WASHINGTON — Normally quarrelsome House Republicans lined up Wednesday to pass a boldly conservative budget that relies on nearly $5 trillion in spending cuts to eliminate deficits over the next decade, calls for repealing the health care law and envisions major transformations in both the tax code and Medicare.
Much of the savings would come from Medicaid, food stamps and welfare, programs that aid the low-income, although details were sketchy. Republicans said their plan would help the economy and hard-pressed Americans.
"It takes us off the path of debt and doubt and despair that this administration has dogmatically followed and it restores us to policies that have repeatedly brought prosperity to our nation," said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif.
Democrats rebutted that the GOP numbers didn't add up and their policies were wrong-headed.
"People who are running in place today are not going to be moving forward under the Republican budget, they're going to be falling back," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.
A final vote was expected in early evening. The Republican-controlled Senate is likely to approve its version by week's end.
The budgets themselves are non-binding and do not require a presidential signature. Instead, once the House and Senate agree on a common plan, lawmakers will have to draft legislation to carry out the program that Republicans have vowed to follow in the wake of campaign victories last fall that gave them in control of Congress.
Still, House passage of a budget would mark a significant victory for Speaker John Boehner and the leadership, which has struggled mightily to overcome differences within a fractious rank and file.
An equally notable second triumph appeared on the horizon. Legislation to stabilize the system of payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients is expected to clear the House on Thursday, and President Barak Obama's declaration of support during the day enhanced its chances in the Senate.
It includes a requirement for upper-income Medicare beneficiaries to pay more for their coverage, a provision that Republicans hailed as a triumph in their drive to curtail the growth of benefit programs.
There was nothing bipartisan about the budget debate, though.
The House plan calls for $5.4 trillion in deficit reduction over a decade, including about $2 trillion from repeal of the law known as Obamacare. Nearly $1 trillion would be saved from from Medicaid and CHIP, health care programs for the low-income, and $1 billion from other unspecified benefit programs. Another $500 billion would come from general government programs that already have been squeezed in recent years by deficit-reduction agreements between Congress and the White House.
The budget outline itself provides few if any details of the cuts envisioned, although once they appear in legislation they are highly likely to spark a veto showdown with Obama.
The president has also vowed to defend the health care law that stands as his signature domestic achievement. The House has already voted more than 60 times to repeal it in part or whole, but for the first time since the law passed, House members have a willing partner in the Senate.
The prospect of sending Obama legislation to repeal the health care law contributed to the unusual degree of unity among House conservatives. Without a budget in place, they noted, the repeal measure would not have special protection against a Senate filibuster — and would not reach the White House.
As they have in recent years, House Republicans call for the transformation of Medicare into a voucher-like program. Senate Republicans, already worried about defending their majority in 2016, omitted that from their plan.
Both the House and Senate plans call for an overhaul of the tax code.
Defense spending caused a few anxious moments for Boehner and the leadership as the budget moved through the House Budget Committee and across the floor.
As drafted by the panel, chaired by Rep. Tom Price of Georgia, it called for $610 billion for the Pentagon for the coming budget year. Of that, $94 billion would come from an account that supports overseas military operations, and $21.5 billion would be dependent on offsetting spending cuts elsewhere.
An attempt to raise the level to $612 billion and guarantee it is all available awaited a vote as part of the leadership's strategy of maximizing support for the overall budget.
Obama's budget called for $612 billion in defense spending, and Republicans were eager to equal if not exceed his recommendation.
House Republicans said their budget would yield a modest surplus of $13 billion in 2024 and $33 billion in 2025.
Democrats scoffed at the claim, noting it relied in part on allowing $900 billion in popular tax breaks to expire as scheduled.
By contrast, Obama's budget would fail to eliminate deficits, despite the presence of nearly $2 trillion in higher taxes.
In a years-old ritual, much of the day was consumed by debate and certain rejection of alternatives. House Democrats, progressives and the Congressional Black Caucus all advanced no-balance budget alternatives that called for more spending on domestic programs and higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
The conservative Republican Study Committee proposed far deeper spending cuts than the Budget Committee recommended, and a delay in Medicare eligibility to age 67 for younger workers, and a balanced budget in six years.
AP reporter Erica Werner contributed to this story.