@Kralon"The NIT was a big deal and better most years until 1971.
In 1970 several NCAA schools (such as Marquette) chose to play in the NIT rather
than the NCAA tournament because they thought it gave them better
exposure."This isn't a true statement. Yes, #9
Marquette's coach Al McGuire did choose the NIT over the NCAA Tournament in
1970 but only because he was upset with his seeding. He wanted to play closer
to home. Marquette was an independent team so they could reject the bid (the
top 10 NCAA conference champions were required to accept NCAA Tournament bids
beginning in the early 1950s).In 1971 the NCAA began requiring the
teams to accept NCAA Tournament bids if invited because of the Marquette
incident.The NCAA Tournament was absolutely bigger than the NIT
beginning in the early 1950s. Johnny Wooden and the UCLA Bruins dominated
during the 1960s - early 1970s. Lew Alcinder's UCLA teams choosing the NIT
over the NCAA Tournament? No way!The NCAA Tournament invited less
than half of the teams they invite today and the NIT invited 14 teams so both
tournaments had stronger teams from top to bottom.Good luck to BYU!
@cougarinboston"It's a fact that in 1951, most considered
the NIT the true National Championship. In 1966, there were still a few ranked
teams (such as #19 BYU) that played in the NIT, but the NCAA had surpassed the
NIT in strength and popularity."It was not a fact that in 1951
most considered the NIT the true National Championship. The highest ranked team
that played in the NIT in 1951 was North Carolina State at #8. BYU was ranked
#11.In the final AP poll before the tournaments, Kentucky was #1.
Kentucky beat #4 Kansas State for the NCAA National Championship. FYI, Kansas
State beat BYU in the second round of the NCAA Tournament in 1951 (BYU played in
both tournaments). Kentucky was regarded as the National Champions in 1951."The NCAA didn't start to compel a team to take the NCAA
invitation until 1970, contrary to what a poster above said."Not
true. The NCAA began requiring the conference champions to compete in the NCAA
Tournament during the early 1950s.Also, BYU was the only ranked team
invited to the 1966 NIT.Good luck BYU!
The NIT was a big deal and better most years until 1971. In 1970 several NCAA
schools (such as Marquette) chose to play in the NIT rather than the NCAA
tournament because they thought it gave them better exposure. This made the NCAA
mad because some of the teams in the NIT were considered 'final four'
teams so the NCAA passed a rule requiring NCAA members to attend the NCAA
tournament which rule took effect with the 1971 tournament. Thus from 1971 on
the NIT tournament became the 'leftovers' tournament.
It's a fact that in 1951, most considered the NIT the true National
Championship. In 1966, there were still a few ranked teams (such as #19 BYU)
that played in the NIT, but the NCAA had surpassed the NIT in strength and
popularity. The NCAA didn't start to compel a team to take the
NCAA invitation until 1970, contrary to what a poster above said. What really started to turn the tide in favor of the NCAA tournament, was when
the NCAA granted itself, the NCAA, exclusive rights to broadcast any postseason
games on TV in 1953. That left the NIT out in the cold, and things started to
change from there. It wasn't until the 1955 that the NCAA tournament
started to schedule itself at the same time as the NIT. Before that, it waited
for a week until the NIT was over. Also, the NIT vs. NCAA thing was
somewhat of a racial issue. The "black" teams wouldn't play in the
NCAA until the mid 50's, because of the rough treatment they received at
Southern schools that largely avoided the NIT with it's Northeast schools
and their Black players.
Bleed Crimson"Blah Blah Blah! Here we go again!"An accurate description of Utah basketball for the last eight years.The NIT was on par with the NCAA in 1951, and, only slightly behind in 1966.
The 1966 NCAA tournament only included 22 teams, so there were a lot of very
good teams in the 1966 NIT.Even today, making it to the final four
of any 32-team tournament, pre- or post-season, is a significant accomplishment.
In 1966 the NIT was the tournament for the second place teams in the league. It
was bigger than today, but was NOT bigger than the NCAA. In 1966, Utah won the
league and went to the NCAA and second place BYU went to the NIT. It's
great to see BYU's success in the NIT this year, but please don't
"The Cougars captured the NIT championship at Madison Square Garden in 1951
and 1966, back when the NIT was a bigger deal than the NCAA tournament."I don't think that's true. In 1950 the NCAA ruled that teams
could only play in one post-season tournament. Since that time the NCAA has
been a bigger deal since they had the first pick of teams, even though the NIT
was still highly regarded.
Jeff Call wrote: "The Cougars captured the NIT championship at Madison
Square Garden in 1951 and 1966, back when the NIT was a bigger deal than the
NCAA tournament."Jeff, please go watch the movie "Glory
Road" and get back to us if you still believe the NIT was a "bigger
deal" than the NCAA Tournament in 1966.The 1966 NCAA
Tournament's Final Four was: Kentucky, Duke, Utah and Texas Western (UTEP).
Don Haskins started an all black team against Adolf Rupp's all white team.
Haskins and Texas Western won the championship that year which was the only year
from 1964 - 1973 that Johnny Wooden's UCLA Bruins did not win the NCAA
Championship. Incidentally, Jerry Chambers of Utah was voted the most
outstanding player of the Final Four.The NCAA selected their
tournament teams first, then the NIT filled out their brackets.Good
luck to BYU, it would be great to see them win the NIT! Also, good luck to the
Lady Utes in the final four of the WNIT.
"Cougars have impressive history with NIT"Blah Blah Blah!
Here we go again!
In NIT was as big or bigger than the NCAA in 1951. In 1966? No way. Yet it
was still a big deal. I remember the Utes' run to the NIT Finals in 1974,
led by Mike Sojourner, Ticky Burden, and featuring Jeff Judkins. The state was
energized, and any Ute fan who downplays the NIT Tournament wasn't a fan in
1974.In the late 60's and early 70's, the NCAA tournament
was only 23-25 teams, meaning there were PLENTY of talented teams in the NIT.
In fact, during that time period the three best teams in the country were
UCLA's Varsity, bench, and Freshman teams (When Lew Alcindor and Bill
Walton were centers of their respective Freshman teams, the Freshman were better
than the varsity. Swen Nater became an ABA all-star and led the NBA and ABA in
rebounding, but never started a game for UCLA). But I digress. In
the 40's and 50's, when both BYU and Utah won titles, the NIT was as
big a deal as the NCAA. (Two teams won both." The 60's and 70's?
Not so much.
"Madison Square Garden in 1951 and 1966, back when the NIT was a bigger deal
than the NCAA tournament." And I really believe that which I remembered my
dad always watch the NIT which was a big deal at that time.Anyway,
good luck and have fun.