Quantcast
Opinion

Letter: Charity destination?

Comments

Return To Article
  • lost in DC West Jordan, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 4:08 p.m.

    Irony Guy,
    I am not defending Lee defaulting on his mortgage, but if you think it was the depositors who took a loss, you are sorely misinformed on how depository institutions in this country function.

    The bank's shareholders took the loss, but since, in the eyes of so many on the left, they are just greedy owners of those evil banks, they deserve to take the losses.

    since the establishment of the FDIC in 1934, no insured depositor has lost so much as a penny when a bank has failed. No, it was not the dpositors who lost.

    FT,
    people defaulting on mortgages created a cost to the public only because barney frank insisted fannie and freddie lend to poor credit risks

  • wrz Phoenix, AZ
    Feb. 21, 2014 3:18 p.m.

    @Sal:
    "... if a charity donation is so personal and private then why make a public statement about what you will do with your salary? For show?

    Almost everything politicians do is for show.... including announcing that they're giving their wages to charity. But the ultimate destination of their giving is private. Just like yours and mine are private. If for no other reason than to protect the privacy of the donee.

    @airnaut:
    "When THEY were they one's who made it public statement, It is no longer considered private, but public."

    The donee is what's private about the donation.

  • FT salt lake city, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 2:23 p.m.

    I agree he should pay off his personal debts first before donating to charity. The rest of us have had our interest rates and taxes increased to pay for others who walked away from their mortgages.

  • Utefan60 Salt Lake City, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 1:27 p.m.

    Casual observer: I hate to break the news to you but they did receive their full salaries during the Shutdown. That is why there were so many people upset. Also when they made public statements and used the newspapers, and TV to tell us that they were going to give their salary to charity, it becomes a matter of public record. They made such a big deal out of it because unlike many Americans they were getting paid. Mike Lee made several statements that "he deserved" his salary. These statements were promptly criticized and he came back mimicking the statement by Senator hatch that he was going to donate his full salary during the full time of the shutdown. When these guys use the public stage to promote themselves, we as the pubic have a right to hold them to their word.

  • airnaut Everett, 00
    Feb. 21, 2014 11:12 a.m.

    wrz
    Phoenix, AZ
    The charity to which anyone gives is personal in formation.

    8:50 a.m. Feb. 21, 2014

    ========

    When THEY were they one's who made it public statement,
    It is no longer considered private, but public.

  • Flashback Kearns, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 11:08 a.m.

    Frankly, it is none of anyones business who they dontated to, just like its non of your business who I may donate to.

  • Irony Guy Bountiful, Utah
    Feb. 21, 2014 10:40 a.m.

    Mike Lee should have donated his to the depositors of the bank he stiffed when he defaulted on his mortgage.

  • casual observer Salt Lake City, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 10:36 a.m.

    Curmudgeon, one old man and Ranch,

    They announced it to demonstrate that they were not receiving their salaries during those troublesome times just as many others were not. Character assassination by innuendo and not fact is one of the lowest, but commonest political tactics. I'm certain that wherever they made their charitable donations, which are rightly private information, would be criticized by some people. No good deed goes unpunished.

  • Sal Provo, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 10:17 a.m.

    @wrz: if a charity donation is so personal and private then why make a public statement about what you will do with your salary? For show?

  • wrz Phoenix, AZ
    Feb. 21, 2014 8:50 a.m.

    The charity to which anyone gives is personal in formation.

  • one old man Ogden, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 8:42 a.m.

    Ranch, OPM, and Curmudgeon --- three GREAT comments! All spot on.

  • Curmudgeon Salt Lake City, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 8:36 a.m.

    Well, charity begins at home, so that would be the first place I'd look.

  • Open Minded Mormon Everett, 00
    Feb. 21, 2014 8:35 a.m.

    They already are --
    They are powerful United States Senators,
    and tell us they are taking care of the "Little People" who elect them...

    ...right after they take care of the Corporations and Special Interest Groups who control them.

  • Ranch Here, UT
    Feb. 21, 2014 8:24 a.m.

    I'll give you one guess (and it really isn't a 'charity').