Quantcast

Comments about ‘Dan Liljenquist: Putin's Crimea gambit: A challenge to American exceptionalism’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, March 20 2014 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
JoeBlow
Far East USA, SC

"Words and sanctions will not be enough to balance these old yet new geopolitical equations. "

So, Mr Liljenquist, what options does that leave?

I love how people beat around the bush. At least have the backbone to put it in words.

What can you possibly be suggesting, if not military action?

Thid Barker
Victor, ID

In the history of this planet, the vast majority of humans have lived and died under the rule of dictators, despot Kings and tyrants. Our founding fathers established this nation as perhaps the only exception to that in the history of the world where the people told the government what it could and could not do and wrote an inspired constitution that placed limits on the power of the government rather than the government telling its subjects what they could and could not do. That is the exception in all the world,a government of the people, by the people and for the people, truly an exception in all of history. Of course Putin does not understand that because he is just another dictator. Once our own President was asked about American exceptionalism and he said he thinks people in other counties think they are exceptional too. Clearly Mr. Obama does not understand the meaning of American exceptionalism either.

GaryO
Virginia Beach, VA

So Dan Liljenquist, can you offer any suggestions, or do you just like to complain?

Deseret News seems to have an exhaustible supply of complaints, but it's pretty light on solutions . . . kind of like the Republican Party.

Mikhail
ALPINE, UT

When you put something exceptional in the charge of people who believe that it is arrogant and misplaced to be exceptional - then that thing ceases to be exceptional. It can be easily argued that the United States should not be the military police of the world - however, why can't the United States be exceptional in the defense of the smaller and lesser developed kids on the block? The intellectual "children" who are making U.S. policy at this time are dedicated to redefining the United States as a weaker and more compassionate player in the world theatre - so as to avoid the appearance of being "exceptional." So, who is left to inspire and protect? Apparently it is Russia and Putin. IF the strength of the American Spirit is not encourage by our leaders, and manifest through our physical strength, how can we expect that Spirit to grow - let alone flourish. Russian respect only physical strength, much like the bullies of your youth.

Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

Some folks really must think America is a fragile little child, anything that happens in the world becomes a reflection on what the world thinks of her. This is nonsense, arrogant narcissistic little men, who believe they are very very important.

We would be more exceptional if some weren't frothing at the mouth to start another war, which doesn't really involve us.

Treaties with Ukraine, file those with the Indian treaties.

Lets get our house in order, and lead by example, not look for excuses to keep fighting, financing fighting, supplying the world with tools to make fighting deadlier.

Gibster
San Antonio, TX

Sir

I reject your assertion that the military is festering with corruption and lack of discipline. A majority of those serving (both military and civilian) are dedicated professionals who are committed to the defense of our nation. Don't vilify all of of because of the actions of a few bad apples.

Esquire
Springville, UT

Sorry, but this piece is ridiculous. I urge its author to spend more time learning some history and geo-politics rather than spouting right wing rhetoric. Putin's actions have nothing to do with "American exceptionalism." This is a self serving propaganda taliing point of the right wing.

pragmatistferlife
salt lake city, utah

Well now we know what insanity looks like.

Every President since Kennedy given the chance to fight with Russia or find another way has chosen the later, including George H Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush, and now Obama.

Kennedy gave into Russia's demands, Bush, and Clinton specifically wrote the 1994 agreement in such a way that it didn't include military action and didn't have the weight of an international agreement. George Bush was for once smart enough to know a fight worth fighting and one not worth fighting.

But, hey what did they know about American exceptionalisim?

I hate to break it to you Barker but America did not invent democracy, America did not invent a Republican form of government, America did not invent individual rights and freedoms, heck we didn't even invent capitalism or banking.

Everything you see as exceptional about America was begged and borrowed from history. We can talk about how our cobbling together of these principles has worked but don't get all puffy, and teary eyed about origins, none of it was created here.

Kim
Cedar Park, Texas

The way to make things worse is to continue to promote "American Exceptionalism." What if the shoe was on the other foot and Putin was promoting "Russian Expceptionalism.?" To go around the world touting your exceptionalism is a clear path to poor foreign relations.

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

So Russian exceptionalism runs smack into American exceptionalism. That's the sort of thing that nearly got us all killed a generation ago. The answer then as now is balance. What are you gonna do about Crimea? There's nothing you can do. I've been there. The Crimeans are Russians. They've always wanted to be Russians. If we even tried to "liberate" them, they'd liberate themselves from our liberation. Where we can assert our influence to counterbalance Russia, we should. But Crimea is not in our sphere of influence.

BTW, Dan, your vision of a rotten America is nothing compared to the rot in Russia, which is just a big gas pump attached to a country where vodka is the national obsession.

Hutterite
American Fork, UT

What would an Exceptional American response be in this case? Are we to attempt armed conflict with Russia in Crimea? Can we voice that option without taking into account how stupid and costly and foolish it would be? I don't know what the answer should be yet, but it's fairly easy to eliminate some options right away.

mohokat
Ogden, UT

KGB vs ACORN. mmmmm. Not a good match

Kent C. DeForrest
Provo, UT

Sorry, Dan, but this is not about America. In fact, even suggesting that this is about American exceptionalism is proof that American exceptionalism has been blown way out of proportion. This is about Putin trying to maintain his sphere of influence and perhaps reconstruct the Soviet Empire he continues to mourn.

Laura Ann
Layton, UT

I'm ashamed of our country. There are many things we could do if we wanted to. If Europe and the United States worked together, they could bring great economic pressure on Russia. I don't want war, I just want us to help our fellow brethren if we can. Obama is terrible at dealing with foreign policy. There are things we can do, but most Americans have no idea about the Ukraine and Russia because they are too busy texting, playing electronic games, and being on social networks to even bother about the world around them.

Mikhail
ALPINE, UT

Want to put pressure on Russia? Try being exceptional at everything. Say what you mean and mean what you say. If Russia needs to sell its oil and natural gas to be economically viable, let us turn on the spigot and produce more oil and natural gas so as to drive down prices in the marketplace. Don't whisper to Russian leaders that elections give the President more flexibility. Honor your NATO commitments. Be friends to your friends and enemies to your enemies. Don't confuse your enemies with your friends.

I suppose that the Crimeans have the right to be Russians if they want - call the moving vans and make the move. Certainly, there must be some historical basis (and I am not talking about what happened 100 to 400 years ago) for the boundaries of Ukraine - colonization by outsiders taken into consideration. How come those who oppose Israeli colonization are the same people who support Russian colonization within Ukraine?

Craig Clark
Boulder, CO

This column reads like an American counterpoint to Putin’s nationalistic rant before the Russian Parliament. If Liljenquist has a prescription to offer, I see no hint of what it might be. He seems to be shaken at the grim realization that American exceptionalism may be a myth that clouded our judgment for far too long. Did the end of the cold war actually lull us into a false confidence?

It’s devastating to wake up to the realization that you’re not superman and you never were.

patriot
Cedar Hills, UT

Putin 1 Obama 0. Get used to it...

Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

Russian patriot
Putin 1 Obama 0. Get used to it...

So how does one keep score in this petty fox news game?
Someone in the world does something anything they get a point against Obama.

Seems most of the true patriots, true american conservatives think the world of Putin, he's their new Reagan and why not their ability to remember the truth about him has all but been forgotten or rewritten too.

McMurphy
St George, Utah

Esquire has it right. Lijenquist lays out a litany of economic, political and military woes. I agree with many (not the military ones) but do not believe these problems played any role in Putin's decision to annex Crimea. We are still the most powerful nation in the world economically and militarily. Are we or should we be willing to go to war militarily or economically with Russia over Crimea? No. Would we have been willing to 15-years ago? I doubt it. Assuming our American Exceptionalism (whatever that means)was still intact would any moral suasion based on such exceptionalism have deterred Putin? Unlikely. Lijenquist among others is rising up in righteous indignation over Putin's actions. What is lacking are any possible proposals that would cause the KGB Colonel to reverse himself.

one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

The vague concept of "exceptionalism" is a Fox new anti-Obama spin developed after the President refocused from the Iraq failure and ruined the right wing myth that only the right can effectively address security.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments