Too bad they can't come up with enough money to make her not just look, but
sound intelligent when being interviewed, there apparently isn't enough money to
teach her the statistics, and facts on her own running mate, quite humorous that
the conservatives find it okay that she is spending all this money just to "look
good"... LOL what a joke!!!!! I love it!!!!! From a girl who has never owned one
clothing item from a high end store such as Neiman Marcus, maybe they could send
some of the $150,000 wardrobe my way, I could use a hot short skirt to wear on
national television while I debate a man with far superior knowledge of our
Country's history, our government, wow even more knowledge on HER beloved
"Maverick"... I am going to be laughing the rest of the night about this. Thanks
Mrs. Palin for the laughs, YOU ARE QUITE THE JOKE. And even more thanks to you
middle class republicans who don't even research what/who you are voting for
remember conservatives using class envy about the cost of Edward's hair cuts?
How does Joe The Plumber feel, now that he knows his $100 donation helped pay
for $5,000 worth of hairstayles and makeup?Or...that Todd Palin got
a $5,000 suit.BTW, for you Obama-blamers: Obama owns five,
identical good-quality off-the-rack suits that he paid $1500 for. He's had them
for the entire campaign. Three of Obama's suits cost less than one Todd Palin
suit. Obama also has 3 pairs of shoes....and at least one pair has holes in the
soles. WHO is the elitist? WHO wants to give the tax-breaks to
the higher incomes? Now you know why!Joe the Plumber finally had
to admit, when he actually understood the figures that he would be better off
No, what is remarkable is that we have a candidate that tries to pass herself
off as just a regular hockey mom - fighting corporate and government crime,
fighting for the little guy - while shopping at Neiman Marcus and Saks -- I
can't afford to get in those places, let alone drop six figures - -but the best
part -- the "I plan to donate the clothes to charity" really gets to me. Yeah,
what charity might that be? Your high school pals or the Alaska Independent
Party? She is no more 'like me' than Marie Osmond is. Sheesh.
Obama doesn't need to be negative because the media does it for him. Pew did a
study and found only 14% positive coverage for McCain since the last debate and
60% negative. Obama has 36% positive, 35 mixed and 29 negative (probably from
FOX). If you really want to see Bias, just look at how Bidens stupid statement
got swept under the rug from most media outlets. If Palin made that statement
it would be in full rotation on the networks and written about in every
newspaper. I find the media disgusting, pathetic, irresponsible and
unethical. Joe the plumber got more scrutiny by the media then Obama has gotten
this whole year and all he did was ask a question. The media would rather
crucify him then question Obama about his "Spread the Wealth" answer. Go back
to the Democratic primaries and see how the reporting was done then too. Puff
pieces, defending him from attacks and going after people who question him. I
think we are getting a sneak peek at state run media.
As George Bush would say, Palin is sending 'mexed missages.' On the one hand,
she's a down-home regular person like the rest of us, and feels our pain in
these trying economic times. But on the other hand, she needs to spend the
equivalent of a starter home on some clothes to campaign in. I don't feel I can
bond with her on that level.
Please expand your tv viewing beyond Fox News. All of these issues have been
beat to death by the press. Republicans continally focus on negative
Let's not mention the suit of Obama at an appearance which cost a pretty penny
and was personally fit to him. We won't mention William Aires, Rev Wright,
Father Flagger, or any of the other questionable friends and aquaintances and
connections for Obama. The press won't mention Pharakhan, or Obama's economic
ties with Fanny & Freddie and the millions they made there while leading those
organizations, or the campaign contributions to Obama by these organizations or
the fact that Momar Kadaphi Endorses Obama for President! No, no, no..... that
stuff isn't "NewsWorthy"??? I guess the lingo has changed cause the fact is,
"You betcha, it is!" it just isn't "Media Worthy"!
So, what is the point of this article? Doesn't anyone recall how much Hillary
used to spend, to fly a hairdresser in to D.C., from Hollywood, on a personal
jet? And is anyone so niave as to believe that Obama doesn't spend a small
fortune on those well fitting, custom tailored suits that he likes so much?Come on! Doesn't everyone smell the onesided news reporting here?
If there was ever an appropriate time to use the old saying, "you can put
lipstick on a pig, and it's still a pig", this would be it.
Well if thats what the GOP wants to pay for, thats all they're gonna get, a good
looker and nothing more!