Considering the magnitude of damage both emotional and physical caused by the consumption of liquor, wouldn't it be better to have prohibition of alcohol beverages than to consider relaxing the state's liquor laws? Wouldn't it be better to appear "peculiar" to out-of-state visitors than to encourage liquor consumption? Wouldn't it be better to have a loss of revenue and profits than to promote the consumption of a harmful and a gateway chemical?

Gene Speakman

Mt. Pleasant