Independent analysis gives mixed review on Utah's water data accuracy

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • Genghis Front Royal, VA
    Jan. 31, 2018 5:33 p.m.

    The article should probably define what 'secondary water' is.

  • aghast SYRACUSE, UT
    Jan. 31, 2018 5:10 p.m.

    The time to address this issue is long ago past. We should have been talking about this 30 years ago, or more. When the secondary water systems were established (anywhere in Utah) enough infrastructure should have been put into place to meter those systems.

    With the amount of snowfall we now have, this year is most likely going to tell the true story about water.

  • Red Smith American Fork, UT
    Jan. 31, 2018 3:34 p.m.

    We leak (unaccounted water) about 15 Deer Creeks or enough water for 4 million new people.

    Both culinary and secondary must be metered plus water property taxes must end.

    We need Truth at the Tap. End the 40% hidden water charges which leads to waste and over use.

  • Harrison Bergeron Holladay , UT
    Jan. 31, 2018 3:32 p.m.

    It always concerns me when I read articles like this. California has proven beyond doubt that you cannot conserve your way out of a water shortage or a drought. We need to work on increasing supply. We need to capture the surpluses during the wet years because the dry years surely will follow.

  • Fitz Salt Lake City, UT
    Jan. 31, 2018 3:22 p.m.

    "The auditor stressed, too, that there is a large amount of "unaccounted" water that is lost as it goes through the system to the point of delivery." He talked, along with some independent engineers, important water systems accountability.

    They need to include the water lines. There are still underground water lines (mostly wood or clay) that are over 100 years old. You seem them fail and flood from time to time. It is from Metropolitan District of Salt Lake and Sandy that this comes and it should be dealt with.

    How much leakage are we loosing underground water lines??