marxist - Salt Lake City, UTIt destroys a person's credibility when
they make comments that lack substance. Wishful thinking about an impeachment
that isn't going to happen is meaningless.
Stewart is right to ask this. We If we don't start somewhere cleaning up
the exploitation of people and corruption that goes on in our gov't, it
will never get better. We will never have an accountable and responsible
Fine with me. But let's also have Trump's sex abuse accusers appear
before a Congressional committee. We need to know the substance of Donald
Trump. This would be a good warmup to impeachment.
Liberals-Al Franklin wants a senate ethics investigation because he
knows nothing will happen. Nothing has happened after a senate ethics
investigation in decades. All smoke and mirrors. “ But he said he was
sorry.”He needs to resign. The ends DO NOT justify the means.
And yes, I think Roy Moore should leave too.
I'd like to know about this as well...However, the KEY here is
what will Congressman Stewart DO about it?Based on his response from
both Donald Trump and Roy Moore -- Mr. Stewart will continue to be his
spineless, partisan, coward, self, and not a do darn thing!
LOU Montana - Pueblo, COYou may be right LOU. The Democrats all
wear white, all go to church, and all are very pious. We all know that all
Republicans wear black, beat their wives and kids, and should all belong in
Rifleman, when and who made that implication? The mainstream media, not
including FOX News, is making a clean sweep of any and all sex offenders. Al
Franken called for his own investigation. They are certainly perging their own.
On the Republican side, all we see is dodging, excuses and lies.
Terminate those sex offenders and do the moral thing.Mall stalking
14 year-old little girls?REALLY?How can this possibly be excused?
And I would like to see term limits, and a cap on salaries on Congress, but it
will NEVER happen.They're all too good at watching each others
backs.Could be there will be a lot of "talk", then a lot of
"yeahing, and neighing", but at the end of the day ANY bill that would
expose the fools would, undoubtedly, be eliminated via some sort of manipulative
tactic.THATS what they do best!
Let's start with a legal definition; what is, exactly, sexual harassment?
What is the US and, in our state, the Utah Codes. What was the legal definition
decades ago vs today? Let's move now to what is fact, that is
actual evidence that would pass a judicial trial. Audio or visual evidence that
can prove it happened. But, so far, it is a he said she said issue; that is
hard to find it as sexual agreement. There are some that have acknowledged
their sexual harassment. That should be taken care of.Moving on,
why is this coming our 10, 20, or even up to 40 years ago, people claim, and on
the other side denies, sexual harassment. Why didn't those that claim
sexual harassment just walk out and leave, or more why didn't they go to
the police and the hospital to get taken care of it? There should be a limit
on time to bring this up. And lastly, do journalists get the real
facts or are they just floating around enjoying keeping sexual harassment on the
front page? There are some who have said they were wrong, but when
someone says no they haven't done anything, you better have strong facts to
prove they did it.
@Lou Montana"Post that list like a scoreboard and let Las Vegas take
bets on what side is the worse. "Probably the Republicans. The
Democrats have a lot more elected women and women have much lower likelihood of
being on the list.
A sound move by the congressman and a great example of how Congress follows and
the people lead. In publicly held companies an inclusive, no harassment
atmosphere has been the standard for years. It's only because of
politicians like Trump, Moore, Clinton and Franken and the possibility of them
losing power that they are now concerned with the issue.
Happy Valley Heretic - Orem, UTWhen it comes to immoral behavior you
will find sexual harassment settlements have been made by our good and honorable
members of congress on BOTH sides of the aisle. Some liberals have the
idea that they should only be concerned when Republicans cross the line. We refer to that as a double standard.
Stewart is right....and it is us the taxpayers who pay these people to be quiet.
We have a right to know who these legislators are." It’s
the American taxpayer that’s on the hook, with “no public disclosure
and no consequences for the harasser,” said California Democratic Rep.
Jackie Speier". The money comes from a special U.S. Treasury fund –
and the payouts are kept quiet. That means, those found to be at fault are
publicly shielded and don’t have to pay a penny out of pocket for
Al Frankin requested an immediate ethics investigation of himself.I wonder
if the GOP will follow his lead?
Post that list like a scoreboard and let Las Vegas take bets on what side is the
worse. I want to see how many of my tax dollars was paid out to
victims of perverted behavior.
The laws exempting Congress from Federal sexual harassment laws must end as well
as the cover-up fund.
It would be very interesting to see the list!
What? Chris Stewart votes in lockstep with Donald, "grab em by the
what?" Trump. Where does he get off being righteous on this?
I'm sure there are a lot of people on both sides of the aisle that want to
let sleeping dogs lie.
Follow the money trail and you will expose predators and human traffickers.