Comments about ‘Lawmakers question warrant served on former Attorney General Mark Shurtleff’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, June 18 2014 11:25 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
SharpHooks
Sandy, UT

I think he really overcooked his story.
If he wasn't involved in activities that warranted federal investigation, none of this would ever have happened.
I have a hard time believing anything he says.
Tough for you, Mark.
Stop breaking the law.

pleblian
salt lake city, utah

"Look away from there!...Look over here! Over here!" he says.

This is classic "changing the story" tactic.

But the story will revert to Shurtleff himself in due time, when the investigation concludes with an indictment, charges or no action.

Until then, it appears Mr. Shurtleff will parade his minor daughter, and her innocence, in front of cameras in public proceedings as a pretty distraction from the real issues.

cocosweet
Sandy, UT

Just being treated like many alleged criminals. Wonder how many other families had the same treatment when Shurtleff was in control of their lives? Don't like the treatment? Change the policies and procedures (some of which I imagined he approved of).

Brave Sir Robin
San Diego, CA

"'They violated the law, that's what they did,' Shurtleff said outside the hearing."

Methinks Mr. Shurtleff is confused about who broke the law. The reason they entered your house with a warrant, Mark, is because YOU broke the law.

SharpHooks
Sandy, UT

He does business with the likes of Jeremy Johnson-even hangs out at his country club villa and racks up a tab he doesn't cover--assists Swallow in creating false business entities through which to channel illegal campaign funds---has a FIXER--What AG does THAT?

As much as I don't care for Swallow, he hasn't said word ONE about any of this.
Shurtleff continues to draw attention to himself, and none of it is good.
Were I his lawyer--I would have advise him to keep quiet and stay the heck away from any media.

Henry Drummond
San Jose, CA

I wonder if this had been our daughter if we wouldn't have reacted the same way.

Fitness Freak
Salt Lake City, UT

No sympathy from me.

Shurtleff's a lawyer. NO DOUBT he would have filed a lawsuit by now had the warrant been served improperly. Doubtful there's ANYTHING to what he says.

Just trying to manipulate both the media and the legislature - as always.

Aggie238
Logan, UT

I'm having a hard time feeling sorry for a guy who presumably has condoned and given approval for LEAs to use the very same extreme and unnecessary tactics he is decrying. That said, the good thing may be that something could actually be done to reign in these Rambo wannabe cops who prey on those not fortunate enough to have any power to make them answer for their crimes against human dignity.

EJM
Herriman, UT

I'm sorry but Mr. Shurtleff gets no sympathy from here. These same type of tactics are used across the board by police agencies nationwide. Standard operating procedures. Funny how when the shoe is on the other foot that people like him cry the loudest.

FT
salt lake city, UT

Sounds like another Clive Bundy story complaining about a heavy handed goverment out of control.

Noodlekaboodle
Poplar Grove, UT

How does Mr Shurtleff know this at all? How can he say the police used "Dirty Harry" tactics, when he wasn't even there when his house was raided.

Commenter88
Salt Lake City, Utah

Isn't "Schadenfreude for Shurtleff" an old song title?

Grover
Salt Lake City, UT

Two points: 1. The DNews keeps publishing the same picture of the outside of the house. None of the people in the picture are wearing body armor and only one is uniformed (presumably carrying a weapon). 2. In an era when every traffic stop is on camera, can it be that there are not video of the incident?

megaman
Reston, VA

What a complete failure on the part of law enforcement. No matter whether Shurtleff is guilty, these kind of tactics are completely unnecessary. Please find a more appropriate use for your guns.

Understands Math
Lacey, WA

When in doubt, claim to be a victim.

GaryO
Virginia Beach, VA

I really doubt that anyone pointed a gun at his daughter.

The officers were not expecting armed resistance in the house, so why would they point a gun at his daughter?

It's not like they were busting into a crack house or something.

I agree with sharphooks. Shurtleff overcooked his story, and it may be a little too overcooked . . . Unsuitable for consumption.

It doesn't ring true at all.

Obama10
SYRACUSE, UT

Isn't it standard operating procedure when entering a house, that police have people put their hands up and point their guns at them not knowing what they would do? Did he expect the FBI to ring the doorbell and ask her nicely? That may have worked in this case. I am sure she is a nice girl, but unfortunately police can't distinguish between good and bad. Everyone needs to be treated the same for the protection of the police. Now, there is an argument to be had about the over-militarization of our local police, but that is for a different time.

Instereo
Eureka, UT

How many homes were invaded just like he said his was when he was attorney general. I imagine that some of them were innocent just like he's claiming he is but then some were also guilty. Isn't it the GOP that constantly calls for law enforcement, zero tolerance, three strikes your out, tougher laws on criminals, etc. etc. He was part of the government for a long time that not only put up and tolerated this kind of behavior but actually put it in place.

one old man
Ogden, UT

Sob, sob. Sniffle, sniffle. Whimper, whimper. Whine, whine.

Now let's get back to the investigation to find out what really happened between Shurtleff, Swallow, Johnson and all the others in this mess.

Smokin' Joe
ALTURAS, CA

I'm sympathetic to Shurtleff's complaint. Was it really necessary to train a firearm and laser on an unarmed 17 year old girl? Necessary to leave his house trashed? This wasn't a warrant served on a meth lab. It was served on the former Attorney General. Are such aggressive (dare I say "police state") tactics always necessary? Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Seems law enforcement could learn from that little vignette of wisdom.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments