Effects of Hyrum raid that divided families still linger after 6 years

Vigil to emphasize need for immigration reform, advocates say

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • snowman Provo, UT
    Dec. 16, 2012 10:49 p.m.

    raybies: 1. I don't go over the speed limit. 2. Families can be together in their own country

  • snowman Provo, UT
    Dec. 13, 2012 10:49 p.m.

    very concerned:

    Men and women fought for the freedoms that people (citizens of the United States) have today. Those who are commiting crimes just by being here illegally do not have these rights and freedoms.

  • raybies Layton, UT
    Dec. 13, 2012 12:20 p.m.

    jwb: You put forth happiness and pain, then law and justice. One is opposite one is the same.

    How about Justice and Mercy?

    I am simply advocating for an emphasis on Mercy through Law. We can change the laws to accomodate families of dedicated immigrants. All it takes is a little mercy and faith.

    I don't think we should be afraid of our freedom, it is the most precious thing our country has going for it. When people come here, if they're not kept enslaved, they come to know the glories of this through hardwork, rewards and making mutual contributions. They do so through cooperation, and they carry that spirit beyond the borders of our country... as it should be.

    The world is in a constant battle against tyranny, oppression and evil, we are not immune from it, and we should be optimistic that this God given gift is meant for the whole world. It is time we stopped treating illegal immigrants as terrorists, and saw them as friends and neighbors.

    Even if they don't stay, if we treat them with kindness they will remember that kindness and it will make the whole world a better place.

  • JWB Kaysville, UT
    Dec. 13, 2012 9:04 a.m.

    On selective groups of people.

    Do you want pilots that can't see or their hearts on the edge of having a heart attack while you are several hundred others are in the back? Do you want them to crash into your house at an unexpected time?

    Firemen and policemen have requirements due to security and physical condition, also. Some of those conditions, similar to military, have been changed to allow a lower condition of employment and society has pushed for some of those changes, which can be good. However, there are some things that may be sacrificed with those changes such as physical requirements of lifting a person out of a burning house and a policeman that has to deal with a larger person. There is a balance to making changes.

    Foreign nationals can go into the military with some exceptions. That is a devotion to duty with no promise of citizenship. However, there is a large chance for those people to be in combat and pay the price for their ultimate service.

    We are a country of promises to the people that want to come and be citizens. Our nation is made of foreigners of all backgrounds/diversity.

  • JWB Kaysville, UT
    Dec. 13, 2012 8:43 a.m.

    This is a land of Liberty for the world. However, Liberty comes with a price, and those that come here cannot get here without paying the price, law and justice, war and peace, happiness and pain, just as the Pilgrims and millions of others have paid. We have a country that, even though not perfect by far, due to pride and prejudice, we are far better with our Founding Fathers listening to the promptings when they made the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States and the system to maintain law and order by our system of government. Those Founding Fathers paid the price themselves through blood sweat and tears for generations to come. Those initial Fathers of our Country had to go to war with England to solidify those documents and principles and attempted invasions and conflicts in 1812, the Alamo, the Spanish-American war to include the Philippines and Cuba, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf wars I and II and resulting conflicts after 9/11.

    We will still have to fight for our freedoms, foreign and domestic, with people and for principles that our nation was founded on for justice for all.

  • raybies Layton, UT
    Dec. 13, 2012 6:41 a.m.

    So what? Everytime you go over the speed limit, you're as evil. Families should not be broken up over this. We have no business to legally destroy it with deportation. We should do all we can to keep them together.


    I'm all for law-abiding, but laws can and should be changed to accomodate the most uplifting and wholesome aspects of society. What's more wholesome than hardworking individuals caring for one's wife, children and family?! We complain endlessly about the breakdown of families, about how marriage is being destroyed through redefinition and divorce, and here we have families that are being dissembled because someone living in abject poverty, watching his family starve to death, has the courage and initiative to do something about it!

    I say, let them stay. Let them pay a fine of some sort if you must punish them, and then give them a legitimate pathway to citizenship. Deport the drug lords, the violent elements, and the coyotes... but keep families together and here in our country. God has made this land of liberty, who are we to get in the way of that?

  • snowman Provo, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 10:42 p.m.

    Raybies: Those fully functional families as you put it are committing a crime just by being here illegally. They take our resources for free which leaves out help for U.S. citizens. I say that if parents are deported they take their children with them.

  • watchman Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 7:02 p.m.

    "What a sad, shameful commentary on the consequences of anti-immigration policies. Thank you D-News for keeping this story alive. We need to remember."

    Yes, TMR in L.A.. We do need to remember and folks that put their families in bad positions should also be reminded that they and their families are responsible for their actions.

    Anyone from L.A. should be able to see what sanctuary cities bring to their citizens.

  • SLars Provo, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 6:06 p.m.

    We were promised that the 1986 amnesty would be the only one. That laws put in place would stop it.

    We were told that the 1996 NAFTA would end illegal immigration. That Mexico would control their side of the border. In the 1996 "reform" we were promised the laws would stop it.

    Fact is, comprehensive immigration reform has done nothing in the past, and will not stop it in the future. It's time our Government kept it's promise to the American people and enforce the laws.

  • JWB Kaysville, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 5:35 p.m.

    People, including parents of unsuspecting children, should adhere to the laws and regulations of the country they are in. If you don't have a visa or permission to enter the country, it is against the law to be in that country, legally and morally. There are multiple ways and methods to get into the country, legally and with permission. The children that are born here, may have citizen status, but that is not a guarantee for the couple that had the child. People take a chance when they cross the border and were probably not at a legal and authorized crossing when they entered.

    It is not the problem of enforcement officers when applying the law. The people who crossed the border knew they had a potential for being detained either at the border, the frontera or desert that they were crossing in order to get to their location for a pickup by someone.

    You take a chance and unfortunately your children also take a chance when it comes to being detained. It appears that most get educational and medical attention as agreed to but federal enforcers could also apply their detaining to others, also.

  • trueamerican Huntsville, AL
    Dec. 12, 2012 4:45 p.m.

    Sad but lawbreakers bring it on their own selves. The feds ought to be busting the CEOs first, though. Fine them big the first time. Jail the next. It won't take long to stop illegals. If you do not want to be separated from your family, don't come here illegally.

  • anti-liar Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 4:19 p.m.

    The phrase "broken immigration system" is nothing more nor less than euphemistic code for "there should be open borders, and those who have scoffed at and disobeyed U.S. immigration law should be rewarded." If this group sincerely believed that what they are advocating for is morally right and fair and good for the country, they wouldn't be obfuscating their true agenda behind the euphemism, "broken immigration system." The truth of course is that there is nothing "broken" about the immigration system. Immigration law simply needs to be enforced for a change.

    "All politicians... recognize the demographics are changing in this country."

    Bryan Gutierrez is right about that. The country is being increasingly overrun by families who disdain this nation, its sovereignty, and its laws.

    "HB497... could result in racial profiling," he said.

    A specious argument. Racial profiling potentially could occur with the enforcement of ANY law.

    "It is basically attrition by enforcement."

    Correct, Mr. Gutierrez. And illegal aliens should be grateful that Utah allows them the remarkably lenient opportunity to put their affairs in order, avoid jail time and fines, and return in peace to their home countries.

    Parents who come here illegally break up their own families.

  • RichardB Murray, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 3:45 p.m.

    I don't think the Deseret news should be encouraging illegal activity.
    And the only people I hear using the "less than human" argument is the pro-illegal people in an attempt to discredit those who want the laws enforced. .

    "If your neighbor commits an evil upon another of your neighbors, you are under obligations to see that the person who has committed the evil be suitably chastised, as much so as though the wrong had been committed upon you. Now this is hard to believe; but if you wish to correct people, and lead them to life and salvation, what difference is it where the evil is committed, or upon whom? Is it not the duty of a minister of God to correct evil and take it from an individual or from the people, and place them upon saving ground, whenever an opportunity presents itself? It is the duty of every individual. " Brigham Young, vol. 8, pp. 364-368 JOD

  • VIDAR Murray, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 3:31 p.m.

