Believe it or not, there are 29 states with more deer collisions than Utah

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • rvalens2 Burley, ID
    Oct. 12, 2013 5:02 p.m.

    "State Farm will put ANY label on you, to justify raising rates. For heaven's sake, they call Dallas, TX a "Tornado Area". Sheesh!!" [email protected]

    I took a trip to the Fort Worth / Dallas area a few years ago and the day I arrived they had a tornado touched down and tear up an older residential area, causing quite a bit of damage. So, yes I would have to agree with State Farm that the Fort Worth / Dallas area is a "Tornado Area."

    However, I have to agree with you about the size of the Texas deer, they are puny. Saw a four point buck cross the road and thought it was a Jackalope. :o)

  • J-TX Allen, TX
    Oct. 11, 2013 8:39 a.m.

    I moved to TX from OR 8 years ago.

    I drive a LOT of miles, and to date have only seen ONE deer carcass by the roadside. I guess that's because the deer down here are PUNY, and most of the pickups will go right over their heads.....

    Everything is bigger in Texas - Except the deer. I swear, I've seen bigger dogs....

  • J-TX Allen, TX
    Oct. 11, 2013 8:04 a.m.

    State Farm will put ANY label on you, to justify raising rates.

    For heaven's sake, they call Dallas, TX a "Tornado Area". Sheesh!!

  • Brave Sir Robin San Diego, CA
    Oct. 10, 2013 2:46 p.m.


    I'm afraid you're giving the DWR - and Utahn in general - far too much credit. According to the average Utahn, if it can't be hunted, shot, packaged in 1 lb. increments, and stored in the freezer, it's not an animal worth having around.

  • sew Herriman, UT
    Oct. 10, 2013 1:02 p.m.

    In regards to the effect of coyotes on the deer population, I reference a Deseret News article from 12/14/2010: "Utah animal trap proposal pits hunters against wildlife advocates". The article addressed the cruelty of animal traps used to decrease the coyote population. According to the founder of "Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife": "There's too many coyotes. They're dramatically reducing the deer population" and they "deliver a steady blow to the hunting industry by killing young deer". Later in the article, Utah’s DWR officials acknowledged that coyote predation is a factor in limiting the size of deer herds, but they disputed some of the claims of the Sportsman’s group. Whatever, from the statistics given, coyotes have a modest effect on the size of the deer population. And, I believe that modest effect is important: a modest decrease in the number of deer dying by automobile impact is worthy and also keeps Utah drivers safer. And, I believe allowing a few more coyote to feed their families is also worthy. As animals, they are sophisticated and intelligent and deserve at least as much of a place in the scheme of preservation as does the deer population.

  • rnoble Pendleton, OR
    Oct. 10, 2013 12:05 p.m.

    From my days as a long-haul truck driver I must say I was surprised that Pennsylvania wasn't first and Ohio and Kentucky didn't tie for second. I always found that Utah was about average; the data suggests better than average so perhaps those efforts at changing deer crossings are doing some good. Still seems like lots of money when it would be much easier to just curtail driving during certain hours at certain locations. Or at least educate drivers better about the risks so they can adapt.

    Back east the deer move across the roads at almost anytime but out here I would bet that 90% of deer/vehicle conflicts occur within an hour either side of sunset or sunrise and the rest through-out the night.

    And about those coyotes---really don't have much impact on deer populations. Beyond a few days past birth, the coyote hasn't the propensity to hunt deer as it is a much larger prey than a coyote can handle singly and coyotes do not typically pack hunt. Deer are sharp hooved and quite able to cope with an attacking coyote in defense of its life or its young.

  • sew Herriman, UT
    Oct. 10, 2013 11:45 a.m.

    If you want to see deer, come to Herriman. We enjoyed them at first, upon moving here, and have a photo of nine in our backyard in a fairly dense housing area. Our attitude began to change when we lost perhaps a $1000 in landscaping, mostly in new trees and have since put up fencing. In time, we began to notice one of the reasons we have such a problem: some residents put out food for the deer and plant forage specifically for their enjoyment.
    One animal we do not have a problem with, at least in our neighborhood, is coyotes. Even in downtown Los Angeles, near the park surrounding Dodger Stadium, one could hear them at night and would occasionally see one. Perhaps if the bounty for their pelts were removed, we could enjoy their sounds and sightings here from time to time. They are very intelligent animals living in family groups similar to us humans and, in my opinion, much more interesting than deer. More coyotes = less deer = nature more in balance = fewer traffic collisions involving autos and deer, the current inadvertent method of holding the deer population in check.

  • LoveTheKittens The Middle Of, UT
    Oct. 10, 2013 11:42 a.m.

    You must not leave Wasatch Front very often. Too many around my area, 2-3/week.

  • Anon0101 Salt Lake City, UT
    Oct. 10, 2013 9:03 a.m.

    I can't remember the last time I heard of a deer getting hit or seen a carcase on the side of the road in Utah.

  • Willybee71 GARDEN CITY, NY
    Oct. 10, 2013 7:35 a.m.

    I hope these statistics take into account items such as total vehicle miles driven in deer-prevalent sections of road, seasonally and time-of-day adjusted.
    I had the chance to study and implement Deer Control Fencing along N CA Highways, and watched the "Horn-locking" between true Wildlife Biologists and Landscape Architects, and Environmental Activists.
    Be advised that deer are not just "Foragers"; acorns and such, but quite also "Browsers"; young and tender leaves of varying specific varieties. Plant roadside vegetation with thought and care.
    Put your prejudices aside and take the time to respectfully seek the advice of Local Hunters and Provisioners. They know where the deer are, and know their migration paths and patterns.

    Would one rather herd-thinning feed a family, or random road-kills feed landfills ??

  • Eliyahu Pleasant Grove, UT
    Oct. 10, 2013 7:09 a.m.

    If we're 24th (according to the article) or 30th (according to the headline) in deer collisions, it places us right about in the middle, meaning we're average -- not one of the worst. It's all a matter of how the writer wants to set the tone of the article. If there were only one state with fewer deer collisions, for instance, it could say that either we were second best in the nation or that we were among the 49 worst states for deer accidents.

    I've also lived in states where there are bigger animals to worry about. Hitting a cow, a horse, or a moose on the roadway will usually total the car and result in serious injuries to those inside. Deer are lightweights.