Truthseeker:"So do you think Obama should have different rules
than his predecessors?"How does America improve if the rules
stay constant? I don't see Bush as the ideal model for leadership nor Obama as
an example integrity.To save our country, we need to raise our
expectations and insist for better.A sixteen trillion dollar debt
exemplifies poor and corrupt leadership, both now and in the past.
Truthseeker | 10:08 p.m. Jan. 26, 2012SLO, CA It doesn't seem to
matter that Pres Bush spent time in his own home, had built a place for the
secret service to stay, had an office built with all the bells and whistles for
the president. Doesn't that make any difference to you? I know the press didn't
like it, my gosh, Hawaii vs Crawford - not much fun. He didn't take all
his friends,he didn't take plane fulls of SUV's, he didn't close beaches, Laura
and Pres Bush flew on the same plane, he didn't hold traffic up for hours, he
didn't have parties in the White House all the time. My heck, he even hosted
world leaders in his "Texas White House." Pres Bush even gave up
playing golf because he said it did not look good while the war was going on.I'd like to see the bill for both vacations.
@A1994So what policies do you hear from Republicans to decrease
unemployment, decrease the debt, decrease gas prices and boost housing prices?
It is true that the GOP seems to be tearing itself apart right now. However,
let's remember the record of Barack Obama:National Debt has gone
from $10 Trillion to $15 Trillion.Unemployment has gone from 7.5% to
8.5%.Gas prices have doubled.Housing values have fallen by 50%.The country cannot afford Barack Obama's philosophy for another four
years. I'm not thrilled about any of the GOP candidates (Mitt seams to have the
best qualifications for what we need at the moment) but we HAVE to try something
WorfObama's charitable contributions percentage equaled Romney's for
2010.So far, (not counting Christmas) President Obama has taken 61
vacation days after 31 months in office. At this point in their presidencies,
George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch in Crawford, TX. And Ronald
Reagan had taken 112 vacation days at his ranch in Santa Barbara, (along with
trips to Palm Springs).The Obamas pay out of pocket for their
housing while on vacation. Taxpayers pick up the tab for transportation,
housing for staff and security as has been done for other Pres. I,
too, remember complaining about all the time Bush spent going around the country
campaigning, so what else is new?So do you think Obama should have
different rules than his predecessors?
Truthseeker,Like Pagan, what Bush or Reagan did, excuses
everything.Those working vacations to Camp David or their ranches,
were not as costly.Did Obama pay twenty five percent on the millions
he took from us for lavish vacations? Did he spend millions without paying
income tax on it? Does he pay thirty percent which he finds as common sense? Is
the IRS after Mitt for breaking any laws?Obama spends more than
Mitt, yet donated much less to charities. He's been using tax money for
campaigning. Money he didn't pay taxes on. Let's really seek the truth.
Uh Worf.Obama paid a higher rate of tax in 2010 (25%) than Romney did
(13.9%). Most of Obama's income came from book sales.You must've
really been irked by Reagan and Bush who hold the record for the most vacation
Gr8Dane,Newt or Barry? Scary isn't it?One
Obama vacation cost much more than the yearly wage of Mitt. Mitt needs to pay
more taxes, while the commander pays nothing on the money he takes from us.Go figure.
Re;Riverton CougarContext is everything."This is an
example where good people can disagree," the Illinois senator said.
"The question then is, are there areas that we can agree to that everybody
can get behind? We can all agree that we want to reduce teen pregnancies. We can
all agree that we want to make sure that adoption is a viable option." The exchange appeared to be prompted by Obama's earlier comments that he
does not favor abstinence-only education, but rather comprehensive sexual
education that includes information on abstinence and birth control. "Look, I got two daughters 9 years old and 6 years old," he said.
"I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a
mistake, (ie if they have sex) I don't want them punished with a baby. I don't
want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn't make sense to not give
them information."In other words, he wants his daughters to be
informed so they wont have unplanned pregnancies or STDs. He wasn't saying he
wants them to have an abortion.
While not registered as a Republican, I am simply amazed that so many of the far
right wing of the Republican party buy in to Newt's chatter. Here is an
individual who was forced to step down due to his ethics in the House. We also
know much about his personal life and numerous marriages. While everyone
deserves a second chance with personal matters, this is a guy you don't want to
walk down a dark alley with alone. In addition to an individuals platform, I
also look at their character and ethics. If it came right down to it, I would
rather vote for someone who you know is ethical and has a consistent character
in their dealings with others, even though I may not agree on all points of
their platform. If this is what the right wing of the Republican Party offers, I
am afraid that Pres. Obama will enjoy a second term.
Riverton,Your judging this man hardcore. Back off faithful
"We already have someone who has family values. . . . He has two wonderful
daughters."Neither of which he wants "punished with a
baby", apparently. Some family values that is.
Kami | 1:58 p.m. Jan. 26, 2012 Bountiful, Utah"I am
shocked that so many members of the church have been making excuses for Romneys
lies, simply because he is also LDS."This shocks you?While Romney and Newt go back and forth about how untrustworthy BOTH of them
all, Ron Paul's going to steal the cake. At least we can all hope.
So Newt (unhinged) says Romney is "desperate, liar, hypocrite.." Wow.
So how would we like a President who resorts to name calling and personal
attacks when he gets annoyed?To paraphrase/adapt Shakespeare,
"Me thinks the gentleman doth protest too much!"Newt has
only confirmed what many have known; he's erratic and unstable. Oh, and should
we really trust a man who has committed Adultery three times (that we know of?)
Isn't the very definition of Adultery... a Liar and someone not worthy of trust
and living up to a commitment previously made?
'And family values.' - On the other hand | 4:35 p.m. Jan. 26, 2012
We already have someone who has family values. Married, to ONE
woman. He has two wonderful daughters. And, he's already
in the White House.
Newt knows all about lies. And family values.
"I have seen the enemy..."
RE: ouisc-- "The Republicans are on the verge of another presidential
self-destruction..." I sure hope you're wrong, but I certainly see things
progressing that way as well.
The Republicans are on the verge of another presidential self-destruction...
I hope the ads fulfill the intended consequences. Mitt REALLY needs Florida.
Should Newt capture Florida as well, I'm wondering if his momentum will be able
to stop. However, as much as these ads are necessary and effective, Mitt needs
to be equally forceful in his debates, face-to-face w/ his rivals. I believe
that's what hurt him most in the SC debates. Newt ran all over him. For all you
Mitt non-believers, there's a reason why the Obama campaign is already attacking
Romney. They wouldn't like any more than to have to go toe-to-toe w/ Gingrich
rather than Mitt.
The all telling sign of a fraud and one who is scared, is someone who attacks
others in an attempt to hide their own imperfections. Newt is a fraud and is
making up lies.
"2) WHO, brought us down?Wall Street Bail out:**'Bush signs $700 billion bailout bill' - AP - Published by Denver Post - By
Tom Raum - 10/03/08"Yet Pagan opposes Romney for opposing this
bailout, so Pagan is really FOR the bailout. Either that or he secretly agrees
with Romney (it turns out Romney was right on the issue).And WHO
brought this on us? It's funny that Pagan cites THIS bailout as the cause for
our economic woes when Obama signed an EVEN LARGER bill shortly after. Not to
mention all the spending he did on top of that! If a guy falls off the cliff,
which was more responsible for the fall: the steps taking him near to the edge
of the cliff, or the last steps over the edge of the cliff? Your logic suggests
Obama deserves everything that Republicans are dishing out right now. I am
shocked that so many members of his party have been making excuses for Obama's
lies, simply because he is also a Democrat. Just makes me sick.
@Star BrightYeah, Gingrich is progressive, like how he did that TV ad
about climate change... nevermind that Romney entered his state into a cap and
trade program. Or how about how Gingrich supported insurance mandates...
nevermind that Romney instituted one and defends it while Gingrich says he was
wrong. Yeah... Gingrich is clearly a progressive.I'm a progressive
and I agree with very little Gingrich is advocating (I do think he has a good
immigration policy plan, of course that's one of the few issues I'm not
progressive on since I oppose amnesty and Gingrich's plan does not give
citizenship to illegal immigrants) so the idea that Gingrich is a progressive is
just absurd. It is literally so out of touch with reality that you clearly are
just a Glenn Beck listener (since he says that Gingrich = progressive thing all
the time) who hasn't bothered to set about and determine what progressives
actually advocate. I'll give you a hint... progressives are disappointed that
Obama hasn't been left enough in his governing.
I don't trust Gingrich. He plays to the audience he speaks to .... as an art.
Gingrich is turning into an angry, frumpy old man. Romney looks presidential.
Well, if anyone knows about "lies and hypocrisy" it's the Newt; he has
spent the majority of his career finely tuning his use of both. This guy is the
most delusional, self-serving blowhard to come down the political pike is
ages...maybe ever. If the Newt is the GOP's candidate Obama will win by one of
the largest margins in history.
'...if the Republicans choose Newt they can bank on 4 more years of Obama, which
would take this country way, way down. If that happens we might as well start
using "Euros" for money.' - toosmartforyou | 2:06 p.m. Jan. 26,
2012 Few things: 1) None of the Republican canidates
have any of the Republican parties confidence. As exampled by: **'Iowa vote doesn't resolve GOP search for identity' - By Charles
Babington - AP - Published by DSNews - 01/04/12 So, to say that 'X'
Republican canidate can 'beat Obama' when, right now it's: Gingrich,
SC. Santorum, Iowa. Romney, New Hampshire.
2) WHO, brought us down?Wall Street Bail out: **'Bush
signs $700 billion bailout bill' - AP - Published by Denver Post - By Tom Raum -
10/03/08 Result? **'Report: Taxpayers still owed $133B
from bailout' - By Marcy Gordon - AP - Published by DSNews - 01/26/12 'After the 2008 financial crisis, Congress authorized $700 billion for the
bailout of financial companies and automakers, called the Troubled Asset Relief
Program, or TARP. About $413 billion was lent. So far, the government has
recovered about $318 billion, or about 77 percent of it.'
Kami; are you also shocked that Mitt accepted no salary while serving as
Governor of MA and no salary serving as chairman of the SLC olympic committee.
This is, I believe, evidence of his character and commitment to public service.
I'm not sure any other candidate, and certainly not Newt the Brute, can evidence
such ultraistic values.
I think whatever Romney comes up with will be multiplied 1000x by the obama
admin. There is such a wealth of information on the internet about Newt and all
the things he has said and done. You think Romney is not conservative enough
well, just read all the things the Newt has said. Progressive anyone?
I can't believe Newt can lecture anyone about "lying" after his
personal life is placed in perspective. He's in denial. Like the candidate
chosen in Nevada to run against Harry Reid, if the Republicans choose Newt they
can bank on 4 more years of Obama, which would take this country way, way down.
If that happens we might as well start using "Euros" for money.Isn't it amazing that voters would choose a known adulterer and rail
against someone who has been faithful to their spouse and then be fearful of a
candidate that actually paid their tithing? My, this country has dropped a long
way. Mitt is the guy who can fix what's wrong, not some Fanny Mae
lobbyist. As previous stated, "It's the economy, stu...."
"There's something about the hypocrisy that should make every American
angry."Pot calling the kettle black...What a piece of work this
Romney deserves everything that Gingrich is dishing out right now. I am shocked
that so many members of the church have been making excuses for Romneys lies,
simply because he is also LDS. Just makes me sick.
'...is guilty of lies, desperation and hypocrisy that should make "every
American angry."'Wow. Newt said THIS? Newt? I think
'chutzpah' is the word that best describes this man. His nerve knows no bounds.