Published: Saturday, Jan. 25 2014 12:00 a.m. MST
Good Grief!The mere fact that no other First Lady has ever been
criticized for having a birthday party only shows the unfettered hatred the
right wing has for the President. Seriously folks, how can you deny that at
least some of this vitriol isn't racially motivated? Unbelievable! Seriously, unbelievable. And yes, I'm angry. Leave the
First Lady alone, for crying out loud. Such petty insults.
I understand that people can have an issue with taxpayer funded trips for
elected officials.A dollar spent is a dollar spent. So, if the is
the "real" issue, party affiliation would not matter.But
alas, just another Partisan hater who will sink to pathetic depths to rally more
hatred from the like minded. As if that is necessary.Does the
writer have any idea (or even care) what other presidents have spent on
celebrations at tax payer expense.This new breed of partisan haters
(born in the last 6 years) is off the charts.
Would you be asking the same question if Mitt had won and the Romneys had
celebrated Ann's birthday?
I wholeheartedly thank the Obamas for their fine service to our Nation.....even
if First Lady Michelle Obama's birthday party cost a million
dollars....Michelle Obama and her family deserve our respect and admiration. In
Utah, it is STILL wildly popular to whine and complain about our Amazing
President Barack Obama and His family. Many religions teach that in our nation
we believe in being subject to elections, presidents, magistrates, and laws.
I've yet to hear of a religion that teaches being a poor-sport,
Whatever the figure, it's sure to be less than the cost of the 9 ships the
US Navy wanted to retire, but which Congress legislated to remain in service in
last week's appropriations bill because their maintenance protects jobs
and campaign donors in various Congress Critters' districts. Or the new
tanks the US Army doesn't want but that Congress ordered be built to keep
the assembly lines going for the same reasons.Seriously, that's
the stuff that taxpayers should be angry about instead of constant whining about
the Obamas' vacations or parties, which amount to a thimble in an ocean.
According to news reports, including from Fox News, the President paid for his
wife's birthday party. I'm sorry I missed your letter
asking about Laura Bush's parties while her husband was in the White House,
but I'm sure her husband also paid.
So what exactly is the expected payoff for making such devisive commentts?
Does the author feel better about themself? Do they think they have scored some
political points for having made such comments? What is the point other then to
I imagine your equally angry that the state is going to dump 2 million to fight
to take constitutional rights away from people, being a responsible taxpayer and
Has civic discourse slipped to a level where this kind of letter is worthy of
I'm sure you were outraged at Bush and Regan's parties as well. How
much have the taxpayers paid Mrs. Obama for the work she does with world
leaders? Zip. We're getting a pretty good deal.
Given that the president has to buy his own groceries in the White House (yes,
that's the law) it seems a bit improbable that a birthday party for Mrs.
Obama's 50th is going to be a burden on taxpayers.And when
other First Ladies also celebrated their birthdays in the White House, were you
equally up in arms? Moreover, given that any number of corporations
throw lavish parties for their executives and write them off of their taxes as
"business expenses," do you really believe that in terms of
taxpayer-funded parties this 50th birthday party for the First Lady truly
represents something worthy of your outrage?"Obama Derangement
Syndrome" (a visceral hatred of _anything_ associated with our current
president) is a real phenomenon, and this petty, spiteful letter, unencumbered
by the thought process, is exhibit A.
However, as a responsible taxpayer, I would like to know how much her birthday
celebration cost the United States taxpayers? ====== Good Grief, talk about petty complaints.Stooping to new lows.Birth Certificates didn't work, Fast & Furious didn't
work,Benghazi didn't work, Mitt Romney didn't work, de-funding Obamacare didn't work, shutting down the Government
didn't work...Let's try complaining about the 1st
lady's birthday party!However, as a responsible taxpayer,you should be upset about $100 trillion lost by the Bush economic meltdown,
$4 trillion in unfunded meddling in the Middle East, $1 Trillion in
TARP hand-outs to corporations, and $224 billion lost by Ted Cruz and Mike
Lee's little Shut-down tantrum.Birthday parties....Good
grief.Talk about motes and beams in one's own eye.
Ill bet that party didn't cost as much as what the previous Utah Attorney
General (s) accepted in fun vacations?
Michelle is welcome to have a birthday party, on her own money. Her birthday
party is a private affair, and should be paid for by her (and her
husband's) bank account. As long as that is the way it went down, no
problem. But if the taxpayers paid one dollar for the party, that is
wrong. It is not official business. It should not be paid for by taxes any more
than my birthday party should be a tax deductible expense from my business. I fail to see why any true American would think it is the taxpayers job
to pay for any person's birthday party. We don't have royalty, because
we don't think the taxpayers should lavish anyone by law at the expense of
all.Weird how people defend this behavior, and call everyone names
who does not.
This type of opinion piece does a disservice to the rational people of Utah.
Our state's reputation is poor and an irrational letter like this makes it
Actually it was a good comment and question. One that is okay to wonder and ask
now or in the past. Presidents and their families pay their own groceries.
Whether or not all the costs of birthday parties for either the president or his
wife is paid by them or by the government is not known. But honoring the
president and his wife on their birthday is traditional. And appropriate.
DN, did you pull this letter from the Comic pages? When will this POTUS and
First Lady be judged on the same criteria as their predecessors?
I assume the writer would also have protested the budget-busting price of the
Reagan inaugurals, which as I remember were by far the most expensive in
history. (Of course, that was Reagan, so it's different, right? This is
A White House official made the following statement several days ago, which was
quite easy to find online: "The President threw the First Lady a dance party
last Saturday for her 50th birthday. It was a private gathering of family and
friends and was paid for by the president."The key words, of
course, are "paid for by the President."
It's these types of letters that really make me depressed. I think this
country really has peaked.If we must waste time and ink space on
opinion pieces to write garbage like this, rather than actually tackle real
local and national issues, then how can we expect to solve anything?If the dialog today has become so uncivil, so petty, and so immature, then all
hope in actually discussing solutions for real issues is lost. This
country deserves everything it gets. It deserves to be in bondage to
corporations, its land to be ravaged by big oil, and its youth sent to endless
war. It really is that simple.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments