I agree with Cindy about the mug shots on the web site. A person wheather
proven guilty or not gets their picture put on the web site. Why? Just because
one is arrested that is not proof that they are guilty. What Utah Law allows
this? Isn't this deformation of character when one is not guilty?Why not
put the 5 people involved names and mug shots on the jail web site also?
I agree with Cindy, the Utah County Jail has a web site where they put up
everyones pictures with their crimes. Since we pay the taxes for this facility
to operate I want to know why these sicko's aren't having to smile for a mug
shot. After all in Happy Valley Adultry is still against the law, though rarely
prosecuted, I think they deserve some public humility. Sad for the spouses of
I know the details of the case because of my job, don't ask me how. For those of
you who want some detail, here it goes. For those of you who don't, just skip
ahead.All of the men were involved with the same woman sexually OFF DUTY.
The reason why they got fired is because they all signed an agreement to avoid
adultery. So, what got them in trouble was the fact that they were married, not
that they were having sex. What is a bit disgusting is that all the men knew
about each other, and even referred the woman's services to each other.
The female involved was a married woman.I guess they failed to leave that out.I
would hope she is prosecuted.What was she thinking or should I say which male
was she thinking about during these activities?
why is it that it is public record and anyone can look up the mug shots and all
the details of anyone that has been arrested and booked in the utah county jail,
but it is a big hush hush when it comes to the names of all involved in this
discusting act these 5 people were involved in. The county jail is more than
happy to plaster all the people who have been arrested for the last 20 or so
years but they sure cant make the public aware of the things that their
employees are doing.. If there is only 1 female involed does this mean she was
doing this for job security or could we call this prostitution?????
Joe Moe said, "But I still believe in a case like this one that common decency
and discretion ruled the day. Let's not forget: they committed no crime, and the
proper authorities are handling in fine."JP says, "The news today
pays too much time spoon feeding us everything, it's great when we're given the
chance to exercise our brains for once."Where was the decency in the
DN's special link to the pornographically-styled Starr report on Clinton? Talk
about voyeuristic! If it's about liberals and Dems, it's smackdown time for
these self-righteous guardians. If it comes close to sacred bovines, e.g., Utah
County cops, COVER IT UP! Little wonder Utah and Utah County do not engender
trust among business, voters and religion consumers outside and inside the fold.
In homogeneity we trust!The reporting makes a Victorian look licentious.
They say the devil is in the details...and one hopes that they weren't forced to
resign for purely private behavior because our community as a whole finds their
actions "unseemly". Please tell me it was on the job. Then I can relax.
Otherwise, how do you spell l-a-w-s-u-i-t?
Spare the details Sheriff's Dept.....Lets keep Happy Valley happy LOL
JP: The fact is, we don't know what happened. We can imagine, though, and what
is going through our imaginations is probably much more salacious than reality.
On the other hand, some of those sheriffs are pretty hot. It's too
bad that these days civilians seldom get the opportunity to get out of a
speeding ticket the old-fashioned way.
Utah County is really going down hill. Arresting a grandma for not watering
grass, a corrupt councilwoman taking bribes from developers, and now this!
re: What. Your request for more details can be categorized under "The dumbing
down of america". Why does the article have to go into anymore
detail? Isn't it clear enough what happened. 4 dudes and 1 woman. C'mon isn't it
pretty evident what happened, or do you need a play by play with computer
animation? Why does everything have to be idiot proof? (That's not a personal
attack, that's a marketing term).The news today pays too much time
spoon feeding us everything, it's great when we're given the chance to exercise
our brains for once.
Forced to resign is more like it and the 20 year vet might get to retire with
benefits, that is a nice send off, while the junior employees just walk. I hope
they all sue if he gets retirement.
If it was on duty then of course they should be gone. we dont pay cops to engage
in sex on duty. sounds like the sheriff did the right thing by investigating the
case and the officers leaving rather than spending more tax dollars by waisting
time when they knew they were wrong.
To What: that was actually very witty! Thanks for the chuckle, seriously. And
you make a good point, to a point.But I still believe in a case like
this one that common decency and discretion ruled the day. Let's not forget:
they committed no crime, and the proper authorities are handling in fine.
Makes the story.Next weeks headline "Man Put in Some Jail for Doing
Something at That One Place by the Thing. Certain Agencies are Looking for That
I think it safe to say the left the "what" out in order to avoid being
voyeuristic. I really don't think it's our concern! I was actually pleasantly
surprised at the restraint, because many media sources would take advantage of a
sensationalistic event like this. Kudos to the reporter and editors!
I ain't no reporter, but I believe the "what" was left out of this story. What,
exactly, did they do?