So...I'm related to them, and I haven't heard anything about this
being suspicious. Also, Kay and Linda have been married since before I was born
(so 34+ years).
The fire does appear to be suspicious though. They are still investigating the
cause of a fire started in the bedroom of a couple that happen to have a
24-year age difference. There is nothing wrong with that in itself; however, the
story the Sheriff is telling, is based on the word of the only person that
lived. I am not saying this woman should being accused of anything. But, the
stat's are that when one spouse dies in a suspicious circumstance, the
other is always the first suspect. Fire Investigators are very good at what they
do. They quickly know the difference between a natural fire (By accident); or
suspicious. I would think that by this time they pretty much have a cause of the
fire? They have to know if any type of chemicals or something else caught fire.
But, they did not release that information? The article fails to mention basic
information that could be important. They state the ages of the couple, but not
how long they have been married? If they have been married for six months to a
year; or, if they have been married for thirty years! It makes a huge difference
in the investigation. I don't think I am speculating when I say, it sounds
a bit suspicious to me.