Let this be a lesson to any of you Anti-American, we don't need no back
ground checks, gun-nuts who think you can hole up in an underground bunker with
all your guns, and think you can take on the Governement.----------drbarbiedpmGRAHAM, WA"The problem
isn't guns. The problem is people." So,I only have
ONE question and only question only for you drbarbiedpm;Do you, or do you
not support Back-Ground checks?(I think that would solve alot of
"the problem" right there now, wouldn't it?)
We don't need more government, i.e. stricter gun laws -- we just need
people to obey the laws we already have. The problem isn't guns. The
problem is people. And unfortunately, because of agency, people will make poor
choices. There are plenty of examples of bad people hurting others without using
guns, i.e. Timothy McVeigh. So don't blame guns. Blame the people who use
them irresponsibly. Stricter gun laws will not stop people from making bad
choices. Let's put the blame where it belongs. On people not guns.
That's my two cents.
Add me to the list of folks who are grateful the boy was rescued and is doing
The laxity of our gun laws is not a laughing matter.
This gun nut was precisely the sort of person who should have no access to
firearms. I want to find a way, despite all the remaining gun nuts who just
Glad the boy came out of the ordeal ok!
"Laxity of our gun laws ..." LOL!
It has been reported that this man had caused concern among neighbors for a long
time.It would be interesting to find out if any of them ever tried
reporting him to authorities, and if they did, what happened.Because
as it stands now, even if he had been reported, no one could have taken his guns
from him unless he had been convicted of a FELONY.Besides the laxity
of our gun laws, we need to seriously consider stiffening mental health
reporting that will allow a person to have the privilege of owning a gun
removed.And yes, I meant to use the word "privilege."