BAD IDEA!!! Please don't make school board elections partisan!
Article: "'In general, the public doesn’t have a clue when they
go into the voting booth who’s running for state or local school
board,' Norton said. 'They show up and they see some names on there,
and they don’t know anything about those people at all and so they take a
guess.'"The GOP is banking on school board elections riding
the coattails of straight ticket voters and people "don’t know
anything about those people at all" mechanically voting for the "R"
next to a name.I honestly don't know why some races are
partisan. In some jurisdictions, apolitical functions like surveyor and coroner
are partisan races. I really don't care what a county surveyor's
stance on federalism or abortion rights or Obamacare is, as long as he or she
can run a total station and close a survey within specified tolerances.School board elections should be kept nonpartisan.
Everything I've seen indicates all elections in Utah are partisan.
The current system is too easily manipulated. Something needs to change or we
will always get virtually no choice. If these elections were partisan then we
would get clear choices at multiple levels. I say we do it.
I agree that local school board races are often ignored by the general public
even though they may have the greatest impact on voter's lives and taxes.
However, the fault in not that these races are nonpartisan, but that both the
media and the many school board candidates themselves fail to pay attention to
really informing the public about the real detailed issues impacting school
board races. Instead candidates and media often just offer up sound bites,
fancy sounding brief biographies and generalized statements that sound like
either political party might usually support. The real local democratic process
starts at the school and local school boards supporting the state mandated local
school community councils to get residents, parents, and students more involved
in the substantive issues impacting their schools while the state legislature
continues to back up that support through more funding of these councils that
are directly elected by neighborhood residents and teachers.
Even with the potential problems with partisan candidates, I support the
resolution. IMO it is impossible to find a rational adult who is totally devoid
of some political philosophy or leaning. The idea of "Non-Partisan"
anything is a myth foisted on the public.We all are partisan or
opinionated, Each candidate should be required to enter the debate and
articulate his/her political bent or leaning as it pertains to the school board
and function.I find it insulting that the governor is able to select
candidates for a state wide office that has such a large impact on the citizens
and our budget without a direct selection by the voting public. Heavens, we
were good enough for the governor's race why not the school board?Democracy and Republican Democracy can be messy and frustrating. Deal with
it. Open meetings and open elections isn't that the battle cry of the
Left? Well this is a good place to start.Find good candidates,
support them and vote for them and live with the results. If you don't get
involved, don't gripe.
Calling an election Non-Partisan does not make it so. Collecting and spending
tax revenue and choosing curriculum for students are activities influenced most
by ideology. Why are we pretending otherwise? The current system has created
hidden partisanship, not removed partisanship.
Bad idea. If this became a partisan race, the candidates would be more
concerned about supporting their party's position than working for the good
of Utah's school children. The school children would be short-changed as a
result. For the good of Utah's school children, keep these positions
Why does Oak feel the need to exclude a group of people from running in school
board election? I’m referring to the Hatch Act where a Federal Government
employee is excluded from running in a partisan election. Why would anyone
exclude this group of people? What groups of people would he exclude next? A
scary thought. Other's in history have tried to exclude groups of people.
Where does his exclusion end? Federal employees are already excluded from other
races. Why exclude them more? We live in a Republic – all should have an
equal opportunity.Also, a State Senator was talking in a recent
education committee meeting and said they found that the current State Board of
Education is made up of 14 registered Republicans and 1 registered Democrat.
What is Oak trying to accomplish by making the State Board of Education a
partisan race? Does he want to control the entire State Board of Education with
15 Republicans?Delegtes, Vote NO on this issue
Why does everything have to be partisan? How would making school board
elections partisan change a single thing? This whole suggestion is offensive.
By making the state school board accountable to delegates, we will be able to
actually VET them instead of blindly picking someone with a nice name. Great
idea! I support the resolution.
Reading the comment by "gridlockisbetter" tells us all we need to know
about why the writer chose that moniker.Making our school board even
more political than it already is would not be an intelligent thing to do. Can
anyone say "For Profit Charter Schools" or "Vouchers?"
I see this as an attempt for Republicans to gain even more control of the State.
The only reason to pursue this plan would be to put an "R" and a
"D" in front of a candidates name... which as we all know in this State,
gives the "R" person the advantage. I like the system as it
is... it forces voters to vote for people and ideas, rather than taking the easy
way out and taking the party line.
This resolution will do nothing for the "people" in terms of being able
to vet the candidates. All this will do is make it possible for the republican
insiders to determine who we will see on the ballot. It will not tell me or any
other voter anything more about the candidate than if the candidate was
non-partisan, except that they are a card-carrying member of their chosen party
and they are willing to say that they uphold the platform of that party. This is a case of Oak Norton not being able to get enough of his chosen
on the Alpine School Board. Now, he is doing what he does best, run to the
State Governing Institution to get his way. He did this with the State School
Board over Investigations Math, when he didn't get his way with ASD School
Board. That started the revamp of the State Math Core Curricula. Now, he
doesn't like that and wants the State to revamp everything again, like we
have enough education money to throw money at all his windmills.
This was precisely what the Gadiantons did.Hand picking, selecting
Nepotism.What we are witnessing in the modern day version of the
once righteous nephites, invoking the ancient ways of Cain the Master
Mahan.We might as well rename the Republican Party to the Kishkumen
Party, or Party after the Order of Kishkumen.
Great Idea.All Utah residents should have an R by their name...on
their forehead...wherever.State/Local School Board elections are a
fine first step.Wonderful.
As has been pointed out, the school board is already overwhelmingly Republican.
While it's true that everyone is to some degree partisan, having an
election be non-partisan is no small matter. When an election is partisan, the
candidate's primary responsibility is staying on the good side of the party
bosses, so they can keep representing the party. This is why they want a
partisan process. Right now, when the GOP is upset with a board member, they
don't really have the necessary leverage to insert themselves into the
process and pressure the board member into voting party line on school issues.
Instead, they have the freedom to make educational decisions they feel are best.
I'm fine with throwing out the current system, but what
replaces it should be more open, and the delegates should be more accountable to
the electorate, not the party big wigs.
Strider - Each candidate does enter the debate and articulate his/her political
bent or leaning as it pertains to the school board and function.Each
voter should pay attention without looking for an R or D.
@ There You Go Again, intriguing idea. A scarlet letter.
I have to agree totally with Strider303, it is insulting to have the State
School Board members essentially selected by the Governor. And anyone who
thinks local school boards are not partisan should examine what decisions have
been made by the local boards. And look closely at the background of all the
members on the board. It is rare case when someone who has not been an integral
part of the education system gets elected to the board. When it comes to how my
tax dollars are spent, I want someone with business or accounting background to
be making those decisions, not retired teachers.