Published: Wednesday, June 11 2014 12:00 a.m. MDT
The problems with the VA are based on lack of access. Those who get care like
it. We need more doctors and nurses for the VA and that's going to require
Recently, republicans demanded for the head of the VA to be held accountable and
fired.So doesn't it make sense to hold those in the House who
refuse to finance the VA accountable too? They've been trying to privatize
it for years by underfunding it. Now, we have reports that many good men have
died due to the republicans' games.Can we finally fire folks
like Chaffetz? He needs to be held accountable for cutting embassy funding and
bragging about it. And cutting VA funding. He can't keep cutting vital
government services which oftentimes leads to destruction for many Americans and
still have a job.
The problems with the VA are the same problems faced by every government program
that takes away the opportunity for private enterprise to profit from peoples
needs. If the VA services for veterans are shifted to private
enterprise the cost to the veteran or the taxpayer will increase tenfold.
I haven't heard of any one in the VA hospital getting any boniness like the
Freddy May Freddy Mac for doing a good job. Wow, weight a minute didn't
that Government program crash the economy.
Nice letter Rod. I'm glad you're being taken care of by the VA. You
deserve it. And I'm certain the majority of those who work for the VA are
dedicated to serving as many as they can. Letters like yours are the start of a
process to better support the organization and the people who work there.
Thanks for writing.
The VA has problems no doubt. It always has, and probably always will.
Because the problem is that there's large need... and limited resources.
So those resources need to be rationed or stretched. It's the same
problem any government run healthcare system would have (and does have in other
countries that have government run healthcare systems).I suspect
that people with big problems (like kidney transplants and heart bypasses) get a
lot of attention (they have to... or they would die). But the people who fall
between the cracks are the people with NON-life-threatening problems
(depression, minor illnesses, substance abuse problems, family problems, PTSD,
etc)... can wait... and they do.They wait, and they wait, and they
wait....And it's reported to be the same in Canada and the UK
(from people I know who live there).They get excellent care for life
threatening stuff... but the mundane stuff... has to wait, and wait and wait...
But but but...The VA is part of der guvmint and needs to be
privatized. That's what the Koch bros propaganda and talking box says. And
we all know der private sector does everything better! I hate socialism! Now
keep your guvmint hands off my Medicare and keep my Social Security checks
That is the problem. The VA can deliver satisfactory care but often it does not.
From General Motors to the VA, large organizations have the primary objective of
preserving themselves. Government, with the civil service guarantees of life
time jobs, is particularly prone to under performance. At the VA the best way to
get rid of incompetent employees is to recommend they be promoted to another
department. That is why the new VA McCain-Sanders bill will allow people to be
fired for incompetence.
@ HemlockThe VA's problem doesn't come from the desire to
preserve itself. It comes from a lack of funding. It can't increase prices
like oil companies constantly do. It can't cut people or mess with
peoples' benefits like insurance companies do. It can't outsource to
china like other companies do.So when folks from Congress refuse to
allocate necessary funds to the VA, people will be hurt.We could
have funded the VA for centuries with the money wasted on Bush's 2 wars,
tax breaks for the wealthy, and bank bailouts.Will we the people
support more of the same? Or will we vote these obstructionist bums out? Guess
we'll find out in November!
Re: "We could have funded the VA for centuries with the money wasted on
Bush's 2 wars, tax breaks for the wealthy, and bank bailouts."True, but the sums you reference are chump-change, compared to all Democrat
tax-and-spend, vote-buying scams.
Somehow I doubt the Bush administration acknowledged a need to increase VA
funding when it committed us to two wars. It didn't even increase funding
to finance the wars themselves, let alone their aftermath. Nor did it foresee
the need to increase VA funding just to handle the increasing medical needs of
aging veterans from WWII, Korea, and Vietnam. And even if Obama had pushed to
increase VA funding, it would have been a futile exercise so long as the
Republicans could obstruct it. Why are we now surprised that the chickens have
come home to roost?
