I have to agree with daveferr, Columbus, OH - from the article I do not see
where this meeting is historic. I have LDS friends who will attend this meeting,
however, I have yet to hear them refer to this as "Historic" in nature.
However, I will wait to hear from them what they thought after the meeting.
I am looking forward to attending this meeting at my chapel. I will be
interested to see how my ten-year old will handle it. I am also waiting to see
if my teen finds it nice or annoying that she will now be expected to attend two
meetings a year rather than one.
Thank you for highlighting this video. For some reason the church chose to make
this "unlisted" on YouTube so you don't find this video by just
going to their channel. Our family checks the Mormon channel regularly for new
videos! But this one didn't show up.
I don't get it, why is this historic? Will men be invited? Are women
getting the priesthood? If it's because women can now bring their kids (the
female ones), I don't see how that's a big deal.
The male leadership throwing a bone to the Sisters.
This is EXCITING!
6pm MDT time, not MST. ;-)
As Mary Ellen Edmunds expressed:14th Article of Faith:"We believe in meetings - all that have been scheduled, all that are now
scheduled, and we believe that there will yet be scheduled many great and
important meetings. We have endured many meetings and hope to to be able to
endure all meetings. Indeed we may say that if there is a meeting, or anything
that resembles a meeting, or anything that we might possibly turn into a
meeting, we seek after these things."
Salt Lake, we've got a problem...