"Among those concerned about the broadness of the proposal is Rep. Kay
McIff, R-Richfield, a former judge. But McIff said he trusts prosecutors
wouldn't abuse the law."Really! Sorry, but abuse of the law is
so widespread that your comment on it seems idiotic.
This law sounds more like criminal aggression to make sure people of interest to
the police are stripped of all their finances. I hope the legislator see through
this charade for what it is, oppressive government prosecution and
persecution.This law will prevent individuals from aggressive repeal
of accusation not yet a crime of conviction. The law of the courts has ruled
that a defendant (the accused) are convicted of a crime and the accused has to
disprove his conviction.A tactical law by police and prosecutors to
keep citizens from proving their innocence. The law doesn't segregate after
conviction or before conviction profiting by people of interest. Existing assets
of accused are up for grabs and confiscation take over by law enforcement.
Assets of accused must be protected from illegal theft.Notoriety?
That is why police have the news media in tow, they create the notoriety to
defund citizens rights. Without the news media persecution and lies, innocent
until proven guilty wouldn't be forced in to the constant badgering by the law.