Attorney for Mormon bishop challenges constitutionality of mugshots

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • OJF64 Sandy, UT
    March 6, 2012 11:18 p.m.

    Innocent until proven guilty.....I hate to admit it but I have to agree.

  • George Bronx, NY
    March 6, 2012 10:49 p.m.

    ""The double-shot picture, with front and profile shots alongside each other, is so familiar from 'wanted' posters in the post office, motion pictures and television, that the inference that the person involved has a criminal record, or has at least been in trouble with police, is natural, perhaps automatic," the appellate court wrote."

    He has been in trouble with the police - that is why he was arrested and why this is a question.

    If it is decided that a mug shot does not need to be taken of him, than no mug shots should be taken of anyone else either.