1 of 3
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Judas gives Jesus Christ a kiss on the cheek as a sign to the soldier that Jesus is the one who should be arrested in this scene from the Bible Video series.

Jesus met with his disciples one last time before his death. Together they shared the traditional Jewish Passover meal, Jesus’ Last Supper. During this meal, Jesus revealed troubling news:

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. Then the disciples looked one on another, doubting of whom he spake. ... Jesus answered, He it is, to whom I shall give a sop, when I have dipped it. And when he had dipped the sop, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon” (John 13:21-22, 26).

“Then … Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests, And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time (Judas Iscariot) sought opportunity to betray (Jesus)” (Matthew 26:14-16).

But events unfolded far different than Judas had expected or intended.

“When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. … Then Judas ... when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. … And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself” (Matthew 27:1-5).

What is the meaning of the 30 pieces of silver?

• 30 pieces of silver as a tithing

Some Bible readers have suggested that Judas’s betrayal of Jesus was as a tithing of the expensive ointment used to by Mary to anoint Jesus:

“Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment. Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him, Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor? This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein” (John 12:3-6).

In this interpretation, Jesus is worthy only a small percentage of the cost of the ointment, that fraction being a trifling amount. Judas did not think Jesus was so valuable.

• 30 pieces of silver as the price of a slave

If we turn to the Law of Moses (Exodus 21:32), we learn that if an animal gores a slave to death, the animal’s owner must pay 30 shekels for the loss of the slave. The slave is valued at 30 shekels.

From this perspective, Jesus is priced as a slave. His death is the value of the death of a slave.

• 20 pieces of silver: Joseph being sold as a slave into Egypt as prefiguration of Jesus

Others have seen the story of Joseph as a symbol or prefiguration of Jesus Christ. Genesis 37 describes Joseph, son of Jacob, as the favored son who dreams and interprets dreams. Joseph’s older brothers are jealous that their father lavishes attention on the youngest son. They are irritated that Joseph interprets dreams in his own favor, describing the brothers as bowing in servitude to Joseph. The elder brothers conspire to kill Joseph, but later Judah convinces them to sell Joseph as a slave.

“Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. And his brethren were content. Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and they brought Joseph into Egypt” (Genesis 37:28-29).

Though the exact sale price is different between Joseph and Jesus (20 shekels vs 30 shekels), many have imagined that inflation would make the 20 pieces of silver in Joseph’s time equal to the 30 shekels in Jesus’s time.

• 30 pieces of silver as a trifling, meaningless amount

All of these above insights are compelling and informative. But the insight I find most compelling comes from the ancient Sumerian culture.

The Sumerians had a flourishing culture from about 4000 B.C. – 2000 B.C. in ancient southern Mesopotamia (southern Iraq). Over the years archaeologists have discovered and translated hundreds of thousands of Sumerian tablets, which record their stories, songs and sayings.

What has been discovered? Whenever an ancient Sumerian wanted to express the idea that something was worthless, they would say “It is considered a mere 30 shekels worth.”

Since 30 shekels of silver was actually a considerable sum of money during the Sumerian culture, this seems like a strange and contradictory way to describe something as worthless. Why did the Sumerians come up with this statement in the first place, to describe worthless and valueless objects?

In the Sumerian culture, 60 was their foundational, base number, much like 10 is in our culture today. They used base-60 for measuring time (still with us today in the concepts of a 24-hour day, 60 minutes in an hour and 60 seconds in a minute) and geometric units (360 degree circle).

In the minds of the Sumerians, 60 was complete, full, useful, productive, necessary, the basis for measuring and valuing all things.

Thirty is not!

Thirty is half of 60.

Therefore, 30 is incomplete, not full, not useful, not productive, not necessary, and useless for measuring and valuing things.

Hence, “30 shekels of silver” means a trivially useless amount of no value.

Anciently, this saying “30 shekels of silver” became a popular proverbial statement. And as the years rolled on, this phrase entered wider use among other cultures in the ancient Middle East, including ancient Israel.

Though these cultures modified the use of meaning of “30 shekels of silver” the phrase continued to retain, at its core, the meaning of useless, low value, trifling, incomplete, worthless.

8 comments on this story

• Jesus who was deemed as worthless gained all and invited us to share in everything

What does the 30 shekels of silver mean about Jesus? His life had no apparent value to those who rejected him. The inimitable prophet Isaiah expressed this feeling well in Isaiah 53.

Yet what a contrast when we realize that he who lost everything, gained all and then turned to give us everything.

He who was deemed a trifle, a slave, incomplete, worthless, of no value, won for himself and for us everything, the value of eternal life in the presence of God.