Contrary to democrat media hysteriaThe report is being released - after it
is redacted (in accordance to the law and security protocol)
Why didn't Democrats demand all of Hillary's e-mails?
The results of the mueller probe confirm's everyone's suspicion.Fake dossier + no american's indicted for treason = no
collusion.The left and their tabloid media have so much egg on their
face they should open a denny's.
Impartial7 - "You have to wonder why Trump goes to great lengths and
expense to hide this report, his tax returns and his school grades. He's
such a braggart, if things are really so great he'd post them all over the
place. I think we all know why he doesn't."Why did Obama
hide everything about his college experience?
A nation can survive its fools, even the ambitious. But it cannot survive
treason from within....for the traitor appears not to be a traitor...he rots the
soul of a nation...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer
resist.Marcus Tullius Cicero(Trump and his family have
worked to closely with Russians to be trusted. It is only a matrer of time
before he is fully exposed.)
Barr is going to release everything he is allowed to by law and he is going to
do it correctly so that he doesn't leave himself open for more foolish
criticism than he has already received for doing his job correctly thus far. So
the democrats should just chill out. And Pelosi says they are just
scareby-cats. Boy, what a powerful statement. I haven't heard that one
since I was in grade school.
The American taxpayers have paid for the Muller Report, now release it!!!
Why didn't Democrats demand all of Hillary's e-mails or why Obama
pardoned tens of thousands convicted criminals?
Craig Clark - Boulder, COMarch 28, 2019 2:55 p.m.Investigations can be ugly and are always one sided. If your neighbor accused
you of something like that and they interviewed your ex-wife and some of her
friends and maybe made your medical history part of the investigation, you would
not want all of that made public. Demanding the full report is a
ruse, because the democrats know very well some classified stuff and grand jury
testimony cannot be made public. They will then run around saying "See! See!
They're hiding something!"
2 bits: "You all know Dems won't be satisfied with the hole report
either... right?"No, they won't, especially if it has a 300
page "hole" in the 300 page document.Let's see the
whole thing so that we can move on. It only took 2 days before Ken Starr's
report was released, in its entirety.Trump wants to vindicate
himself and his suspicious actions. The Republicans need to get out of the way
and let that happen by releasing the entire report.
@Leonidas"Do the Dems really think Barr's summary is materially
different in content than Mueller's report?"I think that
saying that Trump isn't recommended for indicted (when Mueller's team
followed the notion that a sitting President can't be indicted so even if
he did something bad enough that he could he wouldn't) but that he's
not exonerated when it comes to obstruction of justice suggests there's a
wide range of possibility in the report when it comes to obstruction. It could
be something on the order of criticism of judgement (similar to that with the
Clinton emails), and it could be a report outlining the case for obstruction
that builds the road to impeachment. Obstruction's rather
different than collusion, since collusion can't really be Trump alone, but
obstruction, that's all him, the absence of anyone else being indicted
(that we know of, pieces have been farmed to offices but those tend to be
separate from the principle focus) tends to rule out collusion but doesn't
rule out obstruction.And some of the point of the release is to
figure out what did go on.
People on both sides want the full report; however, to get the really full
report, there must be no redactions. At this point, having seen redactions in
other reports, which appeared mostly to cover FBI embarrassments, and after two
years, real security issues are highly doubtful.
Wouldn't you say there is some hypocrisy at play when the same herd of
people can't understand how to reduce a 300 page document to 4 pages are
the same ones who only took 36 hours or so to produce and pass a 2700 page
health care bill. "We have to pass it to find out what is in
Are Republicans "scaredy-cats" as charged? Yes, but not in the way one
may think. They are afraid NOT to stand by Trump regardless of what he does or
says. Moral courage in the GOP is an expendable commodity.
Do the Dems really think Barr's summary is materially different in content
than Mueller's report? Mueller hasn't gone anywhere. He is still
around. Do you not think he would be screaming all over CNN if Barr's
summary was off base? Come on. Get over it and wipe the egg off your face.
This is just political grandstanding. The report isn't being
"hidden" or "supressed"- the law says you have to remove
sensitive or classified information before making such a report public. AG Barr
is just following the law.It won't do you any good to keep beating
this horse, Dems. It's already dead.
Guido Pescatore - Layton, UTMarch 29, 2019 6:30 a.m.Between Mike
Lee's antics and the name calling from the Democrats, it appears that we
have lost all sense of decorum in Washington. It's time for us voters to
enact the term limits we find at the ballot. Let's stop voting for the 2
major parties!====Mr. Pescatore, you forgot the mention
the most obvious source of name-calling.Why just use the ballot to
limit trump's term, too.While I do agree with your last
sentence, where do we find another one? Wouldn't it be wonderful if we
could expand the United Utah Party to the United America Party?
After having called for full release of the report BEFORE the summary, now
members of the GOP are strangely silent.Why?
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something,
sometime in your life." Winston Churchill"I
bring out the worst in my enemies and that's how I get them to defeat
themselves." Roy M. Cohn(Thid, living in a
divided world is not winning.)
Between Mike Lee's antics and the name calling from the Democrats, it
appears that we have lost all sense of decorum in Washington. It's time
for us voters to enact the term limits we find at the ballot. Let's stop
voting for the 2 major parties!
Democrats are setting themselves up for yet another huge disappointment! The
full Mueller report will show EXACTLY what AG Barr said it said: "No Russian
collusion/obstruction by President Trump." But I hope you Demos never give
this up, it makes you so easy to defeat in 2020!
I waited to comment to see how Trump defenders would react. That was foolish,
because any attack on the President is defended in predictable ways.First, always perform a "what-about" counter argument.
"Hillary!" is the favorite, but there are others. It is hard to think
your hero is as guilty as is the subject of your what about.Counter-attack with name calling. "Socialists!" another favorite.
Invoke a bogeyman to distract. Or insult the Presidential tormentor. Note to
Conservatives, this is a Trump tactic. Apparently you like to dish it out, but
can't take it. See Pelosi comments that cause such angst in the minds of
Trump friends.Thirdly, avoid talking about the substance of the
controversy. Drag in extraneous, usually doubtful "evidence" into the
discussion to obfuscate. This is the obvious corollary to "what
about'ism, but needed to deflect the obvious debate away from obvious
truth.Which brings me to #4, which is to shade and sometimes
outright misrepresent the truth of things. I would also add strip any context
out of the words or actions of the political debate opponent. Classic
Trump'ian tactic learned from the master (Trump).
The Republican PartyThe Grand Old PartyThe Party of LincolnThe Putin Party
Rep. Adam Schiff's response to the Republicans on the House Intelligence
Committee was spectacular. One rock solid fact after another, boom, boom, boom.
Each fact already a part of the public record, and ignored or glossed over by
partisan sycophants. I don't know who the Repub was that
attempted to speak after this devastating fusillade, but I noticed that he
wasn't seeking to refute the facts. No, he instead sounded defensive about
Schiff's characterization of Trump apologists as being okay with the
immoral, unethical, and unpatriotic behavior he'd just detailed.Then show us you're not okay with it, Trump supporters. I don't
hear you refuting the facts of the behavior. You're not pretending these
things didn't happen. So present your case. How are these things okay?
(FYI, if your instinct is to go to whataboutisms, these aren't a defense.
They're an admission.)
Impartial7, I trust you don't know that many parts of the report can't
be handed out due to restrictions of law. But the law never stopped Democrat
liberals. Speaking of tax returns and school grades, I would love to have seen
Obama's taxes from day one and find out how a guy that has never worked
turned into a multimillionaire and of course we never saw his grades or
applications for enrollment at his big time colleges.
Schiff and Swalwell are attorneys who should know that the Mueller Report is
governed by a different statute than the Starr Report. Mueller and Barr are
following the law that governs them in not immediately releasing the entire
report just as Starr was following a different statute in releasing his report
to Congress. Those calling for the immediate release of the Mueller
Report are ignoring the law. I believe Schiff, Swalwell, and their ilk know the
law but they'd rather engage in demagoguery, getting those ignorant of the
law riled up while they continue to lie to the public and think they can apply
the law only when it suits them.
Everything Schiff said today in response was true. Everything.
Barr is not an independent jurist...a legal equivalent of General Mattis...who
was widely respected across the political spectrum for non-partisanship. He applied for his job by writing a glowing memo opposing a special counsel
investigation. The entire report must be revealed, at least to the
Congress.After all, if Trump and his team will lie about matters that can
be easily refuted...like the size of his inaugural crowd...how can he or his
team be trusted about matters that cannot be refuted, such as what the Mueller
report really says? I would think an innocent man would want the whole
report revealed, so the matter would drop and truly be forgotten. But if
you grew up in Queens County, as I did, and saw how the Trump family conducted
themselves for years...even lying about the number of floors in their apartment
buildings...you would know how much Donald Trump's assurances were worth.
The Mueller Report was really the obituary for the Democratic Party.Some
within the family refuse to believe in the death until they read the full
obituary, but the deceased cannot be revived no matter how carefully they
scrutinize and try to pick apart the words of the obituary.
We need term limits BIG TIME!
Anyone who can read should understand what the AG put in his first letter to
congressional leaders. He is bound by law, regulation and practice. He will
release what meets these guidelines.
Release the Mueller report. RIght now, accusing Schiff of anything is a bit like
accusing the President of being born abroad just because you don't like
@lost in DCI don't know who HVH refers to; I meant that Trump lies
repeatedly. Trump himself says he wants it released (so anyone can take that and
say "Trump says he wants it released") but actions don't seem to
sync up with that. @2bits"All I've heard him say is
he wants the full report released ASAP!"So have I. I've
heard him say lots of things that were completely and blatantly false, not even
in a partisan view sense, in an objective reality sense. His word, like his
promises, as Romney would note, is as useless as a degree from Trump University.
@2 Bits - shouldn't Adam Schiff be allowed to substantiate the
extraordinary claims he's making? Or is it in the best
interests of the American people to banish the accuser?Let's
see the report, let's see where Chairman Schiff's committee's
work leads before we smother him and disregard the accusation.
@Harrison Bergeron:Rather than taking only the opinion of the police
officer, or the chief of police, or the local politican attorney... perhaps the
neighbors should be able to access the full evidence of the claim. Right? Just
firing the police office wouldn't fully clear your name, would it? Rather than calling for Adam Schiff to resign, why won't
Republicans allow We the People to view the full report, just like Trump said we
should be able to, within the last week?
Craig Clark: “GOP attacks on him are because he is touching a nerve that
has Republicans fidgeting.”Absolutely, it touches a nerve.
Weaponizing our national security apparatus for political purposes definitely
touches a nerve. It’s that nerve that reminds people of a banana republic
where the ruling party uses the military, intelligence agencies and law
enforcement to spy on, demonize and subdue the opposition. Imagine
if you had a neighbor who didn’t like you and was also a police officer.
And what if that neighbor used his position of power to tell your neighborhood
that he had access to information that proved you were a child abuser? This is
what Adam Schiff did with his position on the intelligence committee. So yes,
this definitely touches a nerve. It should touch everyone’s nerves who
love freedom. If we allow this type of behavior we eventually become Venezuela,
Cuba or Russia.
mcclarknice change of subject – we are not talking about
congressional investigations, but investigations by special investigators /
prosecutors. Very different animals.FrozenHVH lies? I often
disagree with him, and liberals often state half-truths or put forth
obfuscations. Hmm – thanks for the heads up! BO was the perfect example
of liberals who had trouble with truth. And nancy would not know the truth if it
bit her – especially if it disagrees with her idea of what she wants it to
@Fred44I didn't say what's in the Mueller Report is obvious. I
said that this is not just oversight is obvious, and it is.Schiff
isn't out to protect Americas elections. He's out to get the
President, and that's obvious. That's not oversight.Oversight isn't trying to take out the President by any means possible.
Oversight is reviewing executive decisions.Google "congressional
oversight definition"...---"Congressional oversight includes
the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs,
activities, and policy implementation"...Oversight is not taking
out the President by any means possible (Which is Schiff's goal).Oversight is reviewing Exec Branch decisions. Not organizing coups.Congress oversight is an integral part of the American system of checks and
balances. But it's not there to carry out a partisan coup.Partisans are ruining the traditional checks and balances oversight by
replacing it with partisan witch hunts and endless attempts to take out the
President.Schff doesn't want oversight. He wants Trump's
Must be tough to be a liberal these days. When Trump joked for the Russians to
find the Hillary 33,000 lost email, the dems jumped all over the joke as their
best evidence of collusion. When that failed as evident by the Mueller's
report - the dems has now zero in on the 300 page long report as their best
Harrison Bergeron,"The Intelligence Committee will be a dysfunctional
mess as long as Schiff is there. He could be reassigned to the Climate Committee
or something where he can’t really harm our national security or our
country. But he has to resign or be kicked from that committee for the good of
the country."____________________Schiff is not likely going to
be forced to resign. GOP attacks on him are because he is touching a nerve that
has Republicans fidgeting.
@ Fred44You have misread the source of that quote. It’s a
direct quote from the LA Times. Go back and read it carefully. Schiff used his position of power and access to intelligence for political
gain. For two years he ran around saying “I have access to special
information that proves Trump is a traitor.” He owns a significant amount
of the blame for making a large part or the country actually believe the
President of the United States was a traitor and a puppet to Russia. Many who
comment here were duped by this hoax, often even using the term
“Putin’s puppet” in reference to the President. So
now he has turned the House Intelligence Committee into a political circus. All
nine of the Republicans on the committee “have no faith in [his] ability
to discharge [his] duties in a manner consistent with [his] Constitutional
responsibility.” This includes Utah’s own Chris Stewart. The Intelligence Committee will be a dysfunctional mess as long as Schiff is
there. He could be reassigned to the Climate Committee or something where he
can’t really harm our national security or our country. But he has to
resign or be kicked from that committee for the good of the country.
I feel the country needs to move on and address real issues now.But
in order to move on, the full report should be released to Congress and possible
the entirety released to the public.
2 bits,You said "This is Way beyond "Oversight" now.
That is obvious.This is not oversight anymore. This is an attack on
the President of the United States." Do you know what is in the
report? Do you know what the various Democrats on the various committee's
may know?This looks a lot like an opinion on your part not backed up
by any information. Could you share the report or some links to the information
that allowed you to obvious to you that this has gone way beyond oversight. Sounds like a partisan position to me rather than anything factual you
can prove. I personally am not satisfied with Barr's 4 page summary of
Mueller's 300 page report especially with Barr's past comments about
whether a sitting President can be indicted as well as his comments on the
Mueller Investigation before he became the AG. He left a lot of questions
@2bits;"All I've heard him say is he wants the full report
released ASAP!You Assume he won't release the report... He's
said he wants the report released."Yeah, he said he'd sit
down with Mueller. He didn't. He said he'd release his tax returns, he
didn't. He said Mexico would pay for the wall, they didn't. Trump has the authority to release the report, right now. But wait. He'll
go to great lengths to keep it hidden. You should know by now, what Trump says
and what he does are usually opposites.
@lost in DC"And as HVH says, trump wants the report released."Except he doesn't. He lies. Frequently. His lawyers and McConnell
are taking steps to block it. If he wanted it released it'd be released.
@endoftimes"Mr Muller was the lefts' big hero until
the results didn't go the way they want, now a big villain?"The left doesn't consider Mueller a villain. And the only reason there
are talks about calling him in to testify would only be for informative purposes
if the report is kept secret or is heavily redacted, not as any sort of judgment
of him. Barr's summary notes there weren't any times when a Mueller
request was deemed unreasonable, so I guess if we want false criticism of
Mueller, we should be looking at Trump and the GOP that railed against him for
Do people really understand the politic's of this govt? The term politics
is the debate or opinion or conflict among individuals or parties having or
hoping to achieve power. I think the focus word in this definition
is "Conflict", that said I think the democrats are not dumb they have
law degree's, they understand the rules of law and they clearly understand
that the attorney general is not allowed to release the mueller report in
it's entirety, mr barr is required by law to redact and withhold
information pertaining to the grand jury and anything regarding national
security cannot be divulged in this report to the public, the congress I am sure
will be allowed to view in private.So for the dems to be making this
silly demand is nothing but politics pitting and sewing public discord and
conflict among detractors and supporters of donald trump.William
Barr will release the report as much of it as legally possible when the above
said redactions have been completed.Then all of the trump haters can
actually see for themselves what kind of farce this investigation really was.
@Lost in DC. It would seem that you are unaware of the seven, thats right, seven
Republican led congressional investigations of Hillary. They all found no wrong
doing by her.
The thing about the report is that it's operating under the notion that a
sitting President cannot be indicted. So of course Mueller was never going to
recommend indictment. One should assume that Barr is at least reasonably
accurate in the summary. Whatever involvement with Russia there might be is
likely mostly indirect and falls somewhere on the order of the criticism of
judgment of Clinton for her emails.Obstruction though, that one is
different. There wasn't an obstruction indictment recommended for Nixon
(similar notion, president can't be indicted) and the reports didn't
say to impeach Nixon for obstruction. It laid out enough evidence that it built
a case for impeachment. Barr's summary noting that it doesn't
exonerate Trump with a report that can't indict leaves a wide range.
Perhaps it's like the Clinton emails where there's criticism of
Trump's behavior but that's about it, or it rises to a level that the
evidence laid out in the report could lead to an impeachment case. We don't
know. Once reasonable redactions (for classified material or
isolated other things) are done the report should be revealed in a few weeks.
@JaneBRE: "GOP says don't believe your lying eyes"...---Where has the GOP said that?Give us something we can
google to see if it's true or just something you made up in your own
mind.===RE: "The GOP wants to sweep this under the
rug, saying there's nothing to see here"...---Can you show
us where anybody in the GOP said they want to sweep this under the rug?Can
you show us where anybody in the GOP said there's nothing to see here?Are these Assumptions? Assuming you know what they are thinking? Or
did they actually say the things you pretend they said?===Some Democrats are becoming unhinged. Which is strange that they would
become even more unhinged, when Mueller and even the liberal media (not just
the GOP) said the investigation "Categorically found there was no collusion
with Russia".Obstruction is still out there. But if Mueller
couldn't draw a conclusion... how can you?===RE:
"Congress has a constitutional responsibility for oversight"...---This is Way beyond "Oversight" now. That is obvious.This is not oversight anymore. This is an attack on the President of
the United States.Mueller was oversight. This is beyond oversight.
"What part of NO crimes do the socialist lefties not understand?"Ah yes. "Socialist."The new boogy man of the right
wing.How much dumber can this all become?I'm afraid
we're gonna find out.
The dems are desperate for good news after promising indictment and
impeachment... now they discover 300 pages long is their next "savior",
Yup. Bring it.
The only people who don't want it released are those that would want things
to stay hidden.
You all know Dems won't be satisfied with the hole report either...
right?When they get the whole report... they will just want more.The full report is just the map for where to dig. Who/what needs
subpoenas to appear before them so they can question them more and more in hopes
of breaking them or getting something they can use in the media for a few days,
or for the election.They will want all the underlying documents
next. Every email, every conversation, every deposition, every rumor, every bit
of information that can be used...It's just destroying our
country IMO.And yes I know Trump is not a good-guy. But is it worth
destroying our country and dragging America through all this to get your
"Enemy"?Just wait for the election Dems. It's not
that urgent.===Who has done more damage to America and
our confidence in our leaders? Dems in Congress? Or Russian Trolls writing
derogatory articles about Hillary Clinton?I think Russian Trolls
buying $100,000 in advertisements on facebook did less damage to America than 2
years of non-stop attacks on our leaders from the Adam Schiffs in Congress and
people in the American press working this agenda every day.
To make an informed decision based on the report, it is necessary to read it in
its entirety. Otherwise, "conclusions" are based on hearsay,
speculation and a vague and self-interested summary. That this is
even an issue shows the depths to which we have descended. Do you want to be
told what something means or actually do the research for yourself?
@Impartial7Trump didn't hide any report. And with regards to
school grades, do mean like the way Barry sealed his transcripts? Oh yeah I get
it now. It's only bad to not come out with anything if it is on the other
side of the isle. Open mind much?@JaneBFirst of all,
you and not one other person on the earth "saw it with your own eyes."
It is pure speculation at this point until proof and facts are available. And
if there were proof and facts, you should know that it would not have been kept
under wraps. Personally, I don't care if it does or does not get
released.But since you bring up the oversight committee. I tell you
what, how about we release the report when we can get Hillary's emails she
destroyed, and her phones, and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Barr's synopsis that cleared President
Donald Trump of campaign collusion with Russia and criminal obstruction of the
federal probe "condescending" and "arrogant."____________________Speaker Pelosi is showing more restraint and
temperance than I would. Barr's four page summary is starting to sound more
like a smokescreen if not an outright coverup.
@Impartial7 7:10RE: "You have to wonder why Trump goes to great
lengths and expense to hide this report"...---What great length
or expense has Trump taking to hide this report? Details please.All I've heard him say is he wants the full report released ASAP!You Assume he won't release the report... He's said he wants
the report released.You Assumed he was about to fire Mueller... yet
he never did.You make so many Assumptions that don't pan out.
Is that from listening to Democrat Talking Points in the media? Or were they
your own Assumptions?===Adam Schiff sees the US
President as the "Enemy" (same as Russia). Trying daily to shake our
confidence in our leaders, and our institutions (same as the Russians).Do we want people who see our government and our leaders as the
"Enemy" in Congress?It's gone beyond oversight for Adam
Schiff. He sees Trump as the Enemy (not ISIS or Russia).When we
have people in congress trying to undermine our leaders (same thing Russian
Internet Trolls were trying to do)... that's a problem.It's not oversight to him anymore. Taking out our President has become
his full time job (same as Russian trolls).He should step down.
Full and complete Ken Starr report was released, including with grand jury info.
So yes, we need to see the full report, and all of the evidence and grand jury
info. All. of. it. The GOP wants to sweep this under the rug, saying
there's nothing to see here. But obviously there's a lot to see. Else
why would Mueller specifically say that he did not exonerate Trump on
obstruction. We know there was obstruction because we saw many instances of it
with our own eyes.GOP says don't believe your lying eyes. Congress has a constitutional responsibility for oversight. Let them do
Three hundred plus pages, not one of which has been provided to Congress, much
less to the American public. Barr offers as a substitute his own four page
summary and we're supposed to see that as providing Congress all that it
needs to determine if there are evidentiary grounds for impeachment?No reasonable person is going to swallow that.
Harrison, when you said "If they choose to plow forward, they will look like
unhinged conspiracy theorists hellbent on proving themselves right." I
thought for a minute you were talking about Donald Trump and his birtherism.
@ WeThePeople"300 pages? that's way too long. How could
anyone have time to read that?"Some people consider intellectual
curiosity a strength. Other people prefer Robert Mueller drew a few
pictures with crayons.
Cougfan60No indictments of hilary – of course not, holder and lynch
were political operatives who declined to press charges. The only hypocrisy was
from holder and lynch.
Release the entire report. Let the people decide if they want to re-elect Dear
300 pages? that's way too long. How could anyone have time to read
that?I'm grateful to the attorney general for telling us the
important information. Trump is Innocent. NO COLLUSION. Now can we move on?
@ImpartialBecause he's not required to. Period
Consider this from the LA Times:“
no matter how
disappointed the Schiffs and Swalwells are now, they must issue mea culpas for
dividing the country – to begin to heal this nation today and prepare a
clean slate for the next Democrat to occupy the Oval Office. If they choose to
plow forward, they will look like unhinged conspiracy theorists hellbent on
proving themselves right. Schiff in particular ought to, at a minimum, step down
from the House Intelligence Committee. Honestly, he should probably just resign
from Congress in shame.”
You have to wonder why Shiff goes to great lengths and expense to continue to
investigate the NO collusion, No obstruction report. Mr Muller was the
lefts' big hero until the results didn't go the way they want, now a
big villain?As far as the investigation, since when does anyone have
the right to request FISA, (foreign intelligence surveillance) warrants
(illegally I might add)? Mike Flynn was trapped with a procedural so called lie
to the FBI, McCabe. Flynn asked if he would need a lawyer, macabe said no, just
a few questions, we'll talk right here in the white house. That's
entrapment, he had no time to prepare because he could not immediately remember
a technical question. An honorable US General officer that served his whole
life, now in $5M in debt.By the way its not illegal to do
international business with any country like Russia when you have international
hotels, golf courses and resorts. The President pulled out of operational
duties before the election.What part of NO crimes do the socialist
lefties not understand?
lost in DC - West Jordan, UT, aren't you being a little bit hypocriticasl
here?The investigations into Hillary have gone on for years and
ZERO, yes ZERO convictions or indictments.Mueller's is two
years long and 34 individuals associated with Trump have been charged in 199
indictments.And you claim that Mueller didn't find anything?Trump said he would release his taxes. He has NOT! That is a lie in my
book, and that of honest, decent, and moral people who hold this man
accountableIt takes a massive amount of cognitive dissonance and
deflection to say otherwise. Nice attack on Imperial7. Trump has
not released his taxes. He brags about his grades but wont release them. And
one of his former instructors said things about him that are not printable in
the Deseret News.Trump doesn't want the Mueller report
released. Saying that he does tells us he is unable to have it done? Why? Is
Mitch covering for him? Release the whole report to the American
public. Let Congress address the issues of obstruction that Mueller left wide
open. And then your side can go investigate Hillary again. Jared and Ivanka
are using non secured emails. Why?
Let the dems keep up their drumbeat, sounding and looking sillier all the
time."I would hope the attorney general would not be acting as a
political operative for the president," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Oh, you mean the way holder and lynch were for BO, or the way the IRS
was for BO?Imperial7What do your accusations about his taxes
and school grades have to do with this report? And as HVH says, trump wants the
report released.There you goAnd dems attacked the GOP house
committee doing their job investigating hilary. What’s your point? Do you
honestly think schiff does not have pre-conceptions regarding trump?
Thid,For a minute there I thought you were giving the Republican
Senators good advice as they prepare to launch another round of Clinton
investigations. I would think that 20 years of investigating the Clinton's
and not being able to bring a single charge would be enough, but no, it looks
like Lindsey Graham is going to let Trump convince him to launch another round
Trump doesn’t have the ability to collude with his staff. Why would anyone
think he has the ability to do so with a foreign power?
420 folk want to see it? What a great perspective looking through a fog of
political bias. hate and smoke. ugh
The gop attacks a member of Congress for doing his job.Pathetic.The pre-conceived premise behind barr's quick 48 hour assessment of
a comprehensive 2 year investigation is that a sitting POTUS cannot be
indicted.Perfect.Robert Mueller's conclusion simply
left the door open for the Congress to debate the issue of obstruction.With regard to the issue that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted...the
republican individual currently occupying the WH will not be sitting in the WH
. . . and people in Hell want ice water. . . So the Dems don't want to
acknowledge the time it takes to review and redact items relating to national
security, grand jury testimony, and other pertinent issues. Too bad. They lost
on the 'insurance policy' but they did have two years of significant
distraction and bad MSM attention to Trump The Democrats obviously don't
care if Barr follows the law relating to the special counsel or not; just like
emotional children, they want what they want, when they want it.
There is an old but wise saying often attributed to the Lakota Tribe that says:
" If you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount"! The
Mueller report killed your "horse"! There was no Trump-Russian
collusion/obstruction! Continuing to beat your dead horse is futile. But on the
other hand, what else to you have? No plan, no hope, no vision and no future,
only a dead horse!
420 Folks want to see it.Trump "claims" he want's it
released. (maybe like his taxes)Mitch is blocking it.Mitch appears to have more power than the president.Release it.
And remember Nixon wasn't ever found guilty of knowing/orchestrating the
break in, but for obstruction of justice, the part of the Mueller report being
ignored by Donald and the right wing.
You have to wonder why Trump goes to great lengths and expense to hide this
report, his tax returns and his school grades. He's such a braggart, if
things are really so great he'd post them all over the place. I think we
all know why he doesn't.