Group blasts credit union loans

Religious coalition says unfair short-term lending can hurt consumers

Return To Article
Add a comment
  • paydaylendingrep
    July 1, 2010 2:46 p.m.

    Eliminating short-term loans offered either by payday lenders or credit unions, does not eliminate the need for them. It's unwise to blame payday lenders or credit unions, as they are providing a service that is needed. The key is to use the loans responsibly which requires education on financial matters. Credit unions are tax-exempt, so they can offer lower rate loans, but the qualifications are stringent and their membership is restricted. That why people turn to payday lenders when in need.

  • landonhemsley
    July 1, 2010 9:11 a.m.

    Rather than forbid credit unions from giving these loans, they should rather be forced to publish online, in newspapers, and in libraries how much they make off these loans, how much they make off these loans as a percentage of their total income, and the default rate. Also, at the time of contract, fine print should be forbidden.

    I would only consider this type of lending predatory if it were done deceptively. A product is a product and as long as people know what they are potentially getting themselves into, they should have the opportunity to choose to get into it. So rather than doing away with the loans, let's try to reform how they must be presented and reported about to the public.

  • Belching Cow
    June 30, 2010 5:35 p.m.

    Hehehehe, that's funny you called them a conservative group. Your confused.

  • newsy
    June 30, 2010 3:23 p.m.

    I think Americans should have the privlege in a free society to get the kind of loan they want, even if they pay 500% to get it! Those who go for those loans must know what the interest rate is; otherwise, they wouldn't go for it. Try to get a small loan from a conventional bank and you can't get it. Let me be responsible for the loan I make. Don't punish the loaning company.

  • PeanutGallery
    June 30, 2010 3:17 p.m.

    Re: stanfunky: No, this Coalition of Religious Communities is NOT a conservative religious group. Rather, they sound like a fairly LIBERAL religious group, pushing for “social justice,” more government programs, and more government spending.

    If they don’t like this kind of loan, then they should simply encourage their followers to not use the loans. But if they try to get these loans prohibited, that’s going too far. As you have said, it’s a free-market offering. It’s legal and moral.

  • No One Of Consequence
    June 30, 2010 2:02 p.m.

    The solution here is for the people who see the need to fill it. These people need to form a credit union with their own money and offer low-rate loans to the people who would otherwise use payday loans or credit union payday alternative loans. Show the rest of us how to make their business model work, if it is possible to do so.

  • PeanutGallery
    June 30, 2010 1:52 p.m.

    If these loans are a bad deal (and they are), then, fine, this group doesn’t need to get them. But for some people they might be a temporary life-saver. If the credit unions (and pay-day lenders) are clear and open about the terms of the loan, then it’s a legal, voluntary contract. We don’t need more do-gooders to further increase the size of our obese nanny-state government, to protect us from ourselves. Personally, I prefer freedom.

  • stanfunky
    June 30, 2010 11:14 a.m.

    This is a 'free market' solution as defined by the conservatives in this state. Yet a conservative, religious group, is protesting it. Interesting. If there is demand for something, supply is provided, and the only way to stop such supply is...gasp...BIG GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION! REGULATION! Guess that means these loans won't be going away anytime soon.

  • MenaceToSociety
    June 30, 2010 11:02 a.m.

    Religious groups should stick to what they do well: descriminating against people who are different than themselves, putting down other religions, and starting wars.

  • SoUtBoy25
    June 30, 2010 10:50 a.m.

    Why are banks not doing this? Aren't they the big bad guys? Let's face it, the CU's are in dire need to make money to offset bad loan portfolios. Of course they hide their problems by "merging" problem CU's with big CU's (see So. Ut Fed CU)rather than failing. They never write off bad loans banking on the market coming back to maintain their fragile reputation for soundness. For the sake of us all I hope it works out because we don't need another S&L crisis.

    Of course, Banks too have considered these loans but most did not want the reputational risk. I say CU payday loans are fine. For once, even if for the wrong reason, the CU's are serving the underserved.

  • KOY
    June 30, 2010 10:47 a.m.

    I'm sure these people mean well but a red flag goes up for me when I hear the term "social justice". It is code for socialism/communism for the far left. If church groups are trying to help the poor with there own money that's great but if part of their agenda is to get the government to even the playing field at the expense tax payers then they are moving to socialism, which leads to communism. The far left is making a huge effort to infiltrate churches to accomplish their goals.
    Remember: social justice-bad, equal justice-good!

  • Last Stand
    June 30, 2010 10:43 a.m.

    I despise the payday loan stores and their predatory practices but as long as their is demand for those type of products, there will be supply. The entitlement complex in our society beguiles us into believing we have a right to borrow on credit. As soon as financial responsibility is understood by all, then demand for these products will cease.

  • stewy927
    June 30, 2010 10:00 a.m.

    I share the concerns of the CORC over the high cost of payday loan products. I recognize the damaging effect that payday loans have on an individual’s finances. Credit unions initiated these programs specifically to help consumers move away from payday lending. Unlike “payday lenders,” I don’t let members get caught in a cycle of larger and larger short-term loans. Instead, I work closely with members to pay off the debt over time. The huge difference between my work as a credit union employee and typical “payday lenders” is that I strive to help members through short-term crisis, and I help provide a path back to access to conventional credit sources. I offer members alternatives, such as financial counseling or less expensive products. CU payday loan alternatives are considerably less expensive than traditional payday loans -- a fact that cannot be so easily dismissed. Alternative products are exactly that--alternatives to payday loans. No one is saying these are perfect loans, but by definition higher risk means higher cost. I do not accept the implied notion that people who are in short-term financial difficulty should simply be shut out of access to credit.

  • Fredd
    June 30, 2010 9:45 a.m.

    If a high number of these loans are being written off they should not offer them.

  • Danish American
    June 30, 2010 9:29 a.m.

    Simple solution. Don't get the loans. Perhaps Rebecca could offer a better deal. I know I don't want my money loaned to poor risks.

  • LVIS
    June 30, 2010 9:05 a.m.

    So, Rebecca Palmer, perhaps you could have included in your article what the loss experience for the CU's is on these types of loans. How many of these loans end up being charged off? What is the cost to the CU (to process just one loan)? How many must be repeatedly extended? How does the CU loan compare to the Payday loan?

    Maybe this group should also protest the price of tickets to a Jazz game.

  • shamrock
    June 30, 2010 8:16 a.m.

    Oh leave those little ol' credit unions alone. After all, as Anatole France so wisely reminded us: "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

  • lwr
    June 30, 2010 8:08 a.m.

    No bank or credit union is in the business of losing money. The high interest rates are necessary to cover the losses that they will be taking because of the higher defaults on these types of loans. After this criticism, if I was running a credit union, I would just stop lending to anyone that didn't have the credit to get a normal loan. They get poked in the eye for trying to help people who have completely ruined their credit. The critics should get a life and find a way to help these people instead of trying to cut off all credit to them.

  • Florien Wineriter
    June 30, 2010 7:48 a.m.

    In paragraph five Humanism should be capitalized as are all the other religious philosophies.Florien Wineriter,past president, Humanists of Utah.

  • Rock32
    June 30, 2010 7:44 a.m.

    Fortunately I havent had to use these loans but for those that do, it can be a lifesaver. I dont blame the credit unions as they are providing a service that is needed. The key is to use it responsibly and that goes back to the individual and the need for education on financial matters. I have found credit unions to be very fair. For this type of loan they do have to charge enough interest to cover their losses in case other people dont re-pay their loans. Simple solution is that if you dont like the loan terms then dont use the loan.

  • xscribe
    June 30, 2010 7:36 a.m.

    Isn't this the capitalism people keep talking about? If you don't have the personal responibility to NOT take such a loan - which I'm sure shows you the interest rate at which you'll pay it back - then that's your problem, not the bank's or the credit union's. If there's no demand for these loans, they will go away.

  • 42istheanswer
    June 30, 2010 7:30 a.m.

    I don't think the loans are as much the problem with the terms. They really should bring back usary laws.

  • SME
    June 30, 2010 7:00 a.m.

    "I thought credit unions were so you'd have fair stuff for people, both sides," said Dorothy Talbert.
    Perhaps Ms. Talbert and Esquire can start their own credit union and show everyone how its done. They can be "fair and just", of course then they would have to take the risk of losing their money. Much easier to snipe with no skin in the game.

  • noneck62
    June 30, 2010 6:49 a.m.

    May I make the respectfully suggestion that the members of CORC mind their own business concerning Credit Unions. In other words, mind your own business on everything.

  • My2Cents
    June 30, 2010 5:44 a.m.

    So why are they targeting the Credit Unions and not the PayDay lenders? This group seems to be a bunch of employees of Payday lenders fearing losing their jobs or people with outstanding loans with the PayDay loan sharks. A little kickback credit on loans with them?

    At least banks and credit unions have some regulatory controls on doing business. Has this group lost touch with reality and who the real criminals in short term lending is? They should be marching on the Pay Day lenders stores who are their enemy of the group. Or even the legislators to shut down all lending of this type as predatory. That's why loan sharking is illegal, its predatory just as all payday lenders are. How ever, the credit unions are under state and federal regulations and the pay day lenders have no restrictions or regulations on them.

    Credit Unions are taking business away from the sharks and this looks like willful attack by these sharks to draw attention to their competition in a multibillion dollar predatory industry in Utah.

  • SJ Bobkins
    June 30, 2010 3:28 a.m.

    If you disapprove of the money first before social responsibility way of doing business, you first need to push the legislature to pass the consumer protection laws to force banks and credit unions to play "nice". Utah has the least consumer friendly "folks on the hill" of any state in the nation. They sold their collective soul long again to rid the books of usury laws under the premise that doing so would bring in regional credit card processing centers with lots of slightly above minimum wage jobs. Find out who pays for the campaigns of legislators and who they work for, before voting. Most states have made it very hard for payday and mini loan strip mall lenders to operate, but Utah, well forget it. You deserve who you vote for and Utah has so much to be embarrassed about. The protestors have no effect because these people will do anything for more money. Sex and money corrupt anyone and everyone, just recall the scandals of so many politicians and religious figures. Without laws, anything goes.

  • Esquire
    June 29, 2010 7:51 p.m.

    If credit unions are offering payday loans, shame on them. Why can't we have usury laws back?