Comments about ‘House gives go-ahead to prepare Utah for first U.S. presidential primary in 2016’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, March 10 2014 11:25 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
DN Subscriber
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Talk about frivolous "message" bills...

There are lots of problems with the selection of nominees at all levels. This fixes noe of them, but only give Utah politicians the illusion of "doing something".

This is a bill that we don't need.

Mayfair
City, Ut

Would be a refreshing change to not hear 'Iowa' all the time.

Henry Drummond
San Jose, CA

You would think there would be a better way to do this. Why not have all the states in the same region have their primaries on the same day and rotate which region goes first? The current system is just crazy.

Steve Cottrell
Centerville, UT

Perhaps our legislature would do well to spend that 1.6 million dollars in some place in the state where it is needed.

Remember the statement from Senator Dirkson years ago: A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon we're talking about real money.

Dear Utah legislature: A million 600 thousand here and there can also amount to real money. Where is the conservative philosophy that our legislators claim?

One of a Few
Layton, UT

Tilting windmills since everyone, including national republicans know it doesn't matter in Utah who wins the Republican nomination, the Republican nominee will win the vote in Utah.

SAS
Sandy, UT

Ok, so the party that's been apoplectic about voter fraud (after all, it's the only way "that one" could have been elected president) and the need for seven forms of identification before anyone can vote is now proposing an *online* election?

I think we can be pretty sure that this will never actually happen.

GaryO
Virginia Beach, VA

It all sounds pretty silly . . . So silly, l'm guessing the Tea Party is all for it. So Utah is going to be waving and shrieking "Look at me!" to the national media?

How are you going to feel when the national media refuses to look?

What makes you think the rest of the country will even turn their heads to watch a bunch of Utah Mormons vote Republican again?

Think about the image of Iowa compared to the image of Utah. Iowa is America's heartland . . .Mom and apple pie . . . typical America.

Utah is Utah.

.

Utah_1
Salt Lake City, UT

Why spend $1.6 Million taxpayer money when we could do it free March Neighborhood Caucus meetings. Vote No on HB 410

GaryO
Virginia Beach, VA

The primary is a good idea to replace the caucus, but the idea of jumping ahead of New Hampshire and Iowa is a bad idea. It would make Utah look needy, and Utah does not need to look needy.

But the primary is a good idea. With a caucus, it's easier for the likes of the Koch brothers to grease the palms of the most influential people in the caucus.

At least with a primary, everyone gets a chance to vote.

Dragline
Orem, UT

Rep. Jon Cox, R-Ephraim, needs to do a little investigation before changing up the order of primary elections. Does he know that New Hampshire has it in their constitution that they are to be the first primary? Does he know they were going to change it from January to December or November last presidential election? Does he remember the problems that Florida and others ran into with the GOP when they tried to get out ahead of NH in the last presidential election?
I know about dreaming, but I also know about waking up. This isn't going to happen.

elkman11
salt lake, UT

What a waste of tax dollars!! Especially when The republican nominee will get the majority of the Utah vote.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments