Two new hotels announced for downtown Salt Lake City

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • MPHS Park City,UT, TX
    Feb. 7, 2014 10:30 p.m.

    So just for everyone who oppose the new downtown convention hotel, either become aware of how much money in the long end it will bring to the state or do your homework and actually become aware that with out a big new hotel we will loose out on tourism money and most likely big conventions like Outdoor Retailers will leave. They have told us just recently they have better places to go if we do not provide more rooms very close. The problem is most big hotels are just to far away!

    For the those who do like the idea, I know some inside scoop it will be a nicer hotel than we have already downtown. Either a big name Hyatt Brand or s Starwood hotel! Support the hotel its the smart thing to do for the future of State Tourism!

  • rnoble Pendleton, OR
    May 18, 2013 12:31 p.m.

    I think it somewhat odd that those who are putting the money on the table are choosing these large, but not enormous, hotel options, while many of those commenting on the project (both in the article and on this comment board) think another way is the way to go. The demand seems to be there for more rooms and these particular investors seems to expect to make some money along the way. Amen

  • MormonSean Salt Lake City, UT
    May 15, 2013 12:09 p.m.

    "Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams said planners for nearly 30 conventions that chose not to come to Utah cited the absence of a central headquarter hotel as the main reason.

    Strike my previous comment. We need a centrally located luxury hotel AND place for conventions! lol The Church is investing in a revitalized downtown with a great mall. Where is everyone else?

    Two more typical hotels isn't what we need. There is already space to stay downtown and business/extended stays are just competing with existing lodging space. What we need is space that will foster more growth. Hotels that attract people aren't just good for the city's growth, but it will be good for the hospitality industry as well. We need more attraction to the center of the city, not more 'typical space'. Typical doesn't sell. Investing can be risky, but without taking risks you never get the pay off.

    Simply put:

    If Marriott or Hyatt won't contribute something better to our city, maybe it's time we found someone else who will.

  • MormonSean Salt Lake City, UT
    May 15, 2013 9:08 a.m.

    Personally, I want a J.W. Marriott or a Ritz Carlton close to temple square or City Creek Mall.

    I'm not a luxury snob, I just love to see the city develop. it's just that the Grand America seems to be the only major upper-end hotel downtown and it's outside of everything. I just want something similar that's centrally located that will help build growth. Another courtyard and Hyatt House isn't much more growth than anywhere else.

    There are plenty of hotels that are centrally located already, we should just convert one of them into something better.

  • Makid Kearns, UT
    May 15, 2013 8:45 a.m.

    Please remember that there is a different level of economic scale occurring. A $20 Million investment for 2 small under 150 room hotels is not the same as a #300 Million 1000+ room hotel with exhibit and meeting space.

    There are lots of smaller hotels being built everywhere around the country but there hasn't been 1 convention hotel with 1000+ rooms built in the United States in more than 15 years that was at least partially subsidized.

    Only a 1000+ room convention hotel will guarantee that Outdoor Retailer stays in Salt Lake along with the $40 Million per year impact. The subsidy for the hotel is less than 3 years of Outdoor Retailer. Are we willing to risk losing OR and having taxes go up because we won't give a tax deferment to a developer?

  • DN Subscriber 2 SLC, UT
    May 14, 2013 9:30 p.m.

    Wait a minute, weren't we told just a few months ago that it was impossible for the private sector to build "needed" hotels downtown and that taxpayers would have to fork over a big pile of money if we wanted more hotels?

    Guess some developers make money getting it from taxpayers, and others make it by renting hotel rooms where customers want them.

    Remember this next time some politician or their pet developer tells you that taxpayers need to spend money to compete with private enterprise.

  • toosmartforyou Farmington, UT
    May 14, 2013 7:06 p.m.

    I've had the privilege of staying in one of these mega-hotels (proposed by Rep Wilson) in Baltimore and the spin-off was that I was charged exhorbitant rates. When I indicated I wanted to find another hotel just a few blocks away I was told I would need to pay a $150 exit fee. Also, they wanted $1.00 a sheet for paper in the business center, even though I only needed two sheets to write a letter to a family member. I told them what they could do with it (and it wasn't to add the cost of it to my folio, that's for sure). Internet service was only $14 a night....what a bargain!