County Council to discuss proposed annexation to Holladay

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • Shawnm750 West Jordan, UT
    Dec. 30, 2013 10:59 a.m.

    Honestly, I think we need to see more of this. These unincorporated areas need to either join with one of the surrounding cities, or make their own. I would personally like to see more of the former versus the latter, especially where the smaller areas are concerned. It will allow for better distribution of UFD's & UPD's resources, and will ease (theoretically) the tax burden on other county residents who already pay their local cities for these resources IN ADDITION to what they pay the county to have entities serve as support services.

  • citygrrl SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    Dec. 30, 2013 9:06 a.m.

    Ummm, may I be so bold as to ask: why does a photo of the Salt Lake City and County building accompany this article? This building serves only Salt Lake City, and despite its name, no longer has anything to do with the county, including Holladay, East Millcreek or any part of the county outside of the Salt Lake City limits.

  • jcbrad Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 29, 2013 10:42 p.m.

    Point of clarification - the annexation area will continue to be covered by Unified Fire and Police. Except it will be through the contract through the City of Holladay rather than through SL County.