10 weeks after storm strikes northeast, region gets funds
@mountainman... that is all fine and good... just we need to apply the same
standard on the next national desaster... no help from the feds. It is amazing
that with Katrina... we still had a national debt... but no push back on help.
When Kansas needed help from the tornado.. again, no push back. Only now, we no
longer have the funds to render aid. Perhaps it is coincidence... perhaps
not.@Danny... I will give you the benefit of the doubt...but where
was the Republican plan then. It has been two months. The house did nothing.
They need to move past just voting no on things - and actually provide
solutions. They voted no on Obamacare... voted to repeal it... well, its law
now. I have seen no bills forthcoming to fix the program. Nothing. Again, all
they seem to be able to do is vote no. It the current plan is flawed, provide
an option. So far, no options to be found.
@ UtahBlueDevil. The President has falsely painted a picture of mean spirited
conservatives who don't care about other people. Nothing could be farther
than the truth. The Democrats want to continue to borrow money we don't
have, including this disaster relief while conservatives want spending cuts in
other areas to offset this disaster relief so the DEBT DOES NOT CONTINUE to
explode. Its simple, really, the Democrats are the party of no; no fiscal
I don't think the vote was so much whether or not to give victims of
Hurricane Sandy aid as just how much we could afford to spend. Money
doesn't grow on trees (whatever the Fed would like to think) and this is
the costliest aid bill ever to go to Congress. We're not exactly in hot
shape, fiscally. Our current Congress has no idea what a rainy day fund is.I've really not much idea how the funds are to be used, whether to
help support shelters or compensate individuals or families for losses
(hopefully they would have insurance for that), or whether the funds go to
repairing damaged infrastructure.I didn't read the recent
article, but a headline claimed people were skeptical about the bill because of
some hidden line items not related to Hurricane Sandy. Perhaps I should go
double check on it.
If nothing more is ever said or written about how far partisanship has gone, the
fact that this country used to rally around those who needed aide, and now those
extensions of aide are subject to partisan votes, shows how base and nasty the
war between the two parties has become. The vote, nearly completely on party
lines, had democrats lining up to extend aide, and republicans voting against
it. The voting line was blatant. It was cold, callus and easy to see.Heaven help those residents of Red states should disaster blow across
their lands, or roar across their shores that the congressional mix should be
aligned in a way where federal aide was denied because the wrong political party
was in charge. No longer can you assume that in times of disaster, the nation
will come together - but that the politcal color of the states representation
will determine if aide is extended.