George F. Will: Obama takes a page from George Wallace's book

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • Rikitikitavi Cardston, Alberta
    May 25, 2013 10:07 p.m.

    Most of us conservative folks despise just about anything this President does simply due to the fact he insists and persists in governing from the far left. What do you expect we who are right of center to do? Do you expect us to just bow down to this President and accept his refusal to govern in a more moderate fashion. That's all we ask. You who are left of center should be allowed to object if the tables were turned. No President should attempt to govern from far left or from far right. Is that too much to ask? So don't go accusing all conservative folks of standing in the way of a united America until the President moves closer to the center and truly makes sincere attempts to govern for a majority of Americans. Meanwhile I am not holding my breath as this President has his own agenda and lacks the leadership skills to build a united America.

  • procuradorfiscal Tooele, UT
    May 25, 2013 4:23 p.m.

    Re: "Maybe we need to modifying the Constitution so these children can stop bending the rules and laws in cynical ways to their own maximal benefit."

    Yeah, and I'm sure liberals will bleat the same refrain after the 2014 elections, when Republicans control the Senate, right?

    And, that they were in the forefront of demands for changing Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster during the 2003-2007 period when Republicans controlled the Senate?

    Liberals have, not the slightest concern for the people, the Constitution, or the Nation. Their sole concern is advancing liberalism's agenda.

    It is unmitigated hypocrisy to now chant their support for "hope and change" of Senate rules!

  • There You Go Again Saint George, UT
    May 24, 2013 3:51 p.m.

    George Will invoking George Wallace to define Obstructionist Republicans?


  • Craig Clark Boulder, CO
    May 24, 2013 11:55 a.m.

    The Senate can't plead it was circumvented when it was their willful dereliction that put the President in a position of either acquiescing to an intolerable situation or to take Executive action to keep the NLRB functioning.

    Now we hear George Will putting the President's adroit use of power in the same category as George Wallace's obstructionism to preserve segregation. Will once again demonstrates his dexterity as a Pharisee who is glaringly selective in expounding on the letter of the law.

  • pragmatistferlife salt lake city, utah
    May 24, 2013 11:13 a.m.

    bandersen...most important document ever written? I thought you would claim that for the bible or book of Mormon. The President is allowed to make appointments when Congress is not in session. This will go to the SCOTUS and we'll see if they were or weren't.

  • Roland Kayser Cottonwood Heights, UT
    May 24, 2013 10:57 a.m.

    Completely omitted from this piece is the fact that Republicans have been blocking all of President Obama's appointments to the NLRB. As the piece states, without a qurom, the board cannot function. If it can't function, employers are free to violate any and all labor laws, because there is no one to enforce them. That is the Republican goal, the death of labor laws, without actually repealing them, which would be highly unpopular politically.

  • Ultra Bob Cottonwood Heights, UT
    May 24, 2013 10:11 a.m.

    I wish people could come out of the hole of 200 year old history and see the world as it is today.

    The president of the United States is the only significant government official elected by the American people.

    Because of the voting roadblocks, hurdles and hoops placed in the way of the voting public in the states, neither the Senate or the House of Representatives can claim to represent the people. At best, the Senate and house represents only the business interests in their respective states. But as business is no longer associated with just states or even nations, even that representation is suspect.

    For America to survive with even a tiny bit of democracy, the people must gain control of their government. The chances of that happening are looking pretty bad.

  • Ultra Bob Cottonwood Heights, UT
    May 24, 2013 9:50 a.m.

    It is sad that so much of the world is anti-people. It is really sad that the anti-people have most of the money.

  • Mike Richards South Jordan, Utah
    May 24, 2013 9:37 a.m.

    The President does not represent the people. The House represents the people. The Senate represents the States. The President represents the nation, or our federation of States, to the world. He is required to get the consent of the Senate whenever he acts as our representative of the nation to the world. He is forbidden from acting alone without the consent of the Senate for more than a few days at a time (War Powers). It is not the House that MISREPRESENTS the people; it is the President.

    He illegally appointed people to office when the Senate was in session. He now wants those illegally appointed people to dictate to business that a business' right of free speech be inferior to his right to dictate terms and conditions to those businesses.

    If anyone cares to look, the checks and balances guaranteed by the Constitution forbids having a dictator. The oath of office requires that Obama either do his duty according to the Constitution or that Congress remove him from office.

    Since Obama will not do his job, it's time Congress did its job.

  • The Real Maverick Orem, UT
    May 24, 2013 9:33 a.m.



  • 10CC Bountiful, UT
    May 24, 2013 9:29 a.m.

    Skeptical Chymist reveals the underlying problem:

    The Senate has become a tool for obstructionism.

    I disagree with just about everything he stands for, but Sen Rand Paul had the courage and integrity to mount a real Filibuster, the old style, ala Mr. Smith goes to Washington. At this point Senators merely threaten filibuster and grind things to a halt.

    Similarly, the Senate has figured out a way to essentially have no recess, even though all the Senators were at home for the Christmas break. This sounds like union rules that allow workers to get overtime while sleeping.

    Maybe we need to modifying the Constitution so these children can stop bending the rules and laws in cynical ways to their own maximal benefit. What a horrible example to our children.

  • bandersen Saint George, UT
    May 24, 2013 8:42 a.m.

    pragmatistafterlife: You are forgetting one important thing: It doesn't matter who is president; he should be a defender of the Constitution. the Constitution is most important document ever written for freedom. Aside from the fact that it has been butchered, most recently here by Obama, it still stands for something.

  • The Skeptical Chymist SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    May 24, 2013 8:17 a.m.

    The answer to this problem and many others in Washington is for the Senate to reform its filibustering rules. Since Obama's election the Republicans have insisted that to get anything approved in the Senate, there must be 60 votes. The rate of such filibusters has increased rapidly during Obama's administration, to the point that it is now crippling the country. The answer is simple, and Senator Reid should proceed to change the rules of the Senate so that 60 votes are no longer required, at least for the approval of judges, administrators, and other appointees.

  • pragmatistferlife salt lake city, utah
    May 24, 2013 8:08 a.m.

    Gee George nothing about how the Republicans were blocking every single thing the President was trying to do at that time. Remember how McConnell pledged to basically shut the government down in order to defeat the President. Pretty duplicitous to block all political action, scream about how the President needs to lead, and then when he does act unilaterally call what he does in those circumstances unconstitutional. But hey I guess it's the only card the Republicans have now.