1 of 10
The Arizona Republic, Rob Schumacher, Pool, File, Associated Press
FILE - In this May 21, 2013 file photo, Jodi Arias points to her family as a reason for the jury to give her a life in prison sentence instead of the death penalty, during the penalty phase of her murder trial at Maricopa County Superior Court in Phoenix.

PHOENIX — A judge Monday refused to lift restrictions on camera coverage of the penalty phase retrial in Jodi Arias' murder case.

Judge Sherry Stephens rejected a request from local television stations to allow video footage to be broadcast 30 minutes after the end of each day's proceedings.

Instead, Stephens is sticking by her previous order that no footage can be broadcast until after the verdict.

Arias last year was convicted of murder in the 2008 killing of her ex-boyfriend at his suburban Phoenix home, but jurors couldn't reach a decision on her sentence. The retrial of the penalty phase begins Sept. 29. Jurors will determine whether Arias receives the death penalty or life in prison.

A media lawyer had argued Stephens' video restrictions deny the public their constitutional right to witness criminal proceedings, but the judge said in her latest order that she is protecting Arias' right to a fair trial.

Stephens said her restrictions "provide for the least restrictive media access to the trial that will protect the defendant's right to a fair penalty phase retrial."

A delay of 30 minutes until after each day's court session ended "will not diminish or eliminate the likelihood of harm," the judge said.

Arias' lawyers had argued that daily broadcasts of the trial might lead to defense witnesses backing out for fear of being harassed or threatened.

David Bodney, the attorney who represented television stations in their request for less restrictive camera coverage, said the judge's ruling Monday was expected but that it is a setback for transparency.

"It practically prohibits the vast majority of the interested public from witnessing what happens in the sentencing phase of the trial," Bodney said.

Arias' first trial was broadcast live, but the judge denied that right this time around.

Prosecutors and defense lawyers declined to comment on the latest development.

Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi said during a Sept. 15 hearing that the motion to allow the release of video footage was simply a desire by the media "to exploit this trial for profit."

Prosecutor Juan Martinez didn't object to daily video broadcasts, noting that Arias has sought media coverage herself, offering interviews before, during and after the trial.

Martinez said Arias' defense is just seeking "to manage or attempt to control what's going out on the air waves."

Meanwhile in Colorado, a judge is considering a similar request from media attorneys to allow cameras in the courtroom for the trial of James Holmes, the defendant in the suburban Denver movie theater mass shooting.

Holmes is set for trial in December on charges of killing 12 people and wounding 70 in the 2012 attack. He has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity in the death penalty case.

Prosecutors and defense lawyers in that case say witnesses would be vulnerable to harassment and threats if cameras are allowed in court during the trial.

A ruling is expected next week.