Most of Romney's top fundraisers remain anonymous

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • ute alumni Tengoku, UT
    Feb. 15, 2012 12:46 p.m.

    lds liberal you left off obama on your list
    no fit in SG just what do we know about your boy, obama? school friends, neighborhoods, college records... what we DO know is horrible, wright, ayers, resko ....

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    Feb. 14, 2012 5:24 p.m.

    Let me guess --


    Masters Mahan,

    The key word in "Secret Combination" is SECRET

    The names might change,
    but the game is the same.

  • no fit in SG St.George, Utah
    Feb. 14, 2012 8:15 a.m.

    There are numerous reasons the voters are not embracing Romney. A monumental problem is the secrecy that surrounds both his life and much of his campaign. We know about Koch brothers, and other large contributors. Could others contributing to Romney's campaign be even more controversial?
    Politicians have traveled to the bottom of the food chain and do not seem to be making any headway back up the bucket. Many thought Romney might be different?

  • Doug10 Roosevelt, UT
    Feb. 14, 2012 7:43 a.m.

    In Florida 13 of Romneys 18 millions that he used to win that state came from a non profit. The non profit had only 6 investors.

    It would appear that if you have enough money you can get your man elected.

    Tea Party people have Mitt on the run, according to the poll from Nielsens on Feb 10th Santorum is now even up with Mitt across the country. For the GOP that means 50% are for Mitt and 50% are for Santorum.

    Mitt holds an advantage over Santorum against Obama but his independent voters have swung away from Mitt over the past 30 days as 10% of the independents are now back in Obama's camp. That means if the vote was held today those GOP's not disenfranchised with Mitt would viote for him but 60% of the independents would vote against him or for Obama.

    The longer the Tea Party holds not only the country hostage but the GOP party the less likely the GOP will be in the white house this time next year.

  • Furry1993 Clearfield, UT
    Feb. 13, 2012 3:38 p.m.

    We need to know all his financial backers. We need to know who, apparently, is buying him. We need to know who, apparently, owns him. That way we can determine whether he is someone we want in the White House.

  • RanchHand Huntsville, UT
    Feb. 13, 2012 2:13 p.m.

    Release the names of your "bundlers" Mitt. We want to know who it is pulling your strings in case you manage to make it that far.

    We don't like people hiding behind the curtains, you do recall the Wizard of Oz, right?