A. Scott Anderson: Education needs a unified long-range plan

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • anti-liar Salt Lake City, UT
    Aug. 10, 2014 9:31 a.m.

    Any sensible, long-range plan for education funding must include diligent enforcement of immigration law. This of course means requiring that those in this country illegally return to their lawful countries of residence and take their their American- and foreign-born children with them (children born in this country may choose to return to this country when they become adults). One must admit that a great deal of education dollars are being spent on remedial education of children of illegal aliens and that this is affecting the education of America's children.

  • DLT Davis, UT
    Aug. 9, 2014 8:39 p.m.

    There already is a long range strategic plan for public education. It was approved by the State Board of Education in 2010 and has been updated yearly. The State Board has been implementing that plan with the assistance of the Legislature. In doing so, the State Board has significantly upgraded standards, changed the testing of students to be more productive to both students and teachers, instituted 100% participation in ACT, among others. It is the State Board who is the chief executive over public education. One of the biggest problems, however, is that there are many other parties who want to be in charge and end up diverting Legislative funding to areas not endorsed by the actual decision maker. A good example is this op ed piece. Mr. Anderson notes that a comprehensive plan is being developed and citizens should support it. Notice who is missing from the list of participants? The actual decision maker. The best thing that stakeholders can do is become involved with the State Board. Help move the strategic plan forward.

  • Twin Lights Louisville, KY
    Aug. 8, 2014 7:36 p.m.

    A business leader with insight. Refreshing. Thank you.

  • Sal Provo, UT
    Aug. 8, 2014 6:58 p.m.

    No mention in the article about how the low-funding affects student scores. Utah is not in the bottom in that area. I'm all for more funding, but only for teachers salaries, reducing class sizes, and tech innovation. No more money for administration. We are already too top heavy in this state.

  • Irony Guy Bountiful, Utah
    Aug. 8, 2014 8:40 a.m.

    All for it. But you might want to involve a few school teachers in this massive central planning effort.

  • Really??? Kearns, UT
    Aug. 8, 2014 7:46 a.m.

    Thank you for this article. Most legislative decisions are based on building the economy and bringing new businesses into the state. I don't think our leaders fully understand how much their anti-education policies keep Utah from being the true business leader in the nation. Too many people choose not to relocate to Utah because of how poorly education is funded and the other ridiculous policies imposed on schools. Once we change the mindset of our government leaders, I predict our economy will grow tremendously.