Hey Thinkin' Man - I'm curious about your train of logic. How does the climate change conspiracy relate to "doling out money to the
developing world?"How does this conspiracy work?How
does curbing CO2 emissions and finding alternate energy sources enrich the
"developing world," at our expense?Have you really thought
(Punctuation edited) SLCDenizen: Denying science? No! Denying nonsensical 1800s
economics made famous by Malthus. That's all this UN stuff amounts to:
Economic and political nonsense made up using extrapolated and manipulated
pretend science data to raise fears of too many people, too little food, and the
need to tax and control everyone to protect the planet. Bunk! Sure climate
changes. In the summer it is hotter than in the winter, and vice verse. If you
come to Oklahoma, you will see the climate change from day to day and hour to
hour. Always has and always will. But now, the wise elites think that they can
create the changes they want with Geo-engineering. Or they want to start
limiting the population with more birth control, abortion, GMO foods that
haven't been sufficiently tested, and harmful untested vaccination
programs. Sigh. When will they ever learn?
An article about climate change? Bring out the cranks! Let them extol the virtue
of denying science but embracing religion!
Hype and nonsense! These dire warnings aren't exactly coming from an
objective, credible source. The IPCC and related U.N. bodies are dominated by
far-left-leaning bureaucrats and ideologues who stand to gain power and money by
imposing global restrictions on developed countries and doling out money to the
developing world. Using scare tactics is the oldest trick in the book.
If the temperatures don't rise, what is the cost - with respect to all of
these issues - in making the assumption that man can actually change the
temperature of the world in any direction? What is the cost today, in believing
that man has the ability to cause the earth's climate to change in any way?
What did man do before when climate changed? What differences will there be,
even without climate change?Why am I supposed to believe that man
has any affect on climate change? While all should believe in being protectors
of our environment, why must we all accept as factual matters which are not
proven - and therefore not true?