Published: Wednesday, Aug. 27 2014 11:35 a.m. MDT
I don't get this lady. You move to a state where many people feel it's
necessary to have 10 kids. You even comment how much you like the fact that you
are not the only one with an oversized family. Then you complain that the
schools don't have enough money.........um, why do you think the schools
have no money? And the ironic thing is, because I only have one kid, I end up
paying way more in taxes, don't get a fee waiver, don't get free
lunch, I don't qualify for any programs. Which makes sense, the fewer kids
you have, the more you should pay so someone else can have 9 kids then complain
the schools aren't good enough.
The State of Wyoming has a booming economy because of its vast fossil fuel
industry.And it rakes in a lot more money in taxes per capita than
Utah because of that.The only way Utah will be able to match
Wyoming's public school system is to raise taxes . . . Or find some other
way to generate revenue.Abstaining from lottery participation is a
bad move for Utah.
I am not throwing tomatoes, I am standing up clapping! This needed to be said. I
spent almost $1000 to register my three kids for school this year and also get
frustrated by every single point you made.If you decide to run for a
position in the state educational board YOU HAVE MY VOTE.
This article is funny in its, not so thinly veiled, attempts to convince readers
that we need to spend even more money on education in Utah. The assertion that
we need to spend as much as Wyoming is ridiculous. We have one of the most
efficient educational models in the country considering amount spent per pupil
vs academic achievement. This article encourages us to spend more money per
pupil to marginalize academic returns. I wonder if the author of the article has
family members that are teachers? Makes one wonder the motivation behind writing
Instead of fees, the education system needs to learn how to be efficient. They
are top heavy administration and lack teachers. The focus should be on adding
teachers. Removing unruly students.Over half of our property taxes
go to the schools. Along with monies collected from Utah lands etc. They have a
huge budget.The solution they come up with every year is more money.
For example, I had a teacher that came in with a hang over most days. She would
wear her sweat pants, dark sunglasses and put her head down on her desk. She
would have a student turn out the light and put a movie in. That was my class.
Now explain how paying this teacher more is going to help? Now if you have a
skilled teacher, that loves teaching and students are engaged. Then it makes
sense to pay more to keep that student.
Amen, sister! And if your child should want to join the marching band?...watch
out! We will end up paying over a $1000 this year for just one of ours for
mandatory and extracurricular fees.
I, too, disliked the fees when my stepkids were in school. But people with lots
of kids get tax breaks that more than make up for the fees.
Should have gone with the fee waiver. Maybe you could read yesterday's
article on homeschooling. One mom said she only spends $150 for curriculum for
the year. Sure, all the extra activities to help your kids socialize will be
spendy. Maybe you should move back to Wyoming before high school as the fees are
higher. Or join in fundraising efforts at school or petition the state
legislature. Without PTA watchdogs the schools would have less money because
everyone is after the trust lands money.
What is the difference between asking for a fee waiver and getting school
services without a fee. They both come from the government. I think the idea of
schools giving away computer equipment is ridiculous. Why is it OK to take other
people's money in the form of taxes and give them to others in the form of
computer equipment. The featured Mother says she wants to be independent, but at
the same time is complaining that the government is not giving her kids
You CHOSE to have 9 kids, perhaps you should take some personal responsibility
and contribute toward their education.I have no kids, and I am more
than happy to contribute my tax dollars towards a public education system to
provide for a growing economy and educated populace. However, there is no reason
that you--the person contributing to the stress on the system by having large
families and taking more tax deductions for dependents--shouldn't
contribute as well.
Utah talks the game, but when it comes time to walk the walk, it fails.It essentially takes two incomes to raise a family...yet the wife belongs in
the home. We tell kids to get an education "Be Smart" from
President Hinckley...yet we want to cut Student loans. So those that would
benefit most from an education (the one making minimum wage selling you cheap
groceries at Walmart) cannot advance in life. And when he asks for help to feed
his family...we call him lazy and try to cut his food stamps.We are
pro-life...until the mother who probably cannot afford to feed her child needs
assistance. But when the baby is born, the Relief Society will bring meals for
a week.We are trying to make a same-sex family anything but a
family. But don't call me Monday nights...Alcohol rips apart
families...but prescription drug abuse is ok.
I agree with Noodlekaboodle; the reason we have such high school fees is because
of large families the tax base cannot support. If you'd like to not pay
school fees, move to any other state where families are generally smaller.
I thought conservatives believe in personal responsibility. If you
make the choice to have lots of kids then it is your responsibility to provide
for them. Why should everyone else have to fork over more so you can pay less?
You chose to have 9 kids, and while I'm all for contributing to the common
pool for education (via tases), I shouldn't have to pay more for your kids
so you can pay less.You do make a good point about the way Utah
manages its educational system here though, it is definitely a joke. The
legislature would rather spend million on pet projects, payoffs (Herberts
freeway scandal), defending "message bills" and fighting equality rather
than put that money to good use educating the kids of Utah.
Ms Francis,Are you serious?You have 9 children. At
$7000 per school year per child, you will have received over $750,000 worth of
education if you send all of your kids to public school for 12 years.I presume that you have 11 deductions. Do you think that the taxes that you
pay cover anywhere near that?And you are complaining about paying
some additional fees?Gotta tell you. That takes some gall.
Maybe the letter writer is confused. The State being "family friendly"
doesn't mean you won't have to pay for what your kids do (go to
school, participate in activities, etc). The phrase "family friendly"
isn't about money. Being "family friendly" means we encourage
families (but you still have to pay the bills). You will still have to pay a
little for each child and for activities they want to be involved in (even in a
"family friendly" State).The State being predominately
"Conservative" also doesn't mean you won't have to pay for the
things your kids do. Or that we will tax somebody else to pay for what your
kids do. But being "Conservative" IS about money. It means the State
will tax you as little as they possibly can... and individual families will have
to care for themselves more than in a State where they will take it from another
family so you don't have to pay for it.Some people criticize
Utah incessantly because they don't charge families MORE for each child.
We aren't into that. But we also aren't into taxing somebody else to
pay your fees.
The bald fact is that Utah (the so-called best-managed state) does not have
"one of the best education systems in the country," and it's not
the fault of the teachers. With our demographic we should lead the nation in
educational performance, but we stagnate in the mediocre range because we
WON'T pay the price. Last in the nation in funding is a
terrible wound that will not heal.
Fantastic article!! My parents never let us take waivers or free lunch. We
worked off every fee we couldn't pay. The world needs more of that.
from article: “Please look into the fee waiver form instead,” they
suggested. (Really? This conservative state encourages taking a government
handout over old-fashioned work?) Although I discovered that our family did
indeed qualify for fee waivers (Who doesn’t?), the independent inside of
me didn’t allow such a move."Although I understand that
this mother is upset with all the mandatory school fees in Utah--I am too--I
found this part very humorous: "..while Wyoming spent over
$19,000...It certainly didn’t help my children’s morale when they
recently heard from Wyoming friends that high school freshmen had each received
an iPad, while the sophomores through seniors were each given a new
laptop."On the one hand, this woman doesn't want to take a
'government handout' & then goes on to extoll the virtues of the
'government handout' in Wyoming schools. Just thought it
very funny she abhors taking handouts if its obvious--& doesn't mind at
all if it seems a part of her Wyoming schools. SOMEBODY, somewhere, is paying
for those kids in Wyoming to have free iPads & laptops given to them.
Hey mufasta –“We have one of the most efficient
educational models in the country considering amount spent per pupil vs academic
achievement”Oh I see . . . So Utah had found a way to pay very
little money to provide an education for its children that is ALMOST
adequate.Good for you.“Makes one wonder the
motivation behind writing this article.”. . . Not really.Ever hear of “Social Responsibility?” . . . How about
“Civic Duty?”Look it up.
The commute from Evanston is only about 80 miles. One may consider if the
transportation costs and superior education are cheaper than the school fees.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments