Quantcast

Comments about ‘'Noah' banned in three countries weeks before world premiere’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, March 10 2014 6:32 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

Isn't it interesting. Here one religion bans a film for entire countries because there are elements of the film that go against the religion of some but not all of its citizens.

And then in the Mormon capital of the world we celebrate and welcome the production of a play that mocks things sacred to Mormons.

Thankfully, I haven't heard of a single threat of violence from any Mormon due to the play coming here.

Can you imagine a play mocking the Quran put on in these countries?

Or even our country?

Neither can I.

Mormons, I'm sorry a sad double standard exist.

I thank you for yor non violent and reasonable opposition to something tht mocks your religion.

You are great examples of peace to many.

Hutterite
American Fork, UT

You can't be surprised...or complain. Religion is what we don't have in common. It divides us like nothing else can.

intervention
slc, UT

@chris b
Funny I thought Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain were countries not a religion. The leaders of these countries no more represent the store Muslim religion then you represent all Christians.

intervention
slc, UT

Sorry that should be entire not store, I did not pick up on the auto correct, but the point remains.

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

intervention,

Ya, hide behind the wording. It's not Islamic leaders that are banning it and it doesn't have to do with discrepancies between Islam and the movie huh?

I bet the movie says something negative about the political landscape in Qatar, UAE, and Bahrain. You're right.

intervention
slc, UT

@chris

So did I say the leaders of those countries did not ban it because of their. Beliefs? No I said and repeat the decisions made by these three government leaders is no more representative of all Muslims then you are of all Christians but please continue to miss represent me.

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

intervention,

It was a religion that made this decision and any attempt to suggest otherwise is simply dishonest.

You're right that these specific countries don't represent 100% of the Muslims world but yes are examples of what the Muslims world thinks today and more importantly how they act. And again isn't it interesting the differences between how the Mormons have handled the Book of Mormon play and how most people in the US have viewed the production as perfectly acceptable and good entertainment even though it mocks what Mormons hold sacred.

And yet even though Islam has just as may quirks that easily could be made into a hilarious production mocking what they hold sacred the hypocritical left would never dare support such a large scale production mocking Islam.

And I'm curious intervention, since you want to believe these countries don't represent the muslim world, what country would be as tolerant of a play mocking muslims as the United States has been with the Mormon play?

I don't see a large production mocking Muslims being produced in the US ever.

And certainly not in a Muslim country.

Thanks Mormons for being peaceful.

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

Chris B, appreciation for your appreciation of Mormons. You are right about that. Still, there are 1 billion Muslims who don't live in those 3 countries. You won't have any problem seeing that flick in Istanbul, for example. So let's be fair all around.

Tators
Hyrum, UT

@ Irony Guy:

Like the article said, there will probably be additional Muslim dominated countries who will yet ban the film. We'll know soon enough.

I have to agree with Chris on this one. The countries who have banned the film are basically theocracies... where country leaders make political decisions based upon their country's dominant religion... the Muslim religion, and tie politics and religion together. So in that sense, they are representing their religion when choosing to ban the film. There are no reports of any of official Muslim leaders or citizens protesting that decision.

It's actually sad that they treat their citizens like little children who can't be trusted to make up their own minds about something so trivial as a movie made for entertainment. That seems like paranoia by taking away people's right to choose for themselves.

Chris is also right about there being a double standard in America... especially by the left. They obviously treat different religions differently. They deem the play mocking the Book of Mormon as good entertainment, while at the same time they were incensed about a 10 minute You-Tube video making fun of Muhammad. Total double standard.

intervention
slc, UT

@chris
"It was a religion that made this decision" they really are countries not "a religion."
I also find it curious how you support religions (including the LDS) using religion as a reason to impose restrictions on all Americians.

joe5
South Jordan, UT

intervention: Sorry. Here is where I need to butt in. What religion has ever imposed a restriction on you? The LDS church or any other church has never passed a law in this country. Their advocacy is not binding on you and forces nothing on you.

What you apparently want is for religions to vacate their place in the public forum. You want to silence voices of certain citizens instead of letting them advocate for what they think are the best rules for the welfare of our society.

I don't know about others but I will not stand down and be silent. I have as much right to express my opinion as you do to express yours. And I'm sorry if it offends you that I oppose abortion or that I favor strict rules with regard to alcohol consumption. But, then again, I'm sure you have things you would like to impose on me that I would find offensive as well.

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

intervention,

Now you're just making things up. When have I have supported religion using religion as a reason to impose restrictions on all Americans.

No issue I support is based mainly in what a religious group has said. Just because I may agree with something a religious group supports does not mean my support is based on religious thinking.

It does not.

Want to try again?

Hank Jr
Draper, UT

Considering the present state of our nation, I'm surprised Noah hasn't been banned here.

Jamescmeyer
Midwest City, USA, OK

Joe5, I especially appreciate your comment. Thank you for standing and making it.

"Religion" has never bound or enslaved me. People who blindly oppose religion seek to do that-but the way of the Lord is to allow all to make their case, and for us to be free to choose what sort of way we'll follow. We do not impose or enforce our way on others; we provide the knowledge and opportunity for them to choose or reject it, while maintaining our freedom to be on that path.

Schnee
Salt Lake City, UT

@joe5
"Their advocacy is not binding on you and forces nothing on you."

"What you apparently want is for religions to vacate their place in the public forum."

But if their advocacy is not binding and has never forced anything on me... then wouldn't they already have no place (effectively) in the public forum of policy debate due to having 0 influence? As a result I would say that their advocacy can lead to things being forced on me or others (like same-sex marriage bans which don't personally affect me but do effect others).

Gildas
LOGAN, UT

Hang on though.

Moslem nations ban bad things like alcohol, don't they?
Our LDS leadership supported that same ban in the USA.
Unfortunately they had not sufficient support in Utah.

Moslem nations ban pornography I believe.
Spain banned public wearing of the bikini.

Whatever else may or many not be bad about individual
nations support for good things and opposition to
degrading things is, in my opinion, refreshing.

Let's keep on, or begin, banning and punishing murder, theft,
false accusations, and other evils, like abortion, and at
least a certain depth of pornographic publications.

I guess if it's "Moslem" or connected therewith it must
be wrong, and if it's the West we are always right.

"Considering the state", morally, of the USA today, I am
completely without amazement that very little is considered
bad enough to ban, or good enough to praise.

Tolstoy
salt lake, UT

@joe5

your comments bring us full circle then don't they? while religion may have "influenced" the decisions of the leaders of these countries it was not religions that actually enforced the laws and Chris's criticism of Islam as a whole would therefore be unfounded and unjust which would make intervention right from the beginning.

windsor
City, Ut

Thanks Chris B. for your kind words

Tolstoy
salt lake, UT

@chris b
"When have I have supported religion using religion as a reason to impose restrictions on all Americans."

"I'm not LDS but I stand with Mormon Prophet Monson and Pope Francis on this. Technically I'm Catholic but don't really identify as a Catholic. But it is nice knowing I agree with Pope Francis and Mormon Prophet Monson, both men who according to their religions speak for God."

Christopher B
Ogden, UT

Tolstoy,

No issue I support is based mainly in what a religious group has said. Just because I may agree with something a religious group supports does not mean my support is based on religious thinking.

Want to try again?

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments