I was homeschooled and am now a 15-year-old sophmore at BYU. I've adjusted
just fine to college life despite being, on average, 5 years younger than the
general student population. Many in this thread have brought up the
concern that homeschooled children will develop a limited world view or impaired
social skills. This concern is unfounded. Public school can help children
develop social skills because it is a social avenue. Children can develop social
skills by participating in extracurricular activities, friends, church, and
other social avenues besides public school. They can get exposure to other
points of view through those same social avenues and also through the Internet.
Another concern brought up both in the article and in the comments is
that homeschool parents are not qualified to teach, or that homeschooled
children are limited by the knowledge of their parents. So? With the wealth of
knowledge accessible on the Internet and in textbooks. children can learn what
their parents don't know or can't teach on their own. That is the
strength of home education. It allows children to become self-learners.
@ xert. Let's be careful before we decide these homeschooling parents
don't know what they are doing because of a mistake in a sentence on the
comment board. I made one such mistake and I've been kicking myself ever
since because I cannot change it - I recognized it just a moment too late. Such
mistakes happen to all of us. I've seen very knowledgeable people do the
exact same thing - professors, lauded in their field, making spelling errors
once they get to a chalkboard. Are they thus incapable of teaching their own
children? No. I've seen plenty of public school kids and teachers do the
exact same thing. I am certainly willing to forgive the occasional mistake and
not assume the one making the error is foolish and uneducated simply because of
that one instance.
The remarks in the supporting posts and by the parents themselves are telling.
One person, writing in support claims that he "raises my children the way I
what." Hmm. If one were to simply go by the way these parents put sentences
together in their own speech, it's fairly obvious they don't possess
the skills to pass along what limited knowledge they themselves possess.
For those concerned about homeschooling taking only a few hours: We homeschooled
fifteen hours a week and in that time, my children were always far ahead of the
public schools. One reason is that we didn't wait for the teacher to
explain things the children already knew. Once they mastered a subject, we moved
on. We didn't count pep rallies, Disney movies, or Weird Hat Day.However, those fifteen hours were the formal learning times. Homeschooling
homes tend to be education-rich. We had a great deal of informal learning going
on most of the day. Home ec class was unnecessary--we just cooked as part of our
regular life. Trips to museums were family outings, not field trips. We talked
about ancient Egypt over dinner. We played a Middle Ages game during our family
time. Writing stories, poems, and articles was a hobby at our house. The
children had a great deal of time for hobbies and their hobbies led them to
research things. Our real lives were very educational, even though they
weren't held during formal school hours.
My Brother In-Law was home schooled, Now he has been in college for like a lot
of years working on masters and such. He helps teach and he does this and that
and is pretty much a genius career student. He has been to prestigious schools
such as Minnesota, BYU, Arizona State, and on and on. He is really smart. Home
schooling hasn't hurt him at all, or his sister either.
Why are our children falling so far behind?Many start in daycares as
early as INFANTS! Even more start in daycares as toddlers! Almost all start in
kindergarten's at age 6 (still too young). What are these places missing?
Parents! These poor children arrive in these places as early as 7AM and leave as
late as 6PM. It's so sad. Many are driven through the Mcdonalds drive
through for dinner if they are lucky, and then get maybe 2 hours tops with Mom
or Dad before having to go to bed and repeat the same thing the next day,
summers included.These places are where most all of our children are
being raised. It's survival of the fittest, toughest, most sociable.
Learning? Just street smarts. It's so sad. They are holding tanks, not
places of individual love and attention.What they need is a loving
home where at least one loving parent nurtures them and teaches them. I know, I
know, parents can't afford to raise their own kids. They both have to work.
But I don't accept that anymore. You choose to have a child. You should
also choose to raise them. Figure it out.
Walk into any public high school right now and what you will see is armed cops
and countless kids goofing off. They are actually more like public prisons than
places of learning. Huge brick buildings with armed cops to keep kids from
leaving and break up fights. More time is spent actually trying to call roll and
contain everybody than actual instruction. Teachers are trying to keep control
of 50 plus kids coming and going during the course of a class period, half of
them asleep on the desk, the other half texting on the phone. It's a
madhouse.The public school system is a new thing. It's not like
its been around forever. And new does not make it right. A loving parent with a
half a brain can teach a child far more than a child will ever learn in the
public school setting. As long as these home schooled kids are getting extra
curricular opportunities with friends, such as (sports, arts, music, clubs) I
think its much better than the local prison.
I want to put a plug in for homeschool. I was older - in 8th grade - when I
started homeschooling because I was bored out of my mind at public school. My
mom said I could homeschooling if I was disciplined and taught myself. So I did.
I had taught myself math from algebra and geometry to calculus by the time I was
in 10th grade and had the satisfaction of truly understanding math for the first
time. It was wonderful to take charge of my own education. How did it turn out?
I scored high on the ACT, received great scholarships to a fantastic private
school (Hillsdale College), and ended up with a masters. I believe in
homeschooling. It was what I needed to excel.
@Steve Cottrell. You are absolutely right that the boy finishing school in three
hours should do more. At least double. It is also true from my personal
experience (I did public and home school at various times) that usually, so
little is covered in a public school that I could easily have finished all I
learned in a typical public school in three hours. That is how it was at my
school at least. If that boy is capable of doing the work in three hours, he
ought to push himself more and get ahead, as most homeschoolers I know did.
IS the article well-balanced? It initially appears so. However, all six
persons interviewed here share the same reason for homeschooling, the belief
that public schools are teaching values contrary to their own. The article makes
just one brief statement hinting at other motivations, "Families leave
public schooling for a variety of reasons."I do know many
homeschooling families who believe that, but I know many others homeschooling
for other reasons. Many homeschool, as we do, because one or more of their
children has a special need not well accommodated at school.We also
homeschool because the strict attendance rules imposed by public schools would
keep us from taking our children out into the world to meet a true diversity of
people, of all ages and cultures, in other states and countries, and not just 29
other kids born within 365 days of themselves, and living less than three miles
from us.Likewise, the homeschoolers we know don't keep their
kids isolated at home. We get the book-work done quickly and use the extra time
we gain to go out into the community to take classes, visit museums, volunteer
To those suggesting the homeschoolers should be tested: please remember that
standardized tests do not measure how well one was educated--they only measure
how well people take tests. True education cannot be measured with a multiple
choice question taken out of context. We avoided those tests, but I did have my
children tested at public schools prior to starting fifth grade. These tests
were one-on-one with a professional who could ask the children to explain the
thought processes behind their answers. They were always far, far ahead of their
peers, reading at a post-graduate level. However, one year we decided to prepare
for a possible standardized test and gave up a few weeks in. Wasted hours of
learning trivia upset us all. We preferred to actually think in our educations,
not learn to recognize the right answers from a list--or even to only focus on
things that had right answers. While some homeschooled children may end up not
reading or writing well, many public school children do as well. I am an
editor--I can assure you few people write well.
Wow, some of the comments make me wonder! Many are calling for the
standardization testing of homeschooled students but I am willing to bet the
same dislike common core... Standardization testing does what again? Is it a
fair representation of what a child knows or does not know? Second,
subjecting your kids to the wonderful joys of JR High as a - good for them-
experience is crazy. Public schools have become a place where mediocrity is
"the standard", full of immorality where good is shadowed by the
overwhelming negativity in classes. Teachers who have the passion for teaching
and are wonderful teachers are so burdened by the bureaucracy and of teaching to
the test there is little time to do imaginative and creative lessons. Just get
through the material - teach them to pass the test so the ratings allow them to
keep employment. I feel for them.All of us can think of a child from our
childhood that was awkward and out of place that was homeschooled. BUT with the
resources available to us today, that is just not the same!Yes,
homeschooling is wonderful if done correctly, can go horribly wrong if not, but
same with PARENTING.
I also had some apathetic ones. I spent a depressing amount of time in middle
school and high school doing word searches, or watching "historical"
films like Spartacus and the Princess Bride. And when you add the other
problems with public education (such as violence, bullying, drug and alcohol
abuse, sexual promiscuity), I think that as a parent, I want my children to have
a better experience than I received from the public education system. I am proud to say I am a home school parent. Our children work hard, and they
love to learn. We can tailor their curriculum to them as individuals. They can
learn at their own pace. They learn reading, writing, math, science, history,
art and music. They also learn topics that the public school system tends to
pass over (like the founding of the American republic). They learn in an
environment that fosters their spiritual and emotional growth instead of tearing
it down. I resist the idea that the State should come to our home
to "check up" on us instead of checking up on, let's say, the
number of functionally illiterate students who graduate from high school.
This article is nothing more than an opinion piece. The facts are that home
school kids not only do better in colllege, are more likely to get a college
degree, but are more socially adjusted than their public educated peers. See
"Homeschooled Students Well-Prepared for College, Study Finds" in the
Huffington Post.As for teachers in Utah being conservative, that is
false. The older teachers can be conservative, but the teachers teachers
younger than 40 are very liberall. I even have had one tell me that they would
be willing to give up freedom for security.
Even with the very best teachers, children won't get a good education if
the teacher has 20+ kids in the class with a wide spread of abilities. What
happens is that the teacher "teaches to the middle" and the kids who
are bright or who have learning difficulties don't receive the special
attention they need. This is one of the advantages of home schooling, each child
gets individualized instruction.Regarding the social aspect, the
home schooled children in our neighborhood integrate very well with their peers
in other youth groups (church, teams, etc.). I don't see a difference in
@Steve Cottrell, why is it anyone's business how a parent educates their
children at home? Why should we make the state play policeman and force families
to educate their children in the way "we collectively" decide children
should be educated. There are many, many educational paths and we should give
families the freedom to pursue those paths as they see fit for their children.
Really??? - I'm quoting my daughter from her own observations. Most of her
peers are overly dependent on the teacher.As far as world view, most
homeschoolers I know made a point of preparing their child for all kinds of
views. In my own teaching, I'd present all the views I knew about (and
that included online research). We'd talk about each one, why people
believed the various ones, what I thought, and respect for the ones I
didn't agree with. On science, we'd talk about how theories developed
over the years, what the current understanding was, and how they might change in
the future. It's not rare - it's common. That kind of teaching is
the goal, not an accident.
While I believe a good home school program can be better education than public
classrooms, what is missing is Diversity. When will the children, isolated at
homes and neighborhoods of the same color, economics, and religion, be able to
interact and work across different cultural values? How will they perceive
another persons different story of life and values, if all they ever did was
stay in two influential places while growing up?
>"Riddle said home-schooled children are at a disadvantage when it comes
to the developing qualitative or "soft" skills — like working with
others to reach a consensus — that a potential employer expects of their
staff."Has this person ever lived in a family with siblings?
Working to reach a consensus is a regular thing.
@Demisana,It's great that your daughter knows how to teach
herself, but please don't continue fooling yourself into believing that her
peers who go through the public school system cannot. Many children in the
public school system learn independence and have the self motivation to learn on
their own. The one thing I believe a public school can do better
than any home school can is to teach students to gain a world view. The kids see
and understand that people are different in many ways, and when done properly
they learn tolerance and empathy for those differences. It's a rare
home-school parent who can instill that sort of a worldview for their children
when they rarely leave the confines of their home or associate with a variety of
I tried to visualize myself as a child being home schooled. It made me giggle.
Then I visualized my life without Mrs. Pinnock, my 3rd grade teacher, Mr.
Tak, my fifth grade teacher, my remarkable choral teachers and history teachers
and debate teachers and French teachers, and I cannot conceive of my life
without them. Being homeschooled would have been a desert indeed. At least
Even if parents send their children to a school outside the home, they should
also be "homeschooling". Teachers will concur that it's clearly
evident which children are worked with at home. Full-time homeschooling seems
to be misunderstood as a method. It's just a place. The methods are
countless.And, interestingly enough, uneducated and intolerant comments
are being made on both sides of this dialogue.
Home schooling is appropriate when it's goal is appropriate. Taking a child
out of a school because you don't agree with a particular teaching point
(i.e., gay marriage or evolution) to teach hatred of your fellow man (gays) or
pass off ridiculous talking points (Jesus walked with dinosaurs or Earth was
created 6,000 years ago) is harmful to impressionable children and is tantamount
to child abuse. Leave the teaching to the qualified. Leave the
prosetylizing to the Church.
I homeschooled my kids for several years. The oldest had Asperger's and
was reading at a 4th grade level prior to kindergarten. He was the reason we
started, but I loved homeschooling for many reasons. Maybe I didn't have
classroom management skills or the latest pedagogical theories under my belt,
but I knew my kids. I spent massive amounts of time studying various curriculum
choices and reading reviews, to see what would be the best fit for my kids, my
budget and me. Today, the oldest graduated from a public charter school with a
3.47 GPA, and is currently employed and successful. His sister has had a 4.0
since 7th grade and another charter, and will graduate a year early from the
same high school, heading to BYU with all the scholarships we can round up. Her
opinion of home school was that it taught her independence and maturity her
classmates sorely lack. She can teach herself, they can't.
I've been very impressed with so many of the home schooled children. I
think it is sad that our schools can't do a better job of teaching our
children and keeping them safe from bullying and the things that make it
necessary for families to do home schooling. I worked in a school district for
a while and found that the teachers and leaders have their hands tied in doing a
job they know would be much more efficient.
Please don't trash the public school teachers since it is someone up the
line who determines what they teach. Whenever one talks about education, a good
education must have some sort of a certification tied to it. There are so many
who are drop outs from education who educated themselves and succeeded to the
highest levels. One parent I know home schooled until the 11th grade and then
sent her children to public school to learn social skills. They have all
succeeded including a daughter going to the Miss America Pageant. It all proves
that education in whatever form is good.
That's so great. These parents can avoid any of those uncomfortable
discussions about how science or politics go against their beliefs by just not
exposing their children to any ideas they might disagree with. Fabulous!
When the public schools are no longer dedicated to truth, the benefits of an
experienced teacher are far outweighed by a loving parent.
Homeschooling may have some benefits but the reason to homeschool may be lacking
in some of the process. If you tell your school children that you teach them at
home because public schools are fraught with dangers such as socialist or
government interference, those children will grow up with a view that may not be
beneficial in society. Social interaction with a variety is also good that may
include friends of all backgrounds, even the rough and tough. Your children can
have an impact on helping other children be better. Sharing beliefs along with
good education can be a blessing for children. There are a lot of good children
in the 536,000 Utah children in public education. Teachers and administrators
are some of the best in the USA. Many are of the primary religion in Utah due to
the population and are very good people as a rule. The legislators have been
influenced over the years to not trust the public school system and try to
undermine the boards and administrators statewide that public schools in Utah
are not good.
@ Steve CUnfortunately, our public school days are not longer because the
children are learning more. They are longer because the children are all at
different levels and teachers must take that into consideration. Also, time is
spent on recess, announcements, getting the children settled, answering
everyone's questions, lunchtime, reading time, and so on. In all
actuality, our public school days could be much shorter. I have tried both
methods of educating my children. Homeschool parents (who do it right) have a
difficult job which I find I would rather not do. Parents on both
sides should be supportive and kind. We are all learners here on earth.
Education is always evolving or we wouldn't have "the newest miracle
solution to education" - Common Core. We are fortunate that the State of
Utah recognizes the right of parents to decide the best way to educate their
I commend parents who can home school their children well. Unfortunately, it is
rare that parents can do alone what good public schools have to offer. The
problem I see is the attitude of many home school parents that their children
are better than anyone else. The article gives a good example when a mother
says she does not want her children to associate with other children other than
those they know and approve of in their neighborhood. Also, the comment by
Mainly Me is also typical of home school parents that public schools are
socialist, godless places of indoctrination. How can attitudes like that make
these children better to function in society as responsible citizens?
Having home-schooled my 7 kids, I can safely say--some people really should not
do it. Not only are those people not up to it, they give the rest of us who are
up to it a bad name.At least, the people interviewed for this
article sound like they're up to it. So congrats, and good luck!Working in the education business with a lot of teachers and a few past or
prospective teachers...as a group, they're not nearly as smart as the union
leaders tell them they are. I have more than one story of teachers phoning me to
say they don't know how to open or read the PDF file I just e-mailed them,
e-mailing to say they can't find any public-domain reading passages on the
subject they got their master's degree in, etc.But yes, I am in
favor of regular testing or portfolios or something to demonstrate the kids have
actually learned something.
@Manly Me:"All that aside, the best reason for home schooling
your kids is to get away from the socialist, godless indoctrination that has
infested public schools."You say that like teachers and public
schools are the only ones who can brainwash kids. Let's face it. There are
plenty of religions groups out there which indoctrinate their children with some
pretty dangerous stuff. Also, Utah is one of the most politically
conservative states in the U.S. and statistically speaking that would mean most
teachers in Utah are politically conservative. I know all but two of my teachers
in Utah who shared their politics were professed Republicans. Wouldn't that
mean that most of the indoctrination which might be taking place would be to
instill conservative viewpoints? I think it best we admit some
people (but not all) are capable home school teachers, and some students (but
not all) might actually benefit from home schooling. We should also admit that
some (but not all) teachers should move on to different professions.
My compliments to Mr. Wood on a well balanced article on a controversial
subject. Good juxtaposition of contrasting ideas. Personal background- I started
lst grade in a one room public school, with one teacher attempting to teach six
different grades with fifty students in the room. How did I ever get my Ph.D.?
You can also test children at public schools as to how well they are doing. If
t hey are not succeeding, of course, there may not ultimateely be much that can
be done about it. Perhaps such children should be sent home to see if they will
do better there.
I homeschooled my own children for 8 years, and am now teaching at a charter
high school where we see many homeschooled students come in, either part time,
or to finish high school in a classroom setting. Homeschooling is great! I loved
it when I was homeschooling with my own children, and see many wonderful and
well adjusted students, who were homeschooled, come through my classes. My hat
is off to the wonderful parents who decide to educate their own children at
home, and am so grateful for the fantastic resources that are available through
the community, for those that choose to do so.
The universities are full of professors who have never been taught how to teach.
I have been on high school evaluation teams and have seen teachers write a
reading assignment on the board then sit down and read a paperback. My wife had
a math teacher who wrote the assignment on the board and left the classroom,
every day. Thankfully, that kind of "teaching" is rare. On the other
side, there are many great public and private school teachers. The problem
remains that there are too many teachers at all levels and all classroom
settings that are not great or good teachers. Parents are ultimately responsible
for their children's education and environment. The results can be
tremendous to devastating.
Like any job, some people are good at home-schooling, some are terrible at it.
"I am glad my kids are not associating with other kids their age except for
those that are in our general neighborhood that I approve of," she said.
"Especially when my older two were in school, they didn’t know how to
say ‘no,’ and ‘that’s not right.’ Even though I
had taught them, they didn’t know when they were hearing jokes that
weren’t appropriate."I personally think that children must
be taught to be able to choose their friends wisely and most of all. to say no
by themselves. A parent cannot be with the child 24 hours. Yes, they will make
mistakes but they are supposed to learn when they are little to deal with peer
pressure, not when they are adults. Our father in heaven sent us here as little
children knowing we will not be perfect and we will learn from our mistakes. As
parents, we cannot be that overprotective. Ia she going to chose their spouse
I heard stories that some home schooled children don't learn to read at the
same time time as their peers in public schools, but they learn later when they
are ready too. Home schooling is a great option because the individual child can
learn subjects as he likes, and at the rate he wants to. Let different people
The public school principle encouraged me to start homeschooling because my
children were too advanced and were passionate learners. District rules
prevented him from teaching my children at the level they wanted to be taught.
When they decided to take a few public school classes later, I looked at the
textbook and saw it said Columbus proved the world was round. I cringed, hoping
the teacher knew better. We skipped the error-ridden textbooks and used real
books by professional scholars. The principal at that school asked how I taught
them to write so well and then admitted they couldn't use that method in
school due to time. My children learned not one point of view, but many. We
studied all sides of each issue. I had no political agenda, unlike the schools.
We focused on learning life-long independent scholar skills and they all did
very well in college, with the youngest currently in law school. They were, in
fact, puzzled that their peers resented learning in college; they loved it.
They'd been taught to learn for the joy of it, not for an artificial test.
I home schooled several of my children. But that doesn't mean I taught
them everything. When I couldn't teach them I found someone who could.
These days there are so many more online resources than ever before. The ones
that have the most home schooling have gotten scholarships to college. Several
of my family members are public school teachers. Kids learn just as many bad
things in public school as they do good things. I have seen many more great
kids come from home schooling than not. I have only seen a few bad situations.
Home schooling, statistically, ROCKS.
"Just being among different people with different points of view, I think,
is a good thing," she said. "I think a lot of parents that home-school
like the fact that they have more control over the message that their kids
receive, but there’s also something to be said for being exposed to
different ways of thinking."If this is what students learn at
home, fantastic. Too often it seems it's this: "I am glad my kids are
not associating with other kids their age except for those that are in our
general neighborhood that I approve of," she said.The wisest
people who have ever lived all share a variation of this: the answer to the
world's problems is learning to tolerate and even celebrate our
differences, not trying to achieve sameness, which is impossible.
If there are object public school teachers they are rare. Public school teachers
think they are giving an objective view of a child that parents can't see.
More likely than not the real problem is that if a student doesn't fit into
the current teaching style fad, there must be something wrong with the student,
because it can't be the teaching style, or the teacher. Also, many teachers
have a cause and they think they are doing the world a favor by using their
position to spread the message. There doesn't need to be any science behind
it. Some of the things teachers have taught my children are weirder than many
superstitions. A teacher today probably would never teach that breaking a mirror
will actually deliver 7 year of bad luck, but they have no problem teaching that
releasing a helium balloon will kill a sea turtle, or if you drive an SUV you
are killing the world, and if you flush the toilet we will all die of
dehydration. Exaggeration is not objective. Seeing students through a narrow set
of criteria is not objective, it is narrow minded. Saying only certified
teachers can teach is ridiculous.
@ Steve- I am a public school teacher, and believe it or not, most public school
children only get around 3 to 4 hours of education a day. 3-4 Hours of
instruction on the core subjects, plus 1 hour of recess per day, plus library,
P.E., Art, Computer Lab, etc. You get the picture....One advantage a
home-schooler has that a public ed child doesn't have is the full attention
of the teacher! There is a lot of wait time these days for behavior and large
class sizes. I had my class do a math problem with wait time and if we only
wasted 10 minutes per day it would be 1800 minutes per year, or roughly 30 hours
of class time a school year. Unfortunately, there is a lot more wasted time at
school than you would think! As a mother and a teacher, I can see
some advantages to home-schooling if done well. I have seen both. I agree;
however, that there should be some type of assessment done for homeschooled
children to ensure that they are getting an appropriate education. This would
ensure that those at home are being taught well.
@Steve The reason parents don't need more time to teach is that
studies have shown that the total instruction time a child gets in a public
school brainwashing session is only 3-4 hours a day The rest of the time is
spent repeating instructions, taking roll, and generally going to the pace of
the slowest child. In CA where I home schooled my kids, I was only required to
do 4 hours of instruction a day. My kids consistently placed in the higher
scoring percentages when tested through the state.All that aside,
the best reason for home schooling your kids is to get away from the socialist,
godless indoctrination that has infested public schools.
"Just because someone goes to college and attends and studies history, what
they did to study history was to read lots of books," she said. "Well
guess what? You can read lots of books about history and be able to teach
history just fine. Or math, or whatever."This makes my heart
hurt. Reading books about math does not qualify you to teach math... Being able
to read in general does not qualify you to teach. I believe that home schooling
is the best choice for some kids and families but saying things like this does a
disservice to the teaching profession and home schooling in general. My degrees
in education required a lot more than just reading books, and I am still
required to do more than read books as a practicing teacher for ongoing
professional development. And I agree with Steve above: a child in 5th grade
should be spending 3 hours just on reading, writing, and math practice each day.
Of course he can whip through a worksheet faster than that, but how much is he
Good the more kids we can get to home school, the less crowded our schools will
be. I'm all for it if the parent is capable. I've seen some
excellent kids come from home schooling. Unfortunately they are the exception
to the rule. Someone needs to check up on these kids once in a while and make
sure they are achieving the appropriate benchmarks for their age.
That is an interesting set of names those kids have. Parents need to realize
that their children will be having to explain their name to their teacher over
and over again unless they are homeschooled all the way through college.
It's absolutely amazing how teachers think the world revolves around them.
Keep your kids out of school long enough for them to think with the values
you've taught them, and recognize the values that you don't. I raise
my kids the way I what. I don't care if the governmental education system
doesn't like it.
I extend my commendations to home schooling parents. I have taught school in
public schools and private schools, and I see definite advantages to good home
schooling that outweigh any disadvantages. Of course there will be some
negatives to home schooling, but if the parents are dedicated to the task, their
children are very fortunate.
If the first student cited can finish his school work in 3 hours, how much
education is he getting?Home school parents usually feel their
children have an education as good as, or better, than that available in public
schools. I wonder if they participated in testing programs that the state
requires of public school students if that would be substantiated. There is
no requirement that the home schooled students take any of the state required
testing in Utah. Perhaps there should be.