    I think we need to consider that we have invaded other countries. What is our moral justification?
    Because they have terrorist in them? How many countries have terrorist in them? Our own country has Italian, Chinese, Japanese, and Russian mobsters: should we invade these countries because some of their citizens are terrorist?
    Most of those who caused the 9-11 disaster were Saudi Arabians.
    Why did we not invade Saudi Arabia?
    Why do we not invade China?
    There are economic terrorist in China: they steal our technologies and violate our copyright laws. There are people in China trying to hack into our computer systems.
    Why do we not invade Somalia: they openly have pirates that are attacking American boats?
    The atrocities being committed in Africa outweigh anywhere else in the world.
    How can we fault Mexicans coming into our country to work; when we have openly invaded other Middle East counties for no other reason than oil?

  • danaslc Kearns, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 3:21 p.m.

    The would not have families we we didn't pay them to have them. Every anchor child brings welfare money to these illegal alien's.

  • VIDAR Murray, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 2:12 p.m.

    DN Subscriber 2
    SLC, UT
    Laws are arbitrary and change over time.
    Not all laws should be followed (do I have to give examples?)
    Many things that are wrong; are not illegal.
    I and every American citizen suffered a loss of income due to the wall street-bank bailout.
    How many bankers and brokers went to prison?
    Why is the owner of the Crandall mine not in prison for nine counts of negligent homicide?
    When was the last time a company owner was criminally prosecuted for pollution violations that led to deaths and sickness?
    When was the last time a car salesman was prosecuted for communication fraud?
    The argument that I was just following orders/obeying the law; does not always work.

  • Say No to BO Mapleton, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 12:45 p.m.

    ...which explains why states like Utah and Texas are fairing better than Michigan and Illinois.
    Unions have their place but common sense dictates that you cannot pay a worker $75 an hour to turn screws on a glove compartment, not to mention the legacy costs of pensions.
    You are right that the illegal alien problem is primarily a labor problem, but the workers are no more innocent than those who hire them. Worksite raids coupled with owners and managers doing the perp walk with the employees is the way to go.

  • lket Bluffdale, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 12:12 p.m.

    The bad guys are the ones hiring people that are not legal, not the people. They want a sub cultrue of low paid workers to make more profit. The whole country is moving that way with right to work laws that allow unions to lose. And the rich to pay ever lower wages so we can go back 100 years in time and have the robber barons in power. Our income is not going up for the aveage worker and pay roll insurance is being done away with in record numbers. Think people 100 years ago many worked 12 hour days. and children worked with you.

  • Say No to BO Mapleton, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 12:08 p.m.

    The election over, it must be amnesty season once again.
    It may surprise you that the immigration enforcement process has compassion built into it already. The agency is called BIA and they even train lawyers who want to do pro bono work to help illegal aliens present their cases. (Of course, immigration lawyers will represent you...for a fee.)
    And often these illegal aliens will be granted their own personal amnesty based on work or family situation. It happens every day.
    The trouble is that so many have entered illegally (about one third of all foreign-born) that these appeals courts are flooded with work.
    For my part, I would prefer a swift-and-sure deportation component because it would deter others from coming here and gaming the system. But government creates its own problems.
    If our laws mean anything we will need to deport more people.

  • DN Subscriber 2 SLC, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 12:02 p.m.

    The lingering effects of breaking laws last forever.

    The benefits from FOLLOWING the law also last forever.

    Shame on the Deseret News for their continued efforts to portray criminals as sympathetic figures. Instead, you should be following the efforts of the wonderful people who OBEY the laws, come here LEGALLY, work hard, and prosper among us.

    When someone chooses to break laws, they alone are responsible for the bad consequences the harm them. I am sorry these people made bad choices, but they can repent, and do the right thing, if they choose to do so.

  • very concerned Sandy, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 11:31 a.m.

    @The Scientist

    Clever post, but - in my opinion - inaccurate. "I think laws that keep people out of another group are bad laws." is too broad of a staement.

    Here are some examples of groups that rightly exclude some people from membership: policemen and firemen, the military, law practice, doctors, voters (discriminated by both age and citizenship), who can legally come and work here, who can serve in government offices. If we fought for everyting to be "equal", we'd have to force the NFL to hire 50-year-old, small, and weak people as players. We'd have to let the likes of the Taliban (if not citizens and not born in the U.S.) run for president and let children be doctors or judges.

    Selective membership and priveliges are at the heart of organized religion! The constitutionally protected operation of religion would be hugely trampled without it.

  • Mr. Matthews Orem, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 11:19 a.m.

    Food for Thought: While serving a Spanish speaking LDS mission in the United States, I met and taught many people who came to the U.S. illegally. I specifically asked my mission president, who asked area authorities if these people could still qualify for baptism, even though they were technically breaking the law. I was told that it was okay to baptize them. Maybe observing how the Church views these people can help soften some of the harsh opinions that I see whenever a story on immigration comes up.

    Do we need to have a secure and enforced method of monitoring immigration into our country? Absolutely.
    Do we need to look at people who have immigrated here illegally as less-than-human scum? Absolutely not.

  • VIDAR Murray, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 11:02 a.m.

    The anti-immigration attitude of utah conservatives is just wrong.
    When my grandmother came over the beginning of last century she did not have to jump through a bunch of hoops. checked for TB and have a good day.
    I have no problem with someone who wants to come to this country and work.
    People act like they own this land. Anytime we could be swept off and replaced with someone else.
    Mexican immigrants did not cause all the problems in this country. They did not raise the cost of oil, they did not force people to buy bigger houses then they could afford.

  • raybies Layton, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 10:54 a.m.

    For those who hit me with scriptures... saying they deserve what they get, here's one for y'all...

    Mosiah 4:17-19
    17 Perhaps thou shalt say: The man has brought upon himself his misery; therefore I will stay my hand, and will not give unto him of my food, nor impart unto him of my substance that he may not suffer, for his punishments are just—

    18 But I say unto you, O man, whosoever doeth this the same hath great cause to repent; and except he repenteth of that which he hath done he perisheth forever, and hath no interest in the kingdom of God.

    19 For behold, are we not all beggars? Do we not all depend upon the same Being, even God, for all the substance which we have, for both food and raiment, and for gold, and for silver, and for all the riches which we have of every kind?

    What did you do to earn your way into this country? We've a wonderful blessing of freedom here. That gift should be shared. Doing so will make this whole world a better place.

  • Jazz Bass Man Wellsville, Utah
    Dec. 12, 2012 10:34 a.m.

    Suprise surprise, the deseret news is at it again, publishing tear jerker stories about illegals, and the kids of illegals who are suffering for the bad decisions of their parents. Give it up DN. Law breakers need to be punished, just as the rest of us are punished if we break the laws of the land.

    The people of Utah are very compassionate and charitable, but we will not tolerate those who break our immigration laws and spit on our country, no matter what propaganda the media and the corrupt business leaders throw out there.

  • The Scientist Provo, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 10:20 a.m.

    I think laws that keep people out of another group are bad laws. Not only should the borders be open to everyone to come and go as they please, without any standards, qualifications, or laws, but the LDS Temples should be the same - anyone should be able to come and go at will, with no laws, or rules, or standards impairing their freedoms.

    Certainly, the owners of the Deseret News can be consistent and advocate for both positions, right?

    Who is with me?

  • TMR Los Angeles, CA
    Dec. 12, 2012 10:00 a.m.

    What a sad, shameful commentary on the consequences of anti-immigration policies. Thank you D-News for keeping this story alive. We need to remember.

  • Tators Hyrum, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:51 a.m.

    I've lived in Hyrum for decades and have relatives in most of the small surrounding communities. I've not seen nor heard of any long term effects from that raid 6 years ago. I would think the only ones still effected are those who are still here illegally and some of their close family members who all fully understood the risks involved.
    Every single person who sneaks into any country in the world illegally (not just the USA) fully understands they are taking the risk of getting caught, separated from their family and exported. Some of those caught (or their family members) will then seek to find a bleeding heart outlet, such as whoever wrote this story, to try to generate community sympathy. Unfortunately for them, polls still indicate that the majority of citizens in this country are still opposed to illegal immigration and want our existing laws enforced even more stringently, which is why states are passing their own laws.
    Regardless of motives, illegal immigration has a negative effect on our unemployed citizens seeking work. Millions of jobs are directly effected. Heart-sob stories will never change the actual facts.

  • very concerned Sandy, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:50 a.m.

