What in Tucket?: It's always a bit dangerous to make blanket
generalizations. My school teaches all of those you mentioned, and much more.
Government schools should teach cursive, phonetics, and Singapore math. Since
they do not I would send my child to another school. It is not always how much
we spend, but what the teachers teach.
Taxes are actually at a historic low.I would say that the
underfunding of public schools is part of the problem. Cutting taxes does not
solve every equation. Services come at a cost and that applies to police and
fire departments, city services like sewer and water and schools.If
we want to continue to be successful as a state we need to start investing in
our children, not supporting older people who are healthy enough to keep
Her reference to the famous Coleman Report of 1966 is irresponsibly misapplied.
The report’s conclusion at the time, which is still valid today, is that
the largest predictors of student success are the poverty and the socio-economic
background of student and their peers. Maybe that should say something to us
about our society’s larger approach to poverty and social inequality, but
to use the report to say that a school’s “resources contribute very
little to student outcomes” therefore schools don’t need money
cynically misses its point and doesn’t even make sense when you think
The real innovation today would be reversing the consistent trend in our state
of almost three decades of declining state funding for public education and work
to appropriately fund the public school system. We have to pay for
buildings, light bulbs, paint, carpet cleaning, heating, teaching materials,
copy machines, white boards, staff, custodians, teachers, administrators, etc.
to maintain our public school system. Instead of undermining support of a
public school system that the public has invested in for decades, we should be
finding ways to improve our commitment, to more fully realize our vision as a
public. Ms. Cooke can continue to wallow in the stagnant anti-government,
anti-public naysaying of the tea partiers, but it is past time for the political
adults to pay the bills for our public education. Despite Sutherland’s
wish to privatize any public service, the public has consistently taken the long
view, supporting a public school system for over a century that educates ALL
students, using public funds, accountable to the public, all for the common
I will gladly support the tax increase to pay my children's teachers a
living wage. I'm tired of them getting "interns" and "student
teachers". They need real teachers will some experience. Pay them more and
they will come.It really is that simple.
Competition brings out the best in innovation and efficiency and results in the
best products for the consumer. In this case the product is education for our
children. The best way to accomplish competition is to tie the education money
to the child and not to a school district. It is the economic law of supply and
demand. The more private schools competing for the child (and the education
money tied to him or her) the price of educating our children would be
drastically more efficient and the better schools would be paying good money to
keep the good teachers. How did this country ever survive it's
first 100+ years when a majority of it's children were taught at home or in
Since this is the Sutherland Institute talking, it's no surprise there is
no consideration of a more progressive income tax system, which could partially
pay for more education. Utah's overall tax structure is regressive.I wonder if the writer has spent any time teaching in a public school.
I have and here is my take. Education is one field where more labor is needed.
I can tell you what teachers want is a second adult in the classroom! Fund
teachers' aides and pay them something!Schools should teach
basic and well rounded skills. It should be balanced between STEM and the arts.
The arts are an industry too, and some students need this entry point.Also, teach skills necessary for formation of Worker Self Directed
Enterprises. For many kids, this will prove the only way out of a negative
labor market for them, in the years ahead.
Christineit would be beneficial if you were to give concrete examples,
rather than just cite broad areas.we need to pay our teachers more.
it's like watering the garden, not enough and the plants die so what you
did use was wasted.imp7another jab at the legislature.yawnUS News and World Reports recently rate our state govt
among the top 5 in the country.birder,it's difficult to
invest in solid families when the definition of a family is so fluid. we reap
what we sow.
Impartial7 makes a very good point - we need tighter conflict of interest laws.
The amount of money the pertinent legislator has received from K12, inc. over
the years should be public knowledge.Birder, many of the things you
mentioned reflect the current workplace. Children must be taught to work in
teams while being held responsible for individual effort, to use technology, and
to respect their teachers and work hard to learn the material because those
skills are required in today's workforce.I agree that in the
end we need to invest in families - it's parents, not teachers or the
public school system, that make the biggest difference in children's lives.
Christine, this is the same old argument from the Sutherland Institute.
Education has been starved of resources in this state and then labeled as
failing. That is unethical. Time to step up and adequately fund our schools. The
rhetoric in your piece is a false narrative.
How about we try the delivery of reasonable class sizes for our teachers?
How innovative to roll out studies from 1966 and 1994. How comforting to know a
spokesperson from Sutherland thinks she has all the answers to something that
teachers devote their lives too. Want to know where Utah needs to spend more
money? Talk to a public school teacher.
I don't think that any of the so-called innovations of the last ten years
have improved things for students. I'm referring to more technology, more
testing, Common Core, and an emphasis on group work over individual effort. In
addition, classrooms are packed, paperwork for teachers has more than doubled,
and we are getting more dysfunctional children in the system. Nothing will fix the education system without investing in solid families. I would put skills of those of us educated many years ago up against
anything we are getting now. I went through elementary school in the sixties. We
respected our teachers, did our work, learned to read, write, and do math. Our
lives didn't revolve around our phones like they do today. I know those
days are gone for good, but I don't think "innovation" is the
answer. That word gives me nightmares as a teacher. What's next for no
We've tried it this way for years. We now face a teacher shortage due to
underpaid and demoralized teachers. I submit that keeping our schools resource
poor in order to force teachers to improve has been tried - and failed (and
failed rather miserably at that). Teachers don't improve when you critique
and underpay them - they quit!It's one thing to say that more
money doesn't help, but there's a point where too little money hurts.
And we are below that point (evidence = teacher shortage).
What if we already have?It's pretty ignorant to assume that for
years now, Utah educators have been shortchanged and haven't made
adjustments, right? Perhaps we've innovated as much as we can with the
small amount of investment as we've received? At some point we need to
admit that public education needs public investment, not just lip service.In fact, I'm willing to compare the innovation that educators have
made in public education here in Utah to that of any other industry. So when are we going to invest into public education?Are we going
to wait until our classrooms are double the size and turnover rate is above 70
I'am not opposed to a well thought out tax increase to fun education, but
not one penny to vouchers.
In Utah, public school "innovation" is whatever some legislator is
trying to sell to the education department. Whether it be poorly functioning
software, i-pads or i-pad knockoffs, if a Utah legislator can make big bucks
off of it, they will approve the expense to Utah taxpayers.