Topic of the day: Internet sales tax

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • Opinionated Sandy, UT
    May 8, 2013 1:07 p.m.

    I have dutifully paid use tax in Utah for all out of state purchases because it is the law. If they aren't going to tax e-commerce transactions, then they need to do away with the use tax, because it penalizes me for paying it while others that overlook reporting purchases get the benefit of tax-free sales. The bill would merely provide the purchaser with the ease of paying sales tax without having to keep track of their purchases during the year. Which, BTW, it is not hard to track the purchase. Every time you do e-commerce, print or save the emailed invoice in your tax file. It's easy.

  • Mike Richards South Jordan, Utah
    May 8, 2013 9:43 a.m.

    If sales tax is allowed on Internet sales, all proceeds should be retained by the city in which the sale took place, i.e., no requirement to forward any money to any State.

    Sales tax is a tax for the cost of providing government services to a business, i.e. fire and police services. Those costs are local to the business. Passing tax revenues to other States is taxation without representation. That business cannot vote on the tax rates charged by other locals. That business requires no government services from other locals. That business is not creating a "burden" on other locals.

    Taxing Internet sales is simply a money grab. Even Utah, which requires that we pay a "use tax" for all out of State purchases, should be sued to prove that it has authority to tax us for services rendered in another State.

  • Truthseeker SLO, CA
    May 8, 2013 9:23 a.m.

    This tax creates a nightmare for small businesses. Amazon can afford to have a large tax dept, or expensive tax software, to file returns in various different states. Some states have varying sales tax rates by municipality. This will be difficult for the small business owner to manage. The exemption for small businesses needs to be set higher than $1M in sales.

  • DougS Oakley, UT
    May 8, 2013 6:25 a.m.

    "Duty" (taxes) on interstate sales is un-constitutional. This makes any discussion on this subject moot at best.

  • Ultra Bob Cottonwood Heights, UT
    May 7, 2013 6:31 p.m.

    The businessmen who support sales tax to support our government do not care for the harm done to ordinary people. Any tax that is applied to the purchase of goods or services, according to the purchase price is a bad tax.

    Merchants set their retail prices by many different factors and seldom match others prices. So different consumers are taxed at a different rate for the same article. It is likely that dumb people pay a much larger sales tax bill than smart people which is not good for our society. It’s like kicking a guy when he’s down.

    It is not likely that adding cost (tax) to internet sales will change the market to any great extent. The internet product will still cost less that the purchase at a local store, who has a protected market.

    I don’t drive anymore and when I want something, if I can get it mailed to me I will buy on the internet. However I don’t buy much anymore.