Family concerns fuel anti-paparazzi legislation in California

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • CHS 85 Sandy, UT
    Aug. 16, 2013 12:56 p.m.

    I would do anything Jennifer Garner asked me to do. :)

  • I know it. I Live it. I Love it. Salt Lake City, UT
    Aug. 15, 2013 10:27 p.m.

    Shoving your camera in a kids face...
    Spying on a person and their family in their day to day life...

    These things are not "legitimate newsgathering activities".

    They are invasive and criminal. Freedom of the press was meant to protect us, not to allow us to harass people, even if they have become idols the masses worship.

  • elsmere241 Elsmere, DE
    Aug. 15, 2013 6:41 a.m.

    In Italy at least, children who are "private citizens" cannot have their names or faces shown in media. That leads to situations like pictures of Princess Caroline's daughter on a beach with a friend, but the friend's face is blurred out and her name is not mentioned. I don't think that would quite fly constitutionally here, but it might be something to keep in mind.