Comments about ‘Lawmakers defer action on canal safety measure’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 25 2014 2:50 p.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Fitness Freak
Salt Lake City, UT

In almost all instances, canal companies were there FIRST.

The cities, when they allowed development along the canals, SHOULD have required the developer to build berms, walls, whatever necessary to protect the new homeowners.

In most instances, they DIDN'T do that.

WHY is any burden now put on the canal companies to do what the city and developers SHOULD have done to begin with?

Salt Lake City, UT

Fitness freak Because it is their canal.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments