Comments about ‘Jay Evensen: School nutrition? Why not emphasize physical fitness instead?’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, May 29 2014 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Burke, VA

“Who could argue? Except that at no time did she mention costs, which is, of course, the point of the proposal”.(proposed legislation to allow states to opt out of the nutrition requirements).

And there you have it - the bottom line of every argument. How much will it cost?

“Her “Let’s move!” campaign is commendable, but it doesn't command anywhere near the resources of the nutrition program.”

Well, duh! If I have an exercise program for my family that includes a daily walk and more vigorous training three times a week, how will the cost of that program compare to the family’s weekly grocery bill?

Yes, the First Lady should be commended for her “Let’s Move!” program and she should also be allowed to use her position as a mother who is married to the president to call attention to anytime Congress tries to shortchange the health of nation's children.

Virginia Beach, VA

" School nutrition? Why not emphasize physical fitness instead?"

Why not both?

The school lunch program was established in 1948 because it was found to be necessary for the National Defense.

It was a direct response to the millions of children who had experienced malnutrition during the Great Depression that left them unfit for military service when they tried to enlist during World War II.

Good nutrition makes good sense. And so does exercise.

When I was a kid, the Presidents Council on physical fitness, was a big deal. Guidelines had been established for minimum fitness requirements, and yes we had at three recesses a day when we could run around as much as we wanted. I couldn't have imagined a day without recess.

I feel sorry for kids today, who do not have that opportunity.

The "President's Council on Physical Fitness" still exists, but you hardly ever hear about it. "Conservatives" would probably get upset if is was promoted. They would probably accuse Obama of trying to systematically brainwash their children.

That's the difference between now an then. Extremists like the John Birchers, were dismissed as irrelevant. Now they are mainstream in the Red States.

Sioux City, IA

I also remember a time when kids were allowed to go out to the playground essentially 3 times during the school day. Morning and afternoon recess and noon recess after you ate. We played basketball, softball, dodgeball, swung on swings, climbed on jungle gyms, jumped rope, etc.
Yes we still had some kids who were overweight but they were getting some exercise also. 90+ kids on a 150' x 250' lot and very few injuries required more than a Band-Aid.

Midwest Mom
Soldiers Grove, WI

The first lady advocated better nutrition and growing our own vegetables. For that she has been highly criticized. I don't remember Laura Bush being criticized for encouraging reading over emphasizing math.

Criticize the Obamas where they deserve, but let's be honest that this attack is purely political and frequently racist. How? It's the disproportionate vitriol aimed at a stay-at-home mother. The only difference between her and previous first ladies is that she is black.

Cottonwood Heights, UT

Plain and simple junk food might be cheaper but should it be a staple in a school lunch. If our kids have a diet problem, and many do, why reinforce that.

Centerville, UT

Midwest Mom,

Racisms? Really?

There is no evidence that the criticisms directed towards the Obamas is racist. Rather, the criticisms are based upon differing philosophies and politics.

But the racist charge is very predictable. It is thrown out there anytime traction is needed by the Democratic party.

Criticism for the cost of school lunch programs is racist? Hardly.

Now, to be honest, I commend Mrs. Obama for highlighting the obesity problem in America and I support her efforts. Nutrition and exercise are both needed and should be emphasized.

There, I'm a white, male, Republican and I support Mrs. Obama in this. Hardly racist.

Twin Lights
Louisville, KY

Both not just one.

Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT

There isn't big money in focusing on allowing kids to play sports. That is all it boils down to. Big money, big donors.

If you don't have deep pockets to sue, then it's not an issue. For example the NAACP focuses on racist issues in the US when there is a deep pocket (ie police, politicians, businesses etc). I have yet to hear them lament about racism in foreign lands, the slaughter of pigmies in Africa etc. There is no money to be had over there.

If the schools had private gyms and students were getting fat, then the gym would be sued for having fat kids around it. Rather than going after the parents the school and leaders that take away gym time.

Poplar Grove, UT

"If a school loses money on lunches for six months in a row, something is wrong."
Why? Maybe I missed something here, but I didn't realize that my childs elementary school needed to make a profit. I always thought it was about teaching kids......

Springville, UT

Where have you been? Mrs. Obama has been emphasizing nutrition AND exercise - BOTH! By the way, experts tell us that nutrition plays a far bigger role in weight loss than does exercise. By this, no one is saying don't exercise, not at all. Both nutrition and exercise are critically important to good health and proper weight. But please, don't distort what Mrs. Obama is trying to accomplish. In fact, why don't you push our local school districts to give more emphasis to PE. Not more on competitive sports, on various physical activities, both in school and to develop skills and interest in life long activities. Football doesn't count.


Yes. Let's blame kids not exercising on Mrs. Obama. Do you know the number one class our high school kids are taking on line? Fitness for Life - the only required physical education class required to graduate.

Perhaps the State should change that loophole?

Brave Sir Robin
San Diego, CA

@Midwest Mom

I did a search on this page and you are the first person to post the words "racist" and "black". Why do you feel the need to defend against an attack that never happened?

Cedar Hills, UT

why not just get government out of peoples lives and leave them alone!!!

Hayden, ID

@ Patriot. Because liberals think the rest of us are stupid and just can't make it without them forcing us to do what's best for us, according to them!

Mchenry, IL

I think schools asked for it with pop and candy machines and Cheetos as part of the sold lunch before action was taken.

Schools should not have gyms. They should have fitness centers like adults go to.

Fitness for Life isn't physical activity class. There are not many online classes and students would rather leave their schedule open for other things like math and science and language. PE is too popular. You can't get 2000 into the gym daily for activity. I think schools should move away from gyms and have fitness centers instead. In house track. Cycle class rooms.

San Diego, CA

If a school loses money on lunches for six months in a row, something is wrong. And there is evidence a few districts are doing just that. There is indeed no such thing as a free school lunch.

You can’t exercise your way out of a potato chip bag and a can of high fructose corn syrup soda. It’s too bad that it costs money to store fresh produce but I wonder what is more expensive: a lifetime of diabetes drugs and medical care or a refrigerator to store fresh produce.

I finished the 10-day challenge to eliminate sugar and artificial sweeteners from my diet. Essentially the challenge is to try for 10 days to eat foods that do not contain any processed sugars or artificial sweeteners (sugar found in natural fruits, vegetables and milk are ok). I’m now past day 20 and was shocked to discover today that carrots taste good. If we can eliminate the junk food from school lunches and replace with fresh produce, maybe school children would discover vegetables taste good too.

Mormon Book Worm
----------, UT

Oh yes, here we go again. As a current student in middle school, I find the "healthy" (but still processed and very greasy) school lunches are, in fact, DISGUSTING, so I've found a loophole.

Enter; home lunches. Lunches that you bring to school in a paper bag that contain whatever goodies you want them to.

Now what? After the changing-school -lunches-to-make -them-"healthy", comes the physical education (which might work), and then schools will find that--wait for it--home lunches contain cookies with high calorie amounts. And then you might be saying bye bye to your yummy cookie.

I just wish that we wouldn't be forced to eat what they tell us to and we could just go back to the simple days.

the truth
Holladay, UT

No matter the good intentions,

no dictatorship is worth it.

Let us us be free to live our lives and pursue our happiness.

Durham, NC

You are so right "the Truth"... I was so deeply offended by Laura Bush and her reading push.... I'll teach my kids to read if I want to... she can't tell me reading skills are good for my kids. But you know, like Mountainman says, the Laura Bush thought we were stupid and needed to be told to read.

Unbelievable. We go from healthy eating for kids at school is socialism, to I guess we have to choose between good nutrition "or" fitness. You can't do both evidently. It's too bad because Mrs. Obama has been promoting fitness as well... I guess that would be a double whammy.... socialism and communism all wrapped into a dictatorship promoting fitness and nutrition.

I wonder if the same crowd feels Ann Romney's work as first lady of MA was out of line when she promoted teenage pregnancy prevention efforts. Were these same Michele Obama detractors raising up their voices against Ann... telling her to "why not just get government out of peoples lives and leave them alone!!!"

Surely they don't have different standards... ok for one side.....but not for the other? Would they?

E Sam
Provo, UT

Of course schools should do both. Provide nutritious food and have a daily PE class. Mrs. Obama is right to push this issue.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments