@RanchHandWhat you say seems logical, but the math doesn't
work. If the CEO of my company, for example, donated all of his salary to the
workers he is allegedly cheating, it would amount to about 15 cents an hour for
the rest of us. Does he make more than he needs? Absolutely. But that isn't
the problem. 15 cents an hour isn't going to solve poverty.The
middle class thrives when the economy is moving forward. Raising energy prices
causes the economy to move backwards. One of the biggest problems I see is that
we have an entire political class dedicated to the proposition of making energy
more expensive.Another problem we have is that we have an entire
political class dedicated to the proposition of convincing everyone that
economics is a zero sum game, that the only way anyone can get wealthy is by
taking from others. While there certainly are more than enough people who live
by taking, we shouldn't ignore the tremendous upside the comes from the
creation of wealth.
Okay Mike Richards, this is 100% incorrect."Poverty is a
world-wide problem. It will be cured when the greedy who won't work, learn
to work and the greedy who take advantage of their workers learn that they are
merely stewards of their money, not owners."Poverty will be
solved when the GREEDY people making millions off the backs of those who
ACTUALLY DO THE WORK start sharing the proceeds of those efforts with those who
actually do the work - the poor.When a CEO makes $100M per year, and
the workers are the bottom barely get by WITH government assistance, then you
can denigrate the working poor; until then, Mike YOU are part of the problem.
@procuradorfiscalThe greatest generation lived under the backdrop of
socialist policies that contributed to easy access to education, fair labor
practices, and high import barriers. If you're in favor of those, then good
There are MANY causes of poverty. There's not just one. And
the better question is... what can PREVENT poverty? Taking from others? I
don't think that works. That just breeds even more resentment (on both
sides) and build the presumption of entitlement.IMO attacking the
lack of opportunity is the best approach. Just taking from people who earned
it and giving it to those who didn't... send completely the wrong message
(to both sides of the equation).Now people donating their surpluses
to the needy (voluntarily)... now that sends the exact correct message (IMO)
Sometimes we confuse what actually causes a problem with what really causes that
problem. Poverty, by itself does not cause crime (in my opinion). Too many
good people live lives of poverty without resorting to crime. But what are SOME
of the conditions that can lead to poverty? - Lack of opportunity,
sometimes caused by rejecting or ignoring educational opportunities.- Despair, which some people try to self-medicate with alcohol and/or drugs,
leading to even more employment problems. When people have addictions, they find
a way to feed their addiction, many times resorting to crime.-
Pregnancy resulting from kids"experimenting" with sex who should have
waited until marriage. Those three problems are fixable. Proper use
of opportunities. Moving to an area where jobs are available. Solving problems
for the employer which makes you more valuable. Abstaining from sex until
married.Poverty is a world-wide problem. It will be cured when the
greedy who won't work, learn to work and the greedy who take advantage of
their workers learn that they are merely stewards of their money, not owners.But, crime is a personal decision.
procuradorfiscal, part of the "greatest generation" were the greatest
criminal minds in our history. Poverty is the greatest barrier to quality
education, poverty is the single common thread for recruitment to terrorism.
Just because you rose from the very depths of the lowest doesn't mean you
lived in poverty. Poor maybe, poverty not necessarily. You have a cynical view
of your neighbor if you think all they want is yours. Most of those receiving
food stamps are working and since most middle class wages have been stagnant for
20+ years we are seeing the biggest wage discrepancy in history and more falling
into that lower income bracket. Take off the binders folks. You have straddled
your kids with a trillion + in college debt. You have sent most good paying jobs
to the Orient or somewhere. You have given your country to oligarchs.
Re: "Poverty is the number 1 breeder of crime."If that were
true, then how would one explain America's Greatest Generation? You know,
the one that worked their way through real poverty [not the "I only have 2
big screen TVs poverty," like people complain of today] and the Great
Depression [not today's unemployment compensation-sheltered Obama
recession], won WWII, then built the strongest, most decent, most egalitarian
society in the history of humankind.It's not poverty that
breeds crime. It's failure to adhere to longstanding American values --
faith, hard work, decency, getting an education, taking responsibility, fiscal
frugality, etc., etc.Wouldn't it be great if America returned
to those values, leaving the political/academic victimization industry with the
highest unemployment rates?
@Mike RichardsI was not using poverty to justify crime. Never.However, look at the trends of who is in our prisons. How many of them
came from homes making 6 figure salaries? Poverty tends to breed
crime because the gain to risk ratio is much greater. If I have to steal bread
to feed my family, I am much more likely to commit theft than one who can
comfortably feed theirs.I am not saying poverty is a justification,
but it is the leading cause.
How poor do we need to be to "justify" crime? If we make less in a
month than some people make in a day, does that "justify" crime? If we
work two full-time jobs and still make less than we need to take care of our
family, does that justify crime? If "poverty" were the cause of crime,
then the priests and nuns of the Catholic Church would all be criminals. They
take a vow of poverty. They live their lives serving instead of being
served.Poverty is no excuse for lawlessness. Just because some
people think that robbing is easier than working, is no excuse. Criminals want
something that belongs to someone else. They are content to take that
"something" without working for it or paying for it. That has nothing to
do with poverty.My family was very, very poor. Dad worked three
jobs before moving the family to Salt Lake City, where there was greater
opportunity. He was not a criminal. He never took anything that belonged to
another. Poverty caused him to look for opportunity.
Poverty is the number 1 breeder of crime. Poverty begets poverty.
Crime thus begets crime. It's a vicious cycle that can take generations to
break (visiting the curse upon the 3rd and 4th generations is often referred to
in the Old Testament)That's not to say that people who are well
to do don't commit crime, and those who are in poverty are destined to be
criminals and destitute their whole life; but if you want to lower crime, you
have to do away with poverty.The best way out of poverty is
education. Take the criminal element, and educate them; teach them a trade,
teach them how to be productive and contribute to society so they won't
have a need to resort to crime to deal with their problems.Give kids
in disadvantaged homes increased access to education. We can either pay to
teach them; or we can pay to incarcerate them; either way, we will pay.
Ranch, please list your credentials.
@RanchIt doesn't take an expert to spot a logical fallacy.
Correlation is not the same thing as causation.
Darlene, please list your expert credentials.