money where their hearts and mouths are.
@Joe Leaphorn - Scottsdale, AZ, you said,"If you want meaningful
dialog, understand some basics of American law."And what is it
about *illegal* immigration that you do not understand? What is it about the
very essence of sanctuary cities (for which you apparently support) that you do
not understand? They are violating federal law. Those are basics of American law
and you illustrate so perfectly why those of your attitude and mentality can no
longer hold a "meaningful dialog" in any way, shape or form.
If releasing illegals in San Francisco is "dehumanizing" and they
don't want them, why do they think any other city wants them ? ....and why is it "dehumanizing" at all ? Most illegal immigrants
actually report they are trying to get to LA or SF. We would be helping them!
This action by President Trump was never intended to be the "solution"
to illegal immigration. It was only to force liberal cities who protect the
criminals from this group to share the burdon of them being here. The solution can only be accomplished by changing the law. It needs to be
done for the good of the country. Otherwise, we will just continue to be driven
wider apart as a country and more violence will continue to occur including
raping of women and children on the way to the US as well as the unnecessary
crimes illegal aliens commit while here.
I appreciate the unintentional candor inherent in the admission that taking
liberals at their word is dehumanizing.
I’m scratching my head on this one. Helping innocent
undocumented people to settle in communities that largely accept them and help
them and give them maximum legal protection under current US law, sounds very
humane and compassionate. I know Trump is doing the right thing for
the wrong reason. But are compassionate, caring Americans going to oppose this
just because Trump proposed it? If something humane and compassionate is being
done, should we really care about the motivation of the person doing it?Are we now so tribalistic that we lost the ability to distinguish
between right and wrong, and good and bad?
Sanctuary cities: We love illegal aliens and we'll take care of them.Governemt: Ok, if you want them, we'll send them.Sanctuary cities:
That's dehumanizing!Thank you, Mr. Romboy for further
illustrating the unhinged utterances of the left.
I think what president Trump is doing is a great thing...for sanctuary cities,
forcing them to put up with what they really want, so give it to them!
Dehumanizing them, I don't agree with that, let the liberals deal with the
law breakers they want so much.
"Please explain (again) why this brilliant move by our awesome President is
so "repulsive"."Seems totally logical to many of us
conservatives.."Logical..seriously? So we have an
effective and efficient system for dealing with migrants, asylum seekers, and
refugees, that is now way overloaded and backed up, and your solution is not to
fix the overload problem, it's to circumvent the system and punish your
political enemies using actual humans as your weapon..and that's logical?
There's nothing "logical" about it. It's a feel
good that'll show 'em thing and that's all. I'm
guessing none of you who support this read the other article attached to this
one where the experts (right and left) were asked what is the problem and what
are solutions. Quick summary everything Trump is doing and you all cheer is
exacerbating the problem and the solutions are in the Democratic proposals
(solve the problems at the source, and fix the immigration court system).
The quickest way to reveal whether someone is telling the truth/of good
character, is to give them what they say they want/do what they say to do.
Their reaction will tell all.The ones who decry the horrible
conditions at the border are doing all they can to make it worse (Come one, come
all!), but pitch a fit if THEY are called upon to take responsibility for the
The history of our Western Hemisphere is long and the interplay between north
and south complex. The subjects of inheritance, migration and citizenship are
intricate and multifaceted. I agree for the most part with Senator Romney. Both
sides must work together to find a here-and-now strategy that protects American
lives and sustains the law. At the same time, ethics wipers the need to provide
at lest some degree of respect and humane care for those seeking a better life.
How and how much are the questions. What we need is a meaningful path forward.
May Heaven help us, as individuals and as a One Nation Under God, to find the
best path to follow. As I see it, in both best and worst case scenario, a double
portion of Christ-like empathy will go a heck of a long way to help our United
States of America to reunite, survive and thrives.
Mr. Gravy,The current "crisis" at the border concerns people
seeking asylum. These people are entitled by US and international law to be
admitted into the country and to have their requests for asylum adjudicated by
the appropriate court of law. Asylum seekers aren't breaking our laws;
they're asking us to observe our own laws. I believe that the count is up
to 25 now--25 times federal judges have ruled against the Trump
Administration's various attempts to circumvent these laws. And the judges
who are ruling against the Administration include appointees by Republican
presidents going back to Ronald Reagan.
How deplorable. Once again Hillary Clinton’s words are proven 100%
accurate. Correct me if I’m mistaken, but shouldn’t the alt-right
faction be extremely concerned about these immigrants voting liberal in future
elections? This has been the talking point narrative on this forum regularly;
so, from all of us that vote liberal, we owe ‘The Donald’ a
tremendous thank you in my opinion, for all of the impending votes headed the
Dems way during the next election cycle and beyond. Continue displaying
brilliance by sending buses to these cities. You’re welcome.
@jparryPursuit of happiness in our Constitution is for the citizens of
this country, United States of America, not the whole world.@Impartial7Rules of law begins at the border. Crossing our borders
illegally means total disregard for our laws. If we have no decency for
insisting that our laws be observed, so be it. How sad it is that we
demonize our President for trying to enforce the laws of our country. He cannot
cherrypick the laws he wants to enforce and used Executive Orders to ignore
others he doesn’t like.
It's a great idea. All we hear from Democrats is how much a "plus"
illegal immigration is for America. We hear this constantly from mayors of
sanctuary cities. If so, I would surely expect them to be grateful to have all
these wonderful people and positive attributes they bring coming to their
Trump's own words, "california want's lots of people, well we have
alot of them and we have an endless supply", "they say we accept them
with open arm's, let's see if they accept them with open
arm's".Dem's do not want to enforce our very own
law's and refuse to deport illegal's and prosecute them for crimes
committed.I agree with trump, the dem's refuse to change the
law's that encourage so many to cross the border illegaly so if we
can't send them back then might as well send them to the cities that claim
to want them and protect them from the big bad government law's that they
wrote.The democrat's and their propaganda machine are losing
their minds over this, how disingenuous.Based on their own
comment's "these people are people too and deserve to be
protected", so protect them dems instead of sending them all of the country
to conservative counties and cities and expect them to foot the bill.It's time to put their words into action, you'd think the
democrat's would be happy about this.
Add the word 'sanctuary' to the Newspeak dictionary.
@JaneBPlease explain (again) why this brilliant move by our awesome
President is so "repulsive".Seems totally logical to many of
us conservatives who have wondered for so long why liberals oppose controlling
who crosses our borders.
@Impartial7Right on. And, apparently, the "rule of law"
means very little or nothing to those who enter this country illegally and thus
ignore and violate our laws.Nor to those who govern sanctuary cities
and States.President Trump is trying to enforce our laws and trying
to "encourage" those in control of sanctuary cities to do the same.Good thing someone in our government believes in the rule of law.
@jparryYes, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"
should be available to all who don't violate our laws to get into this
I am certain that the great political leaders of these designated sanctuaries
have well funded and thought out plans to nurture and care for these folks,
enabling them to pursue the American dream.I mean if you are going
to hold up the mantra of sanctuary city ... would you not be willing to put your
money where your mouth is...
I've been terribly mistaken. I thought I was a citizen of a country that
"hold[s] these truths to be self-evident, that all men [and women] are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."
Husker2 - , 00April 12, 2019 2:07 p.m."Sanctuary cities
take great pride in their name and their progressive thinking until they are
actually called upon to provide sanctuary."There's a lot of
misunderstanding expressed here when people disparage sanctuary cities without
even knowing what they are. They don't understand the concept and show
ignorance in seeing them only as places that give people everything for free.Sanctuary cities are cities where city officials will not turn
undocumented residents in to law enforcement for possible deportation because
they come forward and identify themselves in reporting a crime again themselves
or someone else in the community. Otherwise, these are law abiding people,
living in the community, paying taxes, and contributing to society.Perhaps Donald Trump thinks that loading people up in box cars and
transporting them to a community he identifies as not supportive of himself as a
way to punish the people of that city, he needs to understand that the federal
government would be required to provide resources to that community to support
these people until they can become established just like any other refugee . . .
[more] 1 of 2
2 of 2 [continued]. . . refugee program sponsored by the federal
government. Many of these cities would probably welcome these people as the
develop into some of the best residents in the city and upon gaining
citizenship, become the most loyal and American people in the nation. Not only do they become good citizens, they work harder than most native-born
Americans doing much of the work their American counterparts will not do. They
have a spirit of becoming successful to repay the privilege they have been
granted to come to this country. Their children aspire to do well in school and
become professionals to a greater degree than their American counterparts.I know this because it is the same situation of my great-grandparents
who came to these shores and stayed notwithstanding the racism that faced them
at that time. Also, it is the stories of most of my friends and acquaintances
who came from immigrant families and did well. The American dream lived in them
and lives in those seeking asylum and a desire to live and prosper.Most of those complaining about immigrants today may not understand the forces
their forebears faced upon arrival. The just want to shut the door.
Buses and trains are dehumanizing now? I am sorry to break it to Mr. Jaramillo,
but buses and trains are the only mass transit available to border towns like
Tijuana or Nogales. He can't expect plane travel for the immigrants, can
he? Busloads of immigrants are arriving in Phoenix daily. I am pretty sure the
immigrants are thrilled. The only bad idea here was the publication
of the plan.
Bring it on Mr President Trump. But you cannot leave these people on an island
unable to provide for themselves once you drop them in the "Democratic
sanctuary land". Let them be legally employed and be positive contributors
to society. If you can't do that, then don't bother sending them
"Sanctuary cities? And these cities don't want these illegal immigrants
in their sanctuaries? Trump calls their bluff and they don't like it. I
hope Trump stays the course."Interestingly enough in so doing
trump calls trumps' bluff. After all, even though his motives may be purely
vindictive, which is often the case, they're also not well thought out, as
is often the case. In this instance, he's announced to the world that
America has a place for you if you seek asylum or enter illegally. So much for
the trump national crisis, or the trump wall. Those are a hoax. If trump thinks
you might be a burden on the services of a sanctuary city in America, welcome.
You'll serve his purpose nicely. And stop with the 'Obama
did this or that so trump can do same' argument. Obama has been vanquished,
and the adults are now in the room, as we're told. Leadership isn't
about what Obama did do. It's now about what trump is doing. And
it's terrible, what trump is doing.
It's "dehumanizing" to release illegal immigrants into the cities
that claim to want to offer them sanctuary? I realize that it can be
fun to throw around big, scary words like "dehumanizing" to make
others' ideas sound bad, but what's the logic or reasoning that
supports the characterization?
Sanctuary cities? And these cities don't want these illegal immigrants in
their sanctuaries? Trump calls their bluff and they don't like it. I hope
Trump stays the course.
Once again, President Trump is showing is great humanitarian side when the
liberal left obstructs all attempts to stop the out of control illegal
immigration. It is only appropriate that those cities and states that have
declared themselves to be sanctuary cities be more willing to take on more
illegals that have overwhelmed our ability to house them at the boarder. LA and
San Francisco are ideal locations along with New York City. Clearly these
bastions of human love and acceptance should be the first to feel the blessing
of those people that are just looking for a better life.
I believe Trump is right and I hope he goes through with this plan.
[email protected],"I suggest giving the sanctuary cities exactly what they
are asking for, all the immigrants they want."____________________Send them over. We'll make room. I'd rather see them taken in by my
community than one in which they are unwelcome because they have a darker skin
color and speak in broken English. Makes me think of my own immigrant
The democrats would fight this idea with everything they have because what they
say and what they really want are two different things. Yes, they lie to us
Anyone on the left claiming that Trump's idea here is using illegal
immigrants as a political football is dehumanizing is living in their own
bubble. The left has been using illegal immigrants to score political points
for a generation. That insanity needs to stop. I suggest giving the sanctuary
cities exactly what they are asking for, all the immigrants they want.
"Latino leaders" sounds very racist. I thought we were all supposed to
be treating one another as just fellow humans by now. I don't treat people
differently due to their ethnicity, skin color, or whatever. Why do
institutions and special interest groups cling to these divisive
Uh - aren't they all using migrants as political pawns? The only way to
solve this issue is to close the borders, develop a better more humane system
and then stick to it. The same laws that apply to Americans who wish to travel
or live in other countries absolutely must apply to those who wish to come here.
According to leftist polls illegals commit less crimes than native Americans,
and help the local economy more by their coming. How can it be dehumanizing?
Why don't some of you libs invite some refugees to stay with your families
to help assimilate them into the American culture. My wife and I had a
Cambodian family of 7 live with us and our four kids for 6 months in 1981 until
they could be on their own.. Still love my Cambodian family.
I don't know what all the fuss is about -- They are releasing them every
day some where in the United States because by law they can only hold them a
certain amount of days. As far as i know they haven't been telling us
where they were releasing them -- Now they want to tell us everyone is upset --
Am i missing something ?
Trump’s presidency has already jumped the shark, but the reality is, I
actually don’t believe the media this time. Sure Trump has said some
really offensive things. But I actually find it hard to believe even he would
propose something so inhuman and heartless.Please say it ain’t
Let's send them to places that are safe sanctuaries where they can be
safely and humanely processed and checked for the drug and terrorist elements.
Then let them get ok'd by the laws of the land and spread out from there
into society. Sanctuary cities are prepared to receive them initially ( thus the
name). How could this be inhumane?
"Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous
immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to
placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only."How poetic.
You have liberal politicians who want to bring in every single illegal
immigrant who appears at the border, but they don't want to step up and
care for them in their cities. How hypocritical.
Oh yeah. Before folks get all hot-and-bothered with the thrill of this
'plan' remember the person whose plan it is.Yeah, that
guy.The guy who cannot competently express a simple coherent
thought, much less a complicated policy.Someday -- apparently not
today however -- you will learn this is the sort of agitating Trump does just
prior to a new round of personal embarrassment. In this case, we have the
Mueller report and the Trump tax returns coming down the tracks at full-speed.
Feel free to chase the shiny foil ball that Trump casually tosses on
the floor. The rest of America has better things to do.
RiDal,"Why would an influx of immigrants be considered
"punitive" ? That sounds racist."____________________Not
for one who sees them as a scourge he can threaten to unleash against a city or
municipality that opposes this administration's immigration policy. By even
suggesting such a thing, Trump demeans Hispanic immigrants to avoid seeing them
as real human beings who deserve to be treated as such.
This is absolutely a genius plan and forces the left to own their insanity. I
would like to see all open border proponents own their beliefs in a very
Dehumanizing? Isn't that exactly what they want? I don't get it.
Don't worry, Utah, along with Kansas and Wyoming will share the burden
should Trump make good on his threat and sends a group of immigrants to
Denver.Say a Trump caravan pulls up to Civic Center Park in downtown
Denver and off-loads a few buses of immigrants.Local officials
calmly cull the group and resettle the families and healthy able-bodied men.
The rest -- presumably the most problematic -- they give 1-way
tickets on buses heading to Salt Lake City, Cheyenne, and Kansas City, along
with boxed lunches.
Vanceone - Provo, UTApril 12, 2019 2:37 p.m."I mean,
according to the left . . . "What do you know about the Left?
Your comment reads like a screed from Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, long on
emotional anger and grievance and short on facts. Hyperbole is one thing, but
you only get a yawn from progressives when you repeat wingnut media talking
points.It appears that most Trump conservatives don't even know
why the concept of sanctuary cities was created. They hear something they
don't understand and automatically take a hostile position and begin to
pick it apart. No wonder any legitimate, reasonable discussion is destined to
failure from the get go. As any discerning person, try to understand the history
and background before going off on a crazed rant that defies logic.If you want meaningful dialog, understand some basics of American law. What
may be a fantasy repeated by Donald Trump as a means of dealing with a problem
is illegal. Start from there. Either that or continue with the partisan blather
and get nowhere. Problem solving does not begin with ignoring the problem.
The opposition to this consideration is interesting. It is like a burglar
breaking into your house and then demanding to have the right to pick which
bedroom he will use, what he will have for dinner and insist on the control of
the TV remote. He further wants his children to be educated in your living room
and medically cared for in your kitchen. The Democrats are OK with letting the
illegals choose where in the country they will live, they are OK with the
illegals’ expectation of citizen paid education and health care and
certainly insist on their right to refuse those who disagree a chance to voice
their opposition. The clearly better solution was what Obama said years ago:
“this is a crisis” and we need to complete the border barrier. If we
don’t let them in then they don’t have to be disappointed by living
in San Francisco or Chicago. As you can see from the comments, citizens
don’t want to transfer illegals to San Francisco, the want them
transported out of the country. They want to have control of their homes and
the TV remote too. Any comparison of illegals location to San Francisco and the
tragic relocation of citizens to Topaz is both misguided and outrageous. Shame
"You leftists really, really hate the idea of illegal immigrants in your own
neighborhoods, don't you? Why is that? "I think it's a
great idea, but you righties are only interested in the political game. If you
are seriously going to do this, allow these people to legally work and be
productive members of the community. Otherwise, all you are doing is creating
a bigger problem.
@Craig Clark: "....threatening to use Presidential power for punitive
purpose..."Why would an influx of immigrants be considered
"punitive" ? That sounds racist.
How can this possibly be called "dehumanizing" ? Sanctuary cities
apparently really do think that immigration laws don't need to be enforced,
and that "diversity is their strength". They should be delighted to be
getting more highly industrious and law-abiding people.
You leftists really, really hate the idea of illegal immigrants in your own
neighborhoods, don't you? Why is that? And why do you insist
that the rest of us have to have them?Besides, Trump isn't
doing anything Obama didn't do: Obama "resettled" illegals
primarily in areas to "punish" conservatives. You leftists all cheered
wildly. Now you think it's a bad idea? Come on, how
hypocritical can you be?
Sending them to cities that want to take care of them seems no wrong. Sending
them there so it appears sanctuary cities are attracting them is what seems to
be have been in the works. Spinning the facts, falsifying the record, duping the
public, and making the sanctuary cities look bad -- those are things outside of
honesty. -- John Jackson (aka Immifriend)
This sounds like a trial balloon released to see who he can make yell. But
threatening to use Presidential power for punitive purposes just adds to the
mounting evidence that the U.S. Presidency is currently in the hands of someone
who lacks the mental and emotional maturity to run the country like a
responsible leader is obligated to do.
I think he should include those states who have created actual laws to protect
people from immediate deportation. They are making it harder to remove people
who are here illegally. Hint: If this happens, Utah will be a much more popular
Some extremely shallow thinking going on today. Using people as political
footballs, just one more low for the Trump side show and his enablers in the
right nationalist party.
Has anyone noticed that next year is a census year? EVERYONE is counted, not
just citizens, in redistributing the 435 seats in the House of Representatives.
So what I don't understand is why anyone would object to a
population boost, especially one that won't significantly affect the voter
makeup, going into a census year. It seems like a massive boon to wherever the
immigrants go if it actually gets carried out. Red and blue areas should be
clamoring to take in immigrants/refugees over the next year, with the bonus that
they'd look magnanimous.
Brilliant idea. I’ll bet Trump can get conservatives to provide pick and
delivery to the sanctuary cities. I’ll happily do so.
Ok, JaneB: Tell us how "repulsive" a plan this is. What's
"Dehumanizing" about taking these illegal immigrants and letting them go
in a place where the local politicians claim to love, love, love illegals and
want to give them everything? I mean, according to the left Trump
voters and Trump states are subhuman racists who slaver at the thought of
hanging all illegal immigrants and probably eating them. Why aren't you
leftists happy at the idea that you can save some poor Honduras gang member who
only wants to steal and rape an American citizen (hey, they share the same goals
as Chuck Schumer!) from evil white Trump supporters?Since liberals
love, love, love high taxes, surely they wouldn't complain about their
taxes being raised so these poor illegals can collect welfare, free everything,
and then complain about how we Americans aren't giving them enough stuff.
Mr. trump's plan?Mr. trump has no plan.Mr. trump
gets up everyday and decides who is going to punish.The best part of
the whole sordid affair is that he will not be potus forever.Eventually he will be just like the rest of us who somehow manage to live day
after day without all of the protections he now hides behind.Someday
he will have the same protection those people have who get loaded onto a bus and
shipped off to somewhere which includes really no protection at all. Eventually the day will come when the punisher will become the punished.What goes around will eventually come around for all of us including Mr.
Win, win. The refugees get what they want (protection) and the sanctuary cities
get what they want (votes).
President Trump, you the man. This is a fantastic idea. These sanctuary
city's should be all over this. Unless of course as usual they're
just shooting their mouths off about being a sanctuary city. Trump 2020
I think it's a great idea, but understand that it needs to include the 8
sanctuary states, the numerous sanctuary counties, as well as the sanctuary
cities. Send these people there and allow them to find a job and pay taxes.
But we all know that this is just a cheap political threat.
This is the perfect solution!
So the left won't help with a solution at the southern border other than to
simply open it to whomever and however many show up. The system and
infrastructure is overwhelmed and still no solutions from the left. So the
President offers to bring the lawbreakers to sanctuary cities and all the
lefties call foul. Just incredible. If the left gets its way the U.S. will
look more like Russia or China very soon. I wonder how the complicit media will
Now this: Trump told CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan that he would pardon him
if he ever went to jail for following Trump's directive to block migrants
from entering US, a violation of federal law.Um, there are no words
@captainA: You see what you want to see. There have been numerous ideas from
both sides (some even closely resembled compromise) but those ideas have all
been shot down via veto. This is in no way a viable alternative. The amount of
money spent shipping these individuals to San Francisco and New York would be
astronomical. Not to mention the fact that the resources aren't there to
support it. Perhaps we find viable ways to citizenship for those who meet
specific criteria? That could help. You want progress on this, and so do I, but
this is a ploy to rally the constituents, not a valid plan.
Sanctuary cities take great pride in their name and their progressive thinking
until they are actually called upon to provide sanctuary.
What's truly pathetic, is that Trump honestly has no idea how repulsive
this is. No clue.Trump is unhinged. You want 4 more years of him
destroying whatever is left of norms, laws, decency? He's filling the
government with sycophants, toadies, and extremely unqualified people. The only
qualification is to know they will him ask how high to jump. Plus, we know there
is no bottom to Trump. None.Anyway, Trump literally has. no.
concept. of. decency. He calls these migrants animals, and says it's an
infestation. R's had two years to fix immigration, it's
not a democrat problem.
Seems perfectly logical. Why wouldn’t sanctuary cities be into this?
Let's see, illegals coming here can't be deported due to radicle
judges and sanctuary cities. This proposal makes PERFECT sense. What the left
is concerned about is that it will not "expand" their political base. I
mean how more democrat can a sanctuary city be. They want these illegals to
flood the populated Blue States in order to change the voting electorate. Trump
is brilliant and that infuriates liberals. I think it's a PERFECT solution.
They want to be here, so let those who are screaming the loudest to have them
her, have them.
I dont understand why this proposed step of sending illegal aliens to some
sanctuary cities would be illegal. These illegal aliens have to be released
somewhere so they need to balance out the burden on different communities.
Sanctuary cities support illegal aliens so that is a good place for them to
go.I understand that cost might be issue but that is not a legal
issue. Why would Democrats object to taking responsibility for the
problems they are creating.
Amazing, isn't it? Democrats suddenly don't want these people in
their cities, in their homes? Why not? They demand that we all accept being
overrun by this horde and migration, but they don't want to participate?Besides, isn't it racist of them to not welcome all the unlimited
hordes of migrants? Thats what they call everyone who ever says anything
against importing unlimited millions of people... so I guess they are racist for
not wanting them in their cities?In fact, isn't Trump doing
these migrants a favor here by letting them go in a city that promises they can
rob, steal, rape and murder without fear of punishment? Wouldn't these
illegal immigrants love to be in a city where they're immune from the law?
What's the downside here? Why are leftists upset by this idea?
Sure, they will be victimized tremendously, but isn't that what they want
for all the rest of us? Why aren't the left willing to put up and take one
for America, considering they demand we let these people in? The left should
take care of them, right? Surely you leftists wouldn't be hypocritical
What's wrong libs? Your sanctuary cities are intended to give cover to the
illegals and Trump is helping you out by delivering more of the people you care
most about, the illegals! This should be dream come true to the liberals but now
you oppose receiving the very people you created the sanctuary cities for?
Really? What a bunch of hypocrites!
Trump keeps making proposals for different situations, and all I see from the
"Liberals" is complaining and no help in finding solutions.The old
saying roughly If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the
problem.That applies to the so-called Republicans who are really
Trump's solution to illegal immigration is to give them a ride to a US
This sounds a lot like hospitals who don't want to care for indigent
patients putting them on a bus and transporting them to other cities and making
it their problem. Personally, Donald Trump should move them to his resorts and
let them set up refugee camps on the golf course fairways. Imagine the hundreds
of tents set up to make play on the course more difficult, complementing the
sand and water traps.Not only is this another Trump stupid idea, but
like any attempt to restrict people in our very mobile society, I thought he was
saying there was no room. Is this now a change in the official line changing on
a moments notice? It is understandable that Trump doesn't like and wants to
punish those who stand against him, but when Lou Dobbs presents fake popularity
polls, it gives Trump the sense he can do anything he wants and lets his
hallucinations run wild.Really, this is just more nonsense coming
out of the White House. Ignore it. Maybe the reality of the various
investigations is again rising up in his paranoid mind with the coming release
to the public of the Mueller report and he sees that people may not be very
satisfied with it. Also, there's always the tax returns.
I haven't read Trump's book, "The Art of the Deal", but it
sure seems like his negotiation style is to aim for a "Lose-Lose"
I have to respectfully disagree with the activist, there's nothing more
dehumanizing about than what is already going on. “But you'll
overwhelm the cities" and you don't think that's exactly what is
going to happen to every other place we try to dump these people off at? The
resources aren't there, and no amount of good intentions and compassion is
going to materialize it out of thin air no matter how much you spread it out. If
San Francisco doesn't deserve why does El Paso or some small community in
the middle of the country?Give the Sanctuary Cities what they want,
and preach to everyone about. From where I stand the activists either need deal
with the reality of the problem they've made or stop grandstanding with
other people's money.
The rules of laws mean nothing to Trump. To say nothing about the rules of
It is dehumanizing. Trump's attitudes toward people in general are
dehumanizing. He objectifies women, belittles anyone who disagrees with him,
uses the poor as political footballs, and cares nothing for the rule of law!Trump is a dehumanizing person!