John Swallow's outside consulting would be banned under proposed law

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • heated_up Salt Lake , UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 9:59 p.m.

    You ask an excellent question JWB and that is the reason this type of discernment should not be left up to the politicians. They all knew about this before the election and no one cared. It is very likely that none of them saw it as a problem, which while that may be a problem, it doesn't leave Swallow alone accountable. We can't rely on politicians to make good judgments all of the time unfortunately, making a change in culture the necessity, but Swallow should be given a chance to change with it.

  • JWB Kaysville, UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 8:37 p.m.

    The legislature has had plenty of opportunities over the past several decades to do something about this type of ethics and conflict of interest actions. Many legislators and others elected become lobbyists on departing their elected office. The legislature and governor's offices have not pushed that type of legislation as it is a money maker for those legislators that leave their part time employment for a full-time or even part time lobbyist job. There are loop holes and ways that people can talk around the requirements for filing and disclosing. Some people are good talkers and can get you to by a bridge. Some even use their church or association affiliation to get in with the in crowd.

    I believe John Swallow knows if he is honest in all his dealings with people he works, associates and deals with. I am sure that some of the attorneys and staff members in the AGs office know some of the responses the new AG has made as the Chief Deputy AG.

    If he was required to put down businesses he was involved with, even though a trust, why wouldn't he put down the company's or LLCs name?

  • JWB Kaysville, UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 8:00 p.m.

    Political appointees still had a requirement to disclose items or affairs that may be in conflict with the performance of their job. As a lobbyist and as a candidate for a Congressional office he would have had similar election restrictions to disclose for the public and FEC. It is not the first time this person had been in public office. I know that Mark Shurtleff had some medical issues along his road but Paul Murphy or others in the AGs office would have or should have had some knowledge of what this Chief Deputy was doing on the side. When Shurtleff talked with the Federal investigators in October 2012 prior to the election of Swallow, he should have come forth and pulled his support of Swallow. We have had some great AGs in the past who have been Democrats and were beneficial for our state of Utah. Swallows opponents, Sean Reyes and Mr. Smith would have been a better choice with Shurtleff telling why he was withdrawing his long term support for his Chief Deputy. Why didn't Shurtleff fire Swallow when finding these ethical issues? It got worse when the AG is involved with the Federal investigation that could expand

  • heated_up Salt Lake , UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 7:40 p.m.

    I think it is great to close this loophole and hold appointed officials to the same standards as all other employees of the State. However, according to the State of Utah's Employee Handbook:

    "State employment shall be considered the principle vocation of full time employees. However, an employee may engage in outside employment or dual state employment, providing it does not:
    Interfere with efficient performance of the employee’s state position.
    Conflict with the agency or the state of Utah’s interest.
    Reasonably give rise to criticism or suspicion of conflicting interests or duties.
    Violate the state ethics law or rules.
    An employee shall be required to obtain written approval from the department head to continue or to obtain outside employment in accordance with 67-16-4, UCA if there is potential for conflict with primary employment."

    Had Swallow been held accountable to these standards, this still doesn't mean he did anything wrong. It's actually unfortunate this law wasn't in place before he did this work. Maybe his outside work would have been allowed if it was found to not impact his position negatively and he wouldn't be facing all of this scrutiny.

  • Furry1993 Ogden, UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 6:07 p.m.

    Too bad they can't make it retroactive.

  • one old man Ogden, UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 3:31 p.m.

    Want to bet that this turns out to be just more political posturing for points? Will it die in some committee because it might prevent our legislators from grabbing opportunities to make money?

  • Ross64 South Jordan, UT
    Feb. 21, 2013 3:10 p.m.

    It will be interesting to see Swallow get off the hook on this. Looks like he didn't break any laws. However, I see some changes to the laws being made. Swallow is changing the world for the better in every action he takes, good or bad.

  • Irony Guy Bountiful, Utah
    Feb. 21, 2013 2:54 p.m.

    This bill would close a huge hole, and it should be enacted. No one in the Attorney General's office should be doing any work for hire. The possibilities of conflict of interest are obvious and enormous.