Judge limits texts, photos in Trayvon Martin case

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • Interloper Portland, OR
    May 30, 2013 7:17 a.m.

    Remarks about the Trayvon Martin case, reveal, beyond a doubt, that many white Americans still perceive a black person's life as having little or no value. There was no reason for a vigilante to shoot and kill an unarmed boy who was walking home from a convenience store with a drink and candy. In addition, the accused has a record of violence, including assault on a peace officer. Last, but not least, Zimmerman has called law enforcement nearly 50 times in recent years reporting black males as 'suspicious,' one of them a seven-year-old. The desire to exonerate George Zimmerman for a crime he did commit shows the fight for civil rights for everyone is far from over.

  • JBQ Saint Louis, MO
    May 29, 2013 7:20 a.m.

    In this particular instance, the actual "crime scene" is of grave importance to the understanding of the case. The "logistical nightmare" could destroy the impartiality of the evidence. Actually, the crime scene and the subsequent environment are tantamount to the understanding of what happened. They should bus them in and let them walk around to "get a feel" for what happened. This case is extremely important for the moral fabric of the country. Guilty or no, the charge of "premeditated" makes the prosecution look laughable and vindictive from the beginning. Manslaughter would have been an appropirate charge.

  • Tators Hyrum, UT
    May 28, 2013 4:31 p.m.

    "Bored To The Point..." has already tried and convicted him (Zimmerman) before the jury has even been chosen and all in less than 200 words with his comment here. Pretty amazing!

  • Mark B Eureka, CA
    May 28, 2013 3:38 p.m.

    So, should the jury, whatever its makeup, find Zimmerman guilty of anything? Thinking too much of his own fighting skills? Firing a weapon in a populated neighborhood? Thinking that the NRA would back him no matter what he did? And Martin? Guilty of standing in the way of a fired bullet while misjudging the man who had the gun.

  • george of the jungle goshen, UT
    May 28, 2013 2:18 p.m.

    Truth is relativity, only to what you can relate it to. I seen the picture of a 8 year old, and know the age of the dead guy. I heard who's son he could of been. I heard the about the people, and what they done in their life. How can I relate, Hum.

  • Igualmente Mesa, AZ
    May 28, 2013 1:32 p.m.

    It's highly predictable that the verdict in this case will be based on the racial makeup of the jury.

    The defense waived a pre-trial hearing using Florida's stand-your-ground immunity, but may still use it during or even after the criminal trial, since this law does not stipulate usage parameters when concurrent criminal charges are being litigated.

    My opinion is Mr. Zimmerman is not-guilty of 2nd degree. He had a right to concealed-carry, and volunteered with the HOA to observe non-residents in this community. The teenager turned on him and asked 'Whats your expletive problem?...you got one now', and knocked him to the pavement and began to punch him incessantly until Mr. Zimmerman could defend himself.

    A very unfortunate case of self-defense, no matter how racially-charged it has become.

    Floridians are definitely fearful of a not-guilty verdict, as it may touch off race riots never before seen, and cost the lives of others.

  • Bored to the point of THIS! Ogden, UT
    May 28, 2013 11:08 a.m.

    Trayvon Martin's past should be left out of this case. I don't care if he was the biggest thug in town! Zimmerman was told by law enforcement to "back-off" and not pursue the 'suspect'... all that happened after that point, all responsibility, is attached to Zimmerman! The outcome, whether planned or not, is his responsibility.

    If a man were following me like Zimmerman followed Martin, at some point, I'd turn to face that person/man. No dobut Martin realized Zimmerman was following him. He was afraid, and as we now know, for good reason. The man following him had a gun! The man, Zimmerman, did in fact kill him!

    I belive in the right of self-defense. In this case I believe that right fell upon Trayvon Martin... NOT Zimmerman. Zimmerman went after a teenager, bit off more than he could chew, and ended up having to "exercise his 2nd Amendment rights" to finish the job.

    In case you can't tell... I believe Zimmerman should to go jail. While I believe he thought he was doing good, the neighborhood watch responsibility/power went to his head!