@Curmudgeon,Most of the patients at VA hospitals (at least in Utah and
Arizona) are not Afganistan Vets. They are WWII Vets and Vietnam Vets. And
they aren't being treated for bullet holes or traumatic injuries... they
are being treated for CPOD, kidney problems, heart problems, Alzheimer's,
etc (just like the aging population in any other hospital). They
do get SOME traumatic injuries from the battlefield... but that's FAR from
the majority of the care they provide.The VA needs funding
increases. But they also need to learn to be more efficient (as ALL Hospitals
are having to learn to be more efficient and deliver care in different ways now
days).You can try to blame it all on Bush... or all on
Republicans... but it was a problem even when I was there in the early 80's
(when Carter was President). And it will probably ALWAYS be a problem in a
system where they deliver care using the model the DMV and other government only
distribution systems use (customer doesn't matter, rationing by waiting in
lines, and no motivation to improve service... where else they gonna go?).
2 Bits:As reported by the International Business Times in November,
2013:"All that can be said with any certainty is that as of last
December more than 900,000 service men and women had been treated at Department
of Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics since returning from war zones in Iraq
and Afghanistan, and that the monthly rate of new patients to these facilities
as of the end of 2012 was around 10,000."We may not see so many
in UT and AZ VA hospitals, but overall, it is a heavy strain on the VA system,
which should not be downplayed as you have done.And yes, I do lay
blame for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars at the feet of the Bush administration.
What I wonder is why do we still have VA hospitals? Couldn't the same
thing be done at the local hospitals? I could understand the need 20 years ago
or more when electronic records were not available, but what is the point of the
VA hospitals now?I can go to the UofU hospital and get the same
treatments and care that are available at the VA hospital that is a mile
away.Rather than throwing more money at the VA system, why not
convert to a system that pays for private insurance for the veterans?
@CurmudgeonSo.. who do you blame for the problems the VA had in the
1980's??? They were the same problems. And Bush wasn't around to
blame back then!Did you blame Carter??? He was President then!
A letter from a vet who knows about the problem and blames no one turns into a
slugfest of finger pointing about who is to blame. That game is much easier than
fixing the problem i.e. giving them more resources (read: taxes) to fix the
problem. Ok, let's see how many are ready to pay the bill rather than blow
hot air about a real problem.PS. How about selling those ribbons
everyone had 10 or 12 years ago that said: "Support our Troops"? Now
they could say: "Raise My Taxes To Support Our Troops!"
@The Real Maverick"We could have funded the VA for centuries with the
money wasted on Bush's 2 wars, tax breaks for the wealthy, and bank
bailouts."Or we could just reduce the need for more funding for
the VA by just not galivanting around the Middle East for a dozen years with the
side effect of making more veterans who need care.
@2bits "who do you blame for the problems the VA had in the
1980's??? They were the same problems. "I don't think
it's an administration specific issue either then or now. I think the
problem is something more fundamental. The longest wars in American history are
Afghanistan and Vietnam. There's a massive spike in people needing veterans
care after we've gone through something that created a lot more veterans
needing care. We have been unable to factor in wars into the VA funding equation
and seem to be woefully short.
2 Bits:I was not then and am not now a fan of Jimmy Carter, but at
least he did not exacerbate the problems with the VA by entering into massive
military actions that created hundreds of thousands of wounded vets, like Bush
did. I never said that the sole reason the VA has problems is because of war
casualties, but you have to admit that whatever other problems it has, adding
that many wounded warriors puts a strain on the system.
The reason we have the military is to protect the commercial interests of the
people, that even includes you and me. That protection includes but is not
limited to the following:War. Wars are the ultimate competition of
businessmen. They are waged to protect or gain an economic advantage over
foreign competitors. Foreign aid. Used to buy the friendship of foreign
governments to the advantage of American businessmen. Mostly it is used to
oppress the people of that country.American bases. Used to advertise the
American presence and reward the local business.Foreign bases. Used to
advertise the American presence and reward the local business.Arms
manufacture. Used to create profits for businessmen.Etc. Etc. Etc. All of the profit making aspects of the military come from the active
military. Veterans are the left over, worn out and useless remnants who's
only value is in media stories and charities. Mostly the Medical industry
has be left out of the military gravy train but if they can take over the
veterans medical ....
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments