Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Who owns the soul of the Utah Republican Party?

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • twoartistic Draper, UT
    April 28, 2011 1:05 a.m.

    Extremist - Someone who thinks the part is greater than the whole.

    Sovereignty, freedom, liberty, as individuals. Brotherhood, family, community as our highest calling. The rule of law, as the safety valve. These are the "whole."

    Unfortunately the "mainstream" RINOs have turned their back on these core principles, and have far too long, traded favors for power. Using tax code and regulation to pander to special interests and corporations. You were granted a thimble full of our sovereignty to keep the peace and order so that we could make the best of our lives. You lusted for more, more, more.
    The shackles of growing oppression, have forced the hand of the common citizen.

    Your hope to return to the days of this slumbering giant, lazily ignoring the seedy back alley you conduct your secret combinations in, are forever dashed. We are watching, keeping notes, passing the news. And just to be clear, it is not extreme to desire freedom, liberty and honesty. What must feel extreme to you good ol' boys, is the swift and enthusiastic desire of many to finally take a stand.

    Wish with all your might, but the ire you created by selling out, is not waining.

  • Cherilyn Eagar Holladay, UT
    April 27, 2011 8:08 a.m.

    To clarify my last comment, they...the "mainstream conservatives" ... are the rehash of the Nixon moderates...they'd like people to think they are, but that is an illusion.

  • Cherilyn Eagar Holladay, UT
    April 27, 2011 8:05 a.m.

    Lavarr, what does it really mean to be a "mainstream conservative?" Please define that term. Anything "mainstream," on a scientific scale, would mean "moderate."

    As you know, Reagan was no moderate and the "moderates" insisted on Reagan naming George Bush as his running mate to balance the ticket. Reagan was called "far right" and "extremist." This battle in the Republican Party is one that has always existed. Everyone wants to be a conservative, apparently. So moderate and liberal Republicans have simply given themselves a new "me too" label.

    This battle is to keep the Reagan Revolution alive in the Republican Party. I am proudly a Reagan, common sense conservative. They are the Nixon "conservatives," and even though I went to school with his two lovely daughters (now very liberal), that would be an oxymoron.

  • Big Wave Dave Draper, UT
    April 26, 2011 3:48 p.m.

    Democracy is the rule of the people who care. We are not governed by the whim of the masses but by the opinions of those that give a darn. Caucuses are a perfect example of this. If you consistently don't attend your caucus, one night every two years, than you have proven you don't care that much. If you do attend your caucus, you can have an enormous influence, including unseating powerful and wealthy incumbent senators.

  • Uncle Charles Where freedom and liberty reign, utah
    April 25, 2011 9:36 p.m.

    @Pagan: I'm not sure what you think your headlines are supposed to prove but I can tell you it does nothing to persuade me that you are correct in anything.

    I can put forward just as many headlines as you do where Democrats have put their foot in their mouth. Ever hear Joe Biden talk about anything or is that just "ol' Joe being Joe"?

    You have shallow arguments pal.


    The last convention and election show that NO ONE owns the Republican Party except the people who show up and get involved and are elected as delegates.

    It takes time to go meet all the candidates and get past the soundbites but if you are a good delegate you do it. You find out what they really believe and what they will do.

    It's the self-proclaimed moderates who have held power for too long in the Republican Party. Often times it is difficult to tell the difference between a D and an R.

    Conservatives said enough is enough and stood up and got people elected who believe like they do. You'll never, ever see a Conservative back away from that label.

  • WestGranger West Valley City, Utah
    April 25, 2011 9:04 p.m.

    Extremist liberals took over a great deal of power within the democrat party a few years ago.The last election was powerful nationwide repudiation of that narrow-minded ideological radicalism. Now, we see a similar movement from the right, a narrow-minded ideological radicalism on a state level. No, not the Tea Party. But elements both within and without the Tea Party.The Tea Party itself is just a grass-roots response to the craziness from the left. Now republican need to keep dialogue open and stop demonizing dissent within the party.

  • Pagan Salt Lake City, UT
    April 25, 2011 1:31 p.m.

    'Who owns the soul of the Utah Republican Party?' - Title


    I'm more worried about the brain.

    *'Gays greatest threat to America, Buttars says' - By Aaron Falk - DSnews - 02/19/09

    *'Buttars used 'black baby' remark again, officials say' - By Rodger L. Hardy - DSNews - 07/05/08
    'At an earlier legislative session Buttars said in referring to a bill, "this baby is black ... it's a dark and ugly thing."

    *'Sen. Orrin Hatch utters profanity about President Obama's health care reform' - By Jamshid Ghazi Askar - DSNews - 03/01/11

    *'Herbert's new education panel missing diversity' - By Amy K. Stewart - Deseret News - 04/19/10


    *Sen. Kyle mocked for making up numbers in abortion debate By Sarah Iraelsen-Hartley DSNews 04/12/11

    *'Sharron Angle's Advice For Rape Victims Considering Abortion: Turn Lemons Into Lemonade' - Sam Stein - Huffington Post - 07/08/10

    *'Brewer Finally Backpedals: I Was Wrong About Headless Bodies' - By Ben Frumin - Talking Points Memo

  • Fight On Draper, UT
    April 25, 2011 1:06 p.m.

    LaVarr - you and your friends, Doug Wright, Kirk Jowers, Bob Bennett, Mike Leavitt, etc. fear the caucuses because you cannot control them. You would prefer that the elites, and lobbyists like yourselves control things instead of your neighbors that take the time to show up at the caucuses. You love every thing that Chaffetz has done in the last 3 years, you just hate that he beat your candidates Cannon and Leavitt at convention, and Cannon again in a primary. You don't like Chaffetz because you, the king makers, did not choose him, not because of what he has done while in office.

    When Bennett lost last year at convention, he spent 10 times more than Lee, Bridgewater and Eagar combined. Some joked that he should have saved some money and just sent every delegate an iPad with a 'VOTE BENNETT' screen saver instead. He did not lose because was not conservative enough. He lost because he forgot what his job was. He is an arrogant elitist that lost touch with his constituency.

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    April 25, 2011 8:31 a.m.

    Let's see...

    Not accepting $100 million for the unemployed to teach them a lesson,
    but paying out $13 million to businesses for doing nothing,
    Passing last minute secret laws to protect their secrets,
    Blaming Public education for nearly all economic shortfalls,
    Helping People bad - helping Business good, mentality....

    Political purism and absolute control equates to regimes like Nazism, Maoism, and the Islamic Taliban.

    The correct answer is:

    Moderation is ALL things....even politics.

  • Doug10 Roosevelt, UT
    April 25, 2011 7:58 a.m.

    Pretty polite article that would have the reader believe everything that is written is true. Several points they make are not really factual, for example

    "Their legislation respects the rule of law, allows compassion and provides Utah business with hard workers"

    this legislation has been deemed illegal by the state and the fed so it does not respect the law. And since when do Utah employers need help finding hard workers when those legals who will work are not hired?

    Another thing they say is that Utah has good governors then lists some of the past but they also include the present who has signed into law several faux paux's, such as access to government info, illegal immigration, and now a highway spending bill that has come under repeal. How many of these is a governor allowed before he gets himself out of the "good govenor" group? Herberts group also cost the taxpayer $12 million on another higway deal gone bad so there was a payoff.

    If the state were run as a business the business would have a new boss by now or be broke.

  • Utah_1 Salt Lake City, UT
    April 25, 2011 1:10 a.m.

    The caucus system is the best way to make sure grass roots movements can work over large amounts of money. It is the only way someone with $100,000 can go against someone with $2,000,000 in election funds.

    Most people that want the caucus system changed, there are exceptions, are frustrated that they don't have as much power as people that show up to the caucus meetings. It doesn't take money, you just have to show up.

    What we need are more people getting involved earlier, not shutting down the system that protects us from the power hungry people wanting to take over.

  • Considering Stockton, UT
    April 25, 2011 12:53 a.m.

    It is the caucus/convention/primary system used by the Utah GOP (and to a lesser extent, the Democrats) that allows newcomers with limited funding to credibly challenge and even defeat well funded, entrenched incumbents. Hence Chaffetz's win over Cannon and Lee over Bennett.

    The caucus system greatly diminishes the power of incumbency, money, and the media in Utah's elections. And so the media dislikes the system.

    And given the DesNew's close relationship with the Cannon family it is nigh unto a violation of professional journalism standards and ethics for the paper to report or opine on the system that allowed Cannon's defeat by a newcomer without disclosing the obvious potential conflict of interest.

  • Considering Stockton, UT
    April 25, 2011 12:48 a.m.

    This article is an example of the acceptable, subtle, incivility that is accepted even as the media cries for "civility".

    Start with the headline about "owning" the GOP. Can we expect the same headline about who "owns" the Democrat party next week? Or will the implications that GOP nominees are bought and paid for be left only with the GOP?

    Next, notice how the GOP is divided into only two camps: moderate/mainstream and "far right." Are there no left leaning republicans? It seems there are not even any "far left" democrats as democrats are grouped into "moderate/centrist" and just plain "democrats."

    From the perspective of our media, it seems there is no such thing as the far left or any radical liberals in this nation. "Socialist" is a dirty word even as we are forced to accept socialized medicine, which has been renamed "single payer" or "national" health care to conveniently hide the truth.

    Here is the answer to the central question.

    Thanks to Utah's caucus/convention/primary system, the GOP is run by those who care enough to show up, rather than by any big money interests.

    Who can object to that?

  • Uncle Charles Where freedom and liberty reign, utah
    April 24, 2011 10:38 p.m.

    Looks like no Dem can detail what they believe, why it's better than the rest and why we should all embrace it.

    All we get is the same old tired diatribes of how bad the "right" is.

    Pretty pathetic when you can't make a case FOR something and always have to put down those who don't believe like you.

    @truthseeker: interesting quotes but they mean what? We should embrace Socialism? Communism? More spending? Government dictating everything we should buy, say, how much money we can keep to take care of our family? Who gets their wealth redistributed against their will and who gets to receive that wealth by doing absolutely nothing?

    All of your Socialist programs are against the Constitution but the Left doesn't care about that document.

    Borders? What are those? Just more voters on the rolls.

    Abortion? just killing a fetus, not a human.

    Military? Who needs one with open borders.

    Environmental concerns? Don't have any now since we have open borders and will bring all the world's population to America.

    America? Gone. Now under the New World Order with Soros in charge!

    I'll pass!

  • Hellooo Salt Lake City, UT
    April 24, 2011 8:30 p.m.

    Love how this article is phrased the "far right conservatives" really as opposed to the far left "main stream conservatives". How about stop the name calling! At least, that speech by the President everyone can agree with.

  • Truthseeker SLO, CA
    April 24, 2011 8:25 p.m.

    "In the present crisis," referring specifically to the high taxes and high levels of federal spending that had marked the Carter administration, "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." He then went on to say: "Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it's not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work."
    Ronald Reagan

    "..The difference between ideological advocacy and holding public office: Having accepted partial responsibility for the nation's well-being, one assumes an obligation that goes beyond bumper-sticker slogans. Certitude is the enemy of wisdom, and in office, it is wisdom, not certitude, that is required...Over the last several years, conservatives have turned themselves inside out: They have come to worship small government and have turned their backs on limited government. They have turned to a politics of exclusion, division and nastiness."
    (Mickey Edwards, co-founder of Heritage Foundation, "Reagan Wouldn't Recognize This GOP")

  • Uncle Charles Where freedom and liberty reign, utah
    April 24, 2011 6:11 p.m.

    @esquire: you have't put forth any facts. You've just shared a post, again, with your hatred and vitriol towards anyone who doesn't believe like you.

    @ETBass: you're no better than esquire. Do you have any details for your name-calling or do you just feel better because you used the word 'nutjob' in a sentence.

    I'm betting that you learned that in PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Right Lifelong Repub?

    Are you so beholdened to the teachers union that you see no room for improvement in our school system? Or is everything just going so well that we shouldn't worry about getting rid of bad teachers, improving the curriculum, voting out salary-heavy lame administrators.

    Not one of you who condemn and trash Republicans, conservatives or tea partiers have put forth anything that is worth considering. You have told us what you are for and why we should vote your way.

    Condemning vouchers etc isn't an argument. What do you stand for? Why do you stand for it? Why should I vote your way?

    What is mainstream and why is it mainstream? Maybe my beliefs are mainstream and you folks are the extreme left!

  • CJ Murray, UT
    April 24, 2011 5:56 p.m.

    Get a clue LaVar, if you think "moderates" are taking over you don't know what is going on. True Republicans are taking the rest of the party back next March, a movement that started in 2010 and the heroes you describe like Hebert are done. HB116 was rammed through in a fashion similar to Obamacare by "Chamber of Commerce" Republicans(hotel owners, dairy farmers, etc.) who believe in a "plantation philosophy" of "we need the slaves to pick the cotton". If you think that is the future of the party and that those guys are going to dominate going forward then you need to find a new line of work. I was a delegate at the county convention and I can tell that the mood there is one of "no amnesty of any kind for any reason" and that it is time for RINOS to go elsewhere. The delegates like myself and others were sent there because we represented the will of the people in the districts who attended the mass meetings and feel the same way we do. HB116 and RINOs backing it are on their way out.

  • Brer Rabbit Spanish Fork, UT
    April 24, 2011 5:18 p.m.

    So, those precinct caucuses and conventions are bad now that the citizens have discovered that they can actually have an effect on Utah politics? This seems to have upset the lobbyists and special interest groups that feel their control slipping away. In 2008 citizens realized when Jason Chaffetz was able to replace Rep Cannon with a fraction of the financing that they no longer had to submit to lobbyists and their financing of incumbents.

    In 2010 they realized that the citizens could remove an incumbent senator, who was representing money and political power, but not the citizens of Utah. The Republican Citizens packed their neighborhood precinct meetings and refused to vote for delegates that appeared to favor the incumbent senator. The lobbyists and special interest are not going to let this happen again if the can help it. Therefore we have this article by LaVarr Web, a paid lobbyist.

    Lobbyists lost a lot of money in their investment at the 2010 convention, when Utah Republican Delegates refused, by wide margin to nominate the incumbent. In addition the convention delegates stayed to the bitter end of the convention in order to place an anti-amnesty plank in the platform.

  • Ernest T. Bass Bountiful, UT
    April 24, 2011 4:49 p.m.

    The nutjobs control the party. There is no room for moderates in the Utah republican party.

  • Richard Saunders Provo, UT
    April 24, 2011 3:21 p.m.

    I would like to ask Mr. Webb who has been governing our nation the last half-century? No, it hasn't been the tea-party. Not the folks from Code Pink. Those in the middle gave us wars in the middle east, the Patriot Act, a 14 trillion dollar debt and other problems that we face. I got involved in politics for the first time last year and I was one of those wackos who helped unseat Bob Bennett. It seems that both Piganelli and Webb believe that as long as you vote the right letter, everything will be fine. I don't consider myself a Tea Party person, but if what they believe is that just being a Republican isn't good enough, than I'm with them one hundred percent.

  • red state pride Cottonwood Heights, UT
    April 24, 2011 2:56 p.m.

    What did Nancy Pelosi say recently? That "moderate Republicans" need to take back their party that elections won't matter. Yes indeed Mrs Pelosi. Maybe that's why "the far right" had so much influence in the last election - we saw that the REpublican mainstream e.g. Bob Bennett were a little too comfortable working with the far left. George Bush and amnesty, John Huntsman and global warming you could go and on
    Why be a Republican if there is no difference between that party and the Democrat party of 30 years ago?
    Say what you like about the "far right" but it plays an important role in keeping the Republican party from drifting too far left like it did under G.W. Bush

  • Roland Kayser Cottonwood Heights, UT
    April 24, 2011 2:52 p.m.

    To Craig: Richard Nixon's domestic policies would put him to the left of most Democrats today. Eiesenhower said that anyone wanting to undo the New Deal was "stupid". Sorry, but I think your analysis is backward.

  • evensteven Sandy, UT
    April 24, 2011 2:48 p.m.

    I find it humorous that Mr. Webb attempts such a back-handed compliment of the Tea Party. "Mainstream" and "Far-Right" are not necessarily mutually exclusive. One is a measure of popularity, the other a location on an ideological spectrum. To presume that a far-right ideology can not be mainstream reveals the tin ear that too many Republicans have given to their constituents, and which gave birth to the TEA Party movement.

    Also, given Mr. Webb's close assiciations with certain past governors (with reputations as being on the liberal-mderate side), I would challenge his assertion of being mainstream or conservative. Republican, yes, but really in name only.

  • Esquire Springville, UT
    April 24, 2011 2:47 p.m.

    The GOP in owned by the radical right, plain and simple. Reagan wouldn't be welcome in today's GOP. That's what's happened, and you all seem so oblivious to that fact.

  • Still Blue after all these years Kaysville, UT
    April 24, 2011 2:26 p.m.

    To all the self proclaimed moderate Republicans: Please explain how the folks you elected the past 30 years have run up $14 trillion in debt and you still support them? Cause those of us that have been trying to get across the message that we are spending far too much still wonder what you're thinking. Moderates support big government. Period.

  • Hank Pym SLC, UT
    April 24, 2011 1:53 p.m.

    re: RanchHand | 8:23 a.m. April 24, 2011

    I don't disagree. However, isn't interesting that the State Capitol, Utah GOP HQ, & the church office bldg are all within a mile of each other on State Street in downtown SLC.

  • Craig Salt Lake City, UT
    April 24, 2011 1:07 p.m.

    I do not consider Mr Webb a mainstream conservative. Those who move to the left try to convince everybody else that they are still in the right. A Democrat thirty years ago would be in the mainstream Republican view today. The right wing has not changed, others have moved left.

  • Lifelong Republican Orem, UT
    April 24, 2011 1:05 p.m.

    I'll tell you and all future candidates what us moderate Republicans are looking for.

    Someone that supports public education. Not charter schools, not vouchers, not demeaning the teachers of our children.

    If that candidate comes along, he or she will win in a landslide.

    Right now the ultra right thinks they have to blast public ed and the teachers. This is where they are losing the battle with the public and if they aren't careful will lose their power.

    Us parents see public ed as a GOOD thing not the evil that is portrayed by the far right.

    It really is that simple.

  • Mike Richards South Jordan, Utah
    April 24, 2011 12:59 p.m.

    Oh my goodness! Is it the Republican Party that has destroyed this country or is it self-serving politicians egged on by a self-serving public whose mantra is "Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!"?

    Posters have singled out elected officials and smeared them with paint from the brush of their own bigotry. It's no wonder that people see the "system" as being corrupt when they, themselves, are corrupt.

    The Republican caucus system is the best thing that has happened to the REPUBLICAN PARTY in Utah politics. No longer can an incumbent spend himself back into office. No longer can he count on sleepy sheep following along as he 'shepherds' them to his fold. Those interested enough to stop whatever they were doing for an evening have the chance to boldly tell candidates that they're fed up with empty promises.

    We're all conservatives on certain issues and liberals on others. Even the most liberal, judging from what they post, are very conservative when it comes to allowing some non-liberal to speak in their opposition. Even the most conservative has a liberal attitude about 'defense' spending.

    Bickering is not unique to either party.

  • Uncle Charles Where freedom and liberty reign, utah
    April 24, 2011 12:44 p.m.

    No one on these pages, including the 2 authors of the post, have put anything forward to detail what is or isn't mainstream and why what you consider mainstream is better than what you don't consider mainstream.

    It's not about labels of political points of view but the details of the principles of those points of view.

    I chuckle when I read on these pages every day how bad the "extreme right wing", "ultra reich wing", "wingnuts", "AM raido", "Rush, Beck and Hannity" are. What you never ever do is detail why their political positions are wrong and why yours are right. In fact, it's a rarity if one doing the denigrating of the Repubs ever puts forth their own plan of action and why it should be considered and is better.

    I don't know what "mainstream" means and neither do any of you. What you take it for is when someone agrees with your point of view and the rest are extreme. No one gives pause that their own points might be extreme and not mainstream.

    Every comment is stating that conservative views are bad but no one says why. Up for it?

  • The Dude Abides Salt Lake City, UT
    April 24, 2011 12:04 p.m.

    The headline presupposes that the Republican party has a soul. And the opening sentence presupposes that it has a heart. Both are debatable in a party where the Eagle Forum has become to be seen as "not conservative enough".

  • Rich C West Jordan, UT
    April 24, 2011 11:42 a.m.

    We've been here before folks. In 1948 Truman joked that "Out of the great progress of this country, out of our great advances in achieving a better life for all, out of our rise to world leadership, the Republican leaders have learned nothing. Confronted by the great record of this county, and the tremendous promise of its future, all they do is croak, 'socialism.'"

    A return to realism at that time was led by Maine Republican Senator Margaret Chase Smith, who feared was harming not just it's electoral prospects but the country. That summer she would issued her "Declaration of Conscience" "I don't want to see a Republican ride to political victory on the Four Horsemen of Calumny- Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry, and Smear."

    She went on to say, "I don't believe the American people will uphold any political party that puts political exploitation above national interest."

  • goatesnotes Kamas, UT
    April 24, 2011 10:43 a.m.

    Who owns? The Party or the people? The people of America have always trumped the Party. Our governments, local, state and federal, are owned BY the people, FOR the people and OF the people. The Party will always yield to people, because Party power is derived from people. If you hate what the Party is doing, then the people have no one to blame but themselves. People ARE the Party. Slinging slurs like "party wingnuts" isn't very enlightening or useful in the discussion. Get involved and reshape the Party into an image more to your liking. Put the next caucus meeting in March 2012 into your calendar. Show up. Participate. Choose candidates who reflect your values. Nobody owns the Party but YOU.

  • homebrew South Jordan, UT
    April 24, 2011 10:33 a.m.

    Mike:: Your right about holding your nose and choosing the least smelly candidate. But this is a republican state. Full of idealogical short sighted voters who put people like Mike Waddoups, Karl Wimmer, and Cris Buttars in office again and again. Never considering a candidate if he is democrat. Things need to change, or we will just get the same ol same ol, every election cycle.

  • trytobereasonable Salt Lake City, UT
    April 24, 2011 9:39 a.m.

    Mr. Webb's (and commenters) defense of the Utah caucus system is dishonorable. It isn't a coincidence that this system results in such a low participation rate, despite being designed to be open. Many segments can't just put that date on their calendar. Some people work those hours. Single parents often can't get away. And even when political newcomers go to extreme lengths to make arrangements and attend, their voices are many times silenced by the momentum of those already in power. Utah's extremism won't change until the caucus system does.

  • Furry1993 Somewhere in Utah, UT
    April 24, 2011 9:11 a.m.

    We can start by getting rid of everyone who voted for (either time), or signed, HB477. We also need to take back the Republican party from the far right wingnuts, and make its candidates more in line with the more moderate Utah citizens' frame of mind.

  • Mike Richards South Jordan, Utah
    April 24, 2011 9:07 a.m.

    Two often voting becomes an exercise in holding your nose while you mark the ballot because both candidates stink.

    It shouldn't be that way.

    As a registered republican, is my allegiance to the party or am I duty bound to find, promote, and vote for a candidate who has the backbone and the ability to represent my principles and the principles of my family?

    Political parties are necessary evils. We are not Republican-Americans, nor are we Democrat-Americans. We are Americans. The same goes for Utah. We are not Republican-Utahns nor are we Democrat-Utahns.

    Integrity keeps us from voting for someone whose party platform violates our conscience. That same integrity should propel us to vote for people who understand the role they will fill as our representatives. They should understand the limits that we, the people of Utah, have placed on them. They should fully understand their authorized duties. Within that context there is room for discussion and debate. Outside of that context, its just mindless babbling.

    Lay down the party flag-waving. It was a bad idea when it began. It's still a bad idea.

  • RanchHand Huntsville, UT
    April 24, 2011 8:23 a.m.

    Who owns the Republican party (and the Democrats for that matter)?

    The one who brings the most Cold-Hard-Cash to the table, that's who.

  • Emophiliac Vernal, UT
    April 24, 2011 8:05 a.m.

    How hard was it to figure out that a party is controlled by those who donate money and by those that participate (i.e., show up)?

  • Roland Kayser Cottonwood Heights, UT
    April 24, 2011 7:49 a.m.

    The battle in the Republican party today reminds me of the Democrats in the sixties and seventies, where mainstream Democrats were being challenged by the "New Left" for control of the party. The New Left became too influential, the party became too extreme, and a big chunk of long-time Democratic voters deserted the party.

    The Republicans could learn from history.

  • John C. C. Payson, UT
    April 24, 2011 6:25 a.m.

    Don't get me wrong. I think I'm a moderate like most Utahns. It's just better to study both parties, compare with your priorities, and choose "the lesser of two evils" earlier rather than later. Then we won't be pinching our noses so tightly when we are in the voting booth.

  • John C. C. Payson, UT
    April 24, 2011 6:10 a.m.

    Mr. Webb best described who will own the soul of the Utah Republican Party:

    "...the task is pretty simple. Mainstream Republicans need to turn out in large numbers at precinct caucuses at 7 p.m., Tuesday, March 27, 2012, and mainstream Republicans will be back in charge. Put it on your calendar."

    Reword his statement to cover all parties and states and we identify who owns the political soul of America. Show up or forfeit your future to extremists.

    Never again complain about "the lesser of two evils" on the ballot. Neglect your neighborhood party organizing event and you choose one of those evils by default. Too many Utahns wear their "unaffiliated" party status as if it were a badge of honor. Actually it is a confession of willful neglect.