    And as for jobs, it’s not a zero-sum game. If people came legally and with the faith of the country, they would be consumers too, which would lead to more jobs for everyone. Also, they have proven they would take the menial jobs fewer of us will do, until they – through the “American Dream” – would be able to move up. I believe we have the room and capacity to take them in.

    All I’m saying is that I believe we should welcome good people, making it easier for greater numbers to come. The way it is, we have 10’s of millions of criminals (by very definition) and no one will win. If we let more in legally, we will have a larger number of engaged citizens.

  • very concerned Sandy, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:48 a.m.

    However, IF we are NOT going to change the laws (which I believe do need to be changed) then we need to enforce the ones we DO have. Having laws on the books that we ourselves ignore is not a healthy thing for a nation ruled by law.

    But if more could come legally, then we would have larger numbers of loyal citizens who would be obligated to take on the duties of citizenship rather than try to remain in the shadows and not get caught. Some of those duties and contributions would be very beneficial for the country. For example, paying taxes, serving in the military, etc.

  • very concerned Sandy, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:48 a.m.

    Regarding immigration, most of the comments so far have been about illegal aliens bringing their problems on themselves (i.e. deportation) by coming here illegally. I agree with that. Enforcement is inadequate. I agree with that . . . . considering the laws we have currently on the books.

    What I would like to add is that I believe we should be freer with how many we let into this country legally. I have said it before that our country was built on the backs of legal immigrants: Europeans, Asians, Scandinavians, etc. They came, worked hard, became citizens, and contributed. The first generation often did not learn English. But there were laws and procedures in place to assure (as much as was possible) we were letting in honest, hardworking people. We could do it again. Remember, we, or our ancestors, all immigrated here. I believe our country would benefit from more responsible, family-oriented legal immigrants. As it is now, there seems to be too strict of a quota.

  • 4601 Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:44 a.m.

    When one decides to break the law (immigration or otherwise), bad things can happen. Don't blame the law.

  • 1conservative WEST VALLEY CITY, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:20 a.m.

    "Raybies" I'm curious. Do you think we should accept any/all immigrant trespassers from ALL nations, or just the ones who sneak over our southern border?

    There is in the neighborhood of 2 billion folks who would like to be here (especially if we provide free stuff). Do you think we can afford it, or are you ONLY partial to illegal trespassers from the southern hemisphere?

    BTW - you DO understand (I hope) that most of them have stolen identities they are working with. If mom and dad get caught with stolen identities, should we:

    a) feel sorry for them
    b) call the owner of the stolen identities and tell them "tough luck"
    c) forget the whole thing and pretend that families should "stay together"

    BTW - I welcome an answer from anyone!

  • BigD Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:13 a.m.

    What about the poor guy that just wants a bigger TV for his family so he breaks into your house because you have a 65 inch? Have some compassion, he just wants to help his family. Don't break them up by putting him in jail because that isn't right! He was just doing what he thought was best for them.

  • MapleDon Springville, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 9:10 a.m.

    More pathetic "open border" propaganda by the DesNews. The fact is all of us are free to choose our actions. There are, however, consequences for our actions.

    It's just that the DesNews wants to get rid of the consequences for a selected group of people. Why? Maybe they ought to explain that. I'm not easily duped into thinking this is about compassion.

    I'm inclined to believe it has more to do with gain. Several groups and entities are hoping to gain through open borders: (1) the Democratic Party to solidify one-party national rule, (2) businesses that employ cheap illegal immigrant workers (wonder why our unemployment is up?), (3) businesses that cater to that group (including DesNews, which owns El Observador), (4) churches obviously want to be seen as the "good guy" in order to attract memberships.

  • Flashback Kearns, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:52 a.m.

    12th Article of Faith.

  • Cats Somewhere in Time, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:45 a.m.

    These families don't have to be seperated. They are all free to return together to their own country. No one is stopping them from doing so.

    This is a sad situation that, I think, we are all somewhat conflicted about. But, the fact is that none of this would have happened if these people hadn't broken the law by coming to a country where they had no right to be.

    We cannot lose control of our own borders. We have to be vigilant about how many people we let me.

  • cork Murray, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:43 a.m.

    Try crossing any other country's borders illegally and see what happens! Commentators here are exactly right when they say that the only thing broken here is that we don't enforce our own laws. Illegals - don't come to me crying a river when it was your choice to break up your family in the first place, for whatever reason. I've got friends from south of the border who have spent MANY YEARS and MANY DOLLARS doing it all the right way, and they are properly outraged at those who do it illegally. I also have those in my own family who have taken the time and money to comply with the law in order to earn the right to live here. I just wish there were some way to effectively seal our borders from ALL illegals - and that we had the political leaders with the guts to enforce the law.

  • watchman Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:42 a.m.

    It is very evident that most all of the above comments were made by citizens that understand the circumstances behind this and other raids by ICE on employers that have chosen to break the law by hiring illegals. Why is it so difficult for some of our elected leaders to see this and do something to protect the citizens of their constituency?

    It is shameful that enforcement of American laws is blamed for breaking up families when it really is the arrogance of these illegal fathers and mothers who come from other countries without proper permission to take advantage of the benefits and values of American citizenship.

    Speaking of compassion is a misplaced statement.

  • mohokat Ogden, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:27 a.m.

    The first four comments here were right on. Then a bleeding heart pops up. These people know before they violate immigration law exactly what the penalties are. Knowing that they choose to risk those penalties and then cry when they are caught and then want the law changed for them. The words reform and broken immigration system are pure bunk. What is not bunk is enforcement.There is not enough of it. Swift and sure enforcment is what is needed and that is what is broken in the system. Famlies are separated every day for various reasons. Crime,Military deployment, death etc. So cry me a river.

  • Kitenoa Salt Lake City, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 8:21 a.m.

    At your house, day or night, just leave the front door wide open. See what would happen, honestly? Now think of the borders?? Perhaps a little more law and order would be appreciated!

  • raybies Layton, UT
    Dec. 12, 2012 6:30 a.m.

    We can do better as a state and community. The poor kid's story is exactly what should never happen when it comes to deportation. Fully functioning families are not the enemy, and our intent should not be to break them up. We should be looking to remove the criminals that bring negative influences, drugs, violence, and gangs into our communities. Our schools should put more effort into fully integrating these kids and helping them to meld with our values and culture, so that regardless of whether they stay or go, we leave them better off than they were. Utah values families. If we hurt our neighbors we hurt ourselves. If we work together we can create an environment that creates long-lasting social contributors, a rich tapestry of contributors to the overall peace of a community.

    We have a lot of social and economic problems, but breaking up illegal families isn't a solution, nor should it be our goal. A strong family should be supported over any other social construct. It's time we stopped shooting ourselves in the foot.

    Dec. 11, 2012 11:14 p.m.

    Demographics have nothing to do with it. Follow the laws, and you don't have these problems. If we enforce the laws, people will be motivated to follow them.

    We are in control of our own dreams. Demanding others fulfill our dreams is wrong. Half my family came here from Mexico legally over several years. Making your dreams come true takes time. You need to take control of your life and achieve them by doing what's right.

    Swifts is a good example about returning people to work that have a legal right to work, and removing those who don't.

  • prelax Murray, UT
    Dec. 11, 2012 9:13 p.m.

    The breaking up of families comes from breaking immigration laws. Don't break the law, don't be separated from your family. The fact that they can be reunited in their home country shows most choose to be separated. That's their decision, not the law.

    American citizens are separated from family all the time when they break laws, no compassion for them?

    Followup: Swifts could not make it using legal labor, so they sold the company to a Brazilian corporation that had record profits in a couple of years. Illegal immigration is hiding poor business leadership skills by some in our business community.

  • 1conservative WEST VALLEY CITY, UT
    Dec. 11, 2012 8:26 p.m.

    Moral to the story: Illegally trespassing in a country not your own brings bad consequequences. Similarly, families are COMMONLY broken up when a member of the family has to go to jail. Where's the outcry over THAT?

    The problem is easily (and cheaply) solved by mandating e-verify.

    Maybe the DN should add that to their story?

    BTW - I remember the "raid", and the way I remember it INS made EVERY effort possible to carry out their duties with compassion.

    When someone is breaking the law; how much "compassion" should there be?