To "Pagan | 12:55 p.m. " again, with blunders like that, why would you
give them more power and control.Actually there are people and
communities who do fine with limited government during a natural disaster. Just
look at Bountiful and Centerville when the trees were all blown over. Few
people waited for the government to take care of things, the people just went
out and started to cut.Look at the response of Texas to Hurricaine
Rita, just after Katrina. Limited government response, and we didn't have
nearly the problems.Show us where a big government response to
something outside of war, has actually worked well.
'Remind me again why we want them to have more control over our lives, and
especially our healthcare?' - Redshirt1701 | 11:48 a.m. Dec. 28, 2011 *'Bush signs $700 billion bailout bill' - AP - Published by Denver Post - By
Tom Raum - 10/03/08 You tell me Redshirt/1702. For a
party that claims to want 'limited goverment'... they were the first
ones that bailed out Wall Street... and the Auto Industry. *'Bush signs $17.4 billion auto industry bailout package' - By Nelson Ireson
- Motor Authority - 12/19/08 And swine flu... *'Rick
Perry (R-Gov./Tx), After Raising Secession, Calls For Fed Help With Swine Flu' -
Huffington Post - 04/27/09 Kinda like: 'There are no
atheist's in a foxhole.' There are no persons who want 'limited
goverment' during a natural disaster.'
What the government gives it can take away.Remind me again why we
want them to have more control over our lives, and especially our healthcare?