I do not get the characterization that Paul Mero, the Sutherland Institute,
other conservatives, the governor, and the attorney general are "defending
traditional marriage." Traditional marriage is not being challenged or put
on trial. There have been no changes in the legal aspects and regulations
governing traditional marriage. It is non-traditional marriage that is, in
effect, being prosecuted.
"... the most influential conservative voice in Utah." Ummmm, there is
at least one conservative voice in Utah more influential than a think tank most
citizens have never heard of. Hint: it's related to this paper.
I will miss his radio commentary. Best of luck Mr. Mero.
I like Paul and I'm sorry to see him go. Best wishes to you for even
greater success in your next endeavor!
This is a clear divergence from the historic practices of this institute.
However, the magnitude of divergence is not entirely clear at this time. As
Rastignac stated when faced with his dilemma, it is best to understand the
mechanism at work before making irrevocable decisions.
Sutherland is a well-funded source of bizarre disinformation. Mr. Mero's
departure can only enhance his resume.
He was ousted...he didn't "step down".
Will it still continue turning out editorial columns on demand?