Quantcast

Comments about ‘Lawmakers to BLM: Sending seized Nevada cattle to Utah 'imprudent and careless'’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, April 11 2014 1:45 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
omahahusker
Modesto, CA

WORF

This has nothing to do with BHO. Taking lavish vacations should be the subject of another article.

Mr. Bundy needs to become familiar with who owns title on the land - the US Gov't. It is within the right of BLM to manage and remove the cattle if they see fit.

worf
Mcallen, TX

Grazing fees, or no grazing fees.

Our government should not be using armed snipers to take away property from its citizens.

These same leaders now own much of this nations houses. What are they going to do if our economy worsens, and people can't pay? Take our stuff at gunpoint?

It's been reported, fifty three ranchers in this area have now loss their property.

Lilalips
Attleboro, MA

jrgl, he would pay the fees to his state, not the Feds. The only reason the Feds claimed the land was due to the claim to save some obscure tortoise. And yet this same government bombed the Nevada desert with nuclear bombs how many times? Seems a rather "convenient" excuse to control millions of acres. I'm proud of our patriots who stood up to the Feds who should never have been there in the first place.

Screwdriver
Casa Grande, AZ

These people are not true Americans, they never were. They love America as long as it delivers everything in their favor and hate it as soon as it doesn't